Indietro PelleSmithSatanic panic • en.wikipedia.org

Principali contributi apportati a una pagina Tutti i contributi apportati a una pagina da un utente, in ordine cronologico.

Pagina Satanic panic (Registro · Cronologia della pagina)
Utente PelleSmith (Contatore contributi· Maggiori contributi)
Contributi totali 53
Modifiche minori 9 (17%)
Modifiche (semi-)automatiche 2 (3.8%)
Contributi annullati 6 (11.3%)
atbe1 8.5
Aggiunto (byte)2 2601
Cancellati (byte) -8725
Modifiche minori · 9 (17%)
Contributi maggiori · 44 (83%)
Modifiche (semi-)automatiche · 2 (3.8%)
Contributi manuali · 51 (96.2%)
Contributi annullati · 6 (11.3%)
Contributi non ripristinati · 47 (88.7%)
1 Tempo medio tra i contributi (giorni)
2 Il testo aggiunto è qualsiasi aggiunta positiva che non è stata annullata (approssimativo)
Data Collegamenti Dimensione Oggetto della modifica
Diff · Cronologia -363 Undid revision 318948724 by Fassitman (talk)
Diff · Cronologia -851 remove unecyclopedic additions
Diff · Cronologia 3 Undid revision 308419125 by 76.95.65.208 (talk)
Diff · Cronologia 37 I was trying not to be weasely ... the version prior to my change is poorly articulated
Diff · Cronologia 34 (annullato)  False memories:
Diff · Cronologia 0 Michelle Remembers and the McMartin preschool trial:
Diff · Cronologia 0 Historical precedents:
Diff · Cronologia -1894 undo ... again ... the minority position ALREADY EXISTS a the end of the lead ... references are not needed in the lead ... please take it to talk
Diff · Cronologia -1894 (annullato)  undo ... the position is already covered in the last sentence ... the references are only needed in the body of the entry where this is fleshed out
Diff · Cronologia 462 revert self ... wrong encyclopedia ... we did discuss this reference before however ... and I'm not entirely sure why it is necessary here at all
Diff · Cronologia -462 (annullato)  the chapter of the encyclopedia is not describing the same concept ... this reference has been discussed and I have reviewed it personally ... please do not add it back
Diff · Cronologia -462 (annullato)  that reference is for *sadistic*ritual abuse ... not *satanic* ritual abuse
Diff · Cronologia -509 undo - please take it to talk ... this is the subject of an edit war
Diff · Cronologia -1092 (annullato)  please do not edit war ... take it to talk ... the lack of current research has been discussed and the survey cited is entirely misleading and possible unreliable for that information
Diff · Cronologia -86 discussion requires you wait for a response ... please engage the talk page with others before resorting to this ... a vast majority of us do not agree with you
Diff · Cronologia -86 (annullato)  please take up the complaint on the talk page in detail ... we've been through a lot of discussion there already and consensus is that the mainstream scholarly position is well represented
Diff · Cronologia 240 Dissociative identity disorder: The rumour spreading accusation, if only made by one source, is a BLP concern, but this other one clearly is not, and is also clearly pertinent
Diff · Cronologia 30 False memories: attributing
Diff · Cronologia 142 As a moral panic:
Diff · Cronologia 12 Pseudo-satanism:
Diff · Cronologia 58 Cult-based abuse: more editing
Diff · Cronologia 34 some basic editing ... also "ritual abuse" is often simply interchangable with SRA and has none of the "nuance" ascribed to the later terminology
Diff · Cronologia 247 undo ... please explain on talk ...
Diff · Cronologia -35 undo -- we have reliable sources for this ... you have no current reliable sources to contend that this isn't the mainstream POV ... take it to talk
Diff · Cronologia -229 Skepticism:
Diff · Cronologia 248 Evidence:
Diff · Cronologia 74
Diff · Cronologia -24 History: removing red herring tag ... and btw the original term "believer" shows up all over the literature ... and could be cited to no stance, middle ground sources ... is that preferable?
Diff · Cronologia -15 Skepticism:
Diff · Cronologia 263 Skepticism: adding ref
Diff · Cronologia -657 remove ... this has nothing to do with "research" ... reporting on the claims of patients before anyone knew what was going on ... hardly accounts for research
Diff · Cronologia -5 Court cases:
Diff · Cronologia 160 Court cases: both statements were from the same source ... tried to clarify them.
Diff · Cronologia -957 Research: people opinion on hypothetical situations is complete hearsay and has no business in a wikipedia entry ... and Area 51 "could" "possibly" contain aliens
Diff · Cronologia 42 History: NOT OR ... please explain on talk ... by no means do a majority of "therapists" advocate this position, so specificity is a must
Diff · Cronologia 70 Research: someone who has the Bibby reference needs to look this up ... the old wording is most likely not correct unless he supports a specific POV himself
Diff · Cronologia -415 Research: as already mentioned above the eyewitness recanted
Diff · Cronologia 38 History: qualifying the adocates as with the skeptics
Diff · Cronologia 55 History: Clarifying skeptics
Diff · Cronologia 9 Polarization: This sentence needs a serious rewrite -- it falaciously equates the claims for and against based on "no evidence" ... something that actually supports the claims against
Diff · Cronologia 9 History: lets be clear ...
Diff · Cronologia -923 History: remove weasely "could be" should be would be ... besides it has nothing to do with the "history"
Diff · Cronologia -19 History: remove duplicate reference
Diff · Cronologia -160 History:
Diff · Cronologia 36 History: various clarifications
Diff · Cronologia -6 History: often? when have they ever been substantiated past testimony? ... contradicted all over this entry and is clearly misleading as well as weasely
Diff · Cronologia 18 this is better
Diff · Cronologia 25 Cult-based abuse: Original wikilink leads to the confusion of Satanism as an actual religious practice with "Satanism
Diff · Cronologia 6 Cult-based abuse: clarify ... not just the second set of claims
Diff · Cronologia 16 this link is more appropriate
Diff · Cronologia -514 Skepticism: remove unrelated commnetary by Kent ... once again, nothing that actually deals with the veracity of the claims ... again this is simply deceptive
Diff · Cronologia -1063 Skepticism: removing deceptive insertions ... please see talk
Diff · Cronologia 267 undo ... I don't see that point made elsewhere at all ... I see a different point about incoherence
Tutti gli orari sono in formato UTC