Enrere PelleSmithSatanic panic • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Pàgina Satanic panic (Jornal · Page History)
Usuari PelleSmith (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total de modificacions 53
Cambiaments menors 9 (17%)
Edicions semi-automatitzades 2 (3,8%)
Reverted edits 6 (11,3%)
atbe1 8,5
Afegit (octets)2 2.601
Eliminat (bytes) -8.725
Cambiaments menors · 9 (17%)
Major edits · 44 (83%)
Edicions semi-automatitzades · 2 (3,8%)
Manual edits · 51 (96,2%)
Reverted edits · 6 (11,3%)
Unreverted edits · 47 (88,7%)
1 Dies de mitjana entre edicions
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (aproximadament)
Data Ligams Talha Resum d'edició
Diferències · Istoric -363 Undid revision 318948724 by Fassitman (talk)
Diferències · Istoric -851 remove unecyclopedic additions
Diferències · Istoric 3 Undid revision 308419125 by 76.95.65.208 (talk)
Diferències · Istoric 37 I was trying not to be weasely ... the version prior to my change is poorly articulated
Diferències · Istoric 34 (reverted)  False memories:
Diferències · Istoric 0 Michelle Remembers and the McMartin preschool trial:
Diferències · Istoric 0 Historical precedents:
Diferències · Istoric -1.894 undo ... again ... the minority position ALREADY EXISTS a the end of the lead ... references are not needed in the lead ... please take it to talk
Diferències · Istoric -1.894 (reverted)  undo ... the position is already covered in the last sentence ... the references are only needed in the body of the entry where this is fleshed out
Diferències · Istoric 462 revert self ... wrong encyclopedia ... we did discuss this reference before however ... and I'm not entirely sure why it is necessary here at all
Diferències · Istoric -462 (reverted)  the chapter of the encyclopedia is not describing the same concept ... this reference has been discussed and I have reviewed it personally ... please do not add it back
Diferències · Istoric -462 (reverted)  that reference is for *sadistic*ritual abuse ... not *satanic* ritual abuse
Diferències · Istoric -509 undo - please take it to talk ... this is the subject of an edit war
Diferències · Istoric -1.092 (reverted)  please do not edit war ... take it to talk ... the lack of current research has been discussed and the survey cited is entirely misleading and possible unreliable for that information
Diferències · Istoric -86 discussion requires you wait for a response ... please engage the talk page with others before resorting to this ... a vast majority of us do not agree with you
Diferències · Istoric -86 (reverted)  please take up the complaint on the talk page in detail ... we've been through a lot of discussion there already and consensus is that the mainstream scholarly position is well represented
Diferències · Istoric 240 Dissociative identity disorder: The rumour spreading accusation, if only made by one source, is a BLP concern, but this other one clearly is not, and is also clearly pertinent
Diferències · Istoric 30 False memories: attributing
Diferències · Istoric 142 As a moral panic:
Diferències · Istoric 12 Pseudo-satanism:
Diferències · Istoric 58 Cult-based abuse: more editing
Diferències · Istoric 34 some basic editing ... also "ritual abuse" is often simply interchangable with SRA and has none of the "nuance" ascribed to the later terminology
Diferències · Istoric 247 undo ... please explain on talk ...
Diferències · Istoric -35 undo -- we have reliable sources for this ... you have no current reliable sources to contend that this isn't the mainstream POV ... take it to talk
Diferències · Istoric -229 Skepticism:
Diferències · Istoric 248 Evidence:
Diferències · Istoric 74
Diferències · Istoric -24 History: removing red herring tag ... and btw the original term "believer" shows up all over the literature ... and could be cited to no stance, middle ground sources ... is that preferable?
Diferències · Istoric -15 Skepticism:
Diferències · Istoric 263 Skepticism: adding ref
Diferències · Istoric -657 remove ... this has nothing to do with "research" ... reporting on the claims of patients before anyone knew what was going on ... hardly accounts for research
Diferències · Istoric -5 Court cases:
Diferències · Istoric 160 Court cases: both statements were from the same source ... tried to clarify them.
Diferències · Istoric -957 Research: people opinion on hypothetical situations is complete hearsay and has no business in a wikipedia entry ... and Area 51 "could" "possibly" contain aliens
Diferències · Istoric 42 History: NOT OR ... please explain on talk ... by no means do a majority of "therapists" advocate this position, so specificity is a must
Diferències · Istoric 70 Research: someone who has the Bibby reference needs to look this up ... the old wording is most likely not correct unless he supports a specific POV himself
Diferències · Istoric -415 Research: as already mentioned above the eyewitness recanted
Diferències · Istoric 38 History: qualifying the adocates as with the skeptics
Diferències · Istoric 55 History: Clarifying skeptics
Diferències · Istoric 9 Polarization: This sentence needs a serious rewrite -- it falaciously equates the claims for and against based on "no evidence" ... something that actually supports the claims against
Diferències · Istoric 9 History: lets be clear ...
Diferències · Istoric -923 History: remove weasely "could be" should be would be ... besides it has nothing to do with the "history"
Diferències · Istoric -19 History: remove duplicate reference
Diferències · Istoric -160 History:
Diferències · Istoric 36 History: various clarifications
Diferències · Istoric -6 History: often? when have they ever been substantiated past testimony? ... contradicted all over this entry and is clearly misleading as well as weasely
Diferències · Istoric 18 this is better
Diferències · Istoric 25 Cult-based abuse: Original wikilink leads to the confusion of Satanism as an actual religious practice with "Satanism
Diferències · Istoric 6 Cult-based abuse: clarify ... not just the second set of claims
Diferències · Istoric 16 this link is more appropriate
Diferències · Istoric -514 Skepticism: remove unrelated commnetary by Kent ... once again, nothing that actually deals with the veracity of the claims ... again this is simply deceptive
Diferències · Istoric -1.063 Skepticism: removing deceptive insertions ... please see talk
Diferències · Istoric 267 undo ... I don't see that point made elsewhere at all ... I see a different point about incoherence
All times are in UTC.