Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | Satanic panic (Log · Page History) |
| User | PelleSmith (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 53 |
| Minor edits | 9 (17%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 2 (3.8%) |
| Reverted edits | 6 (11.3%) |
| atbe1 | 8.5 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 2,601 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -8,725 |
Minor edits
·
9 (17%)
Major edits
·
44 (83%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
2 (3.8%)
Manual edits
·
51 (96.2%)
Reverted edits
·
6 (11.3%)
Unreverted edits
·
47 (88.7%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10-09 21:49 | Diff · History | -363 | Undid revision 318948724 by Fassitman (talk) |
| 2009-09-10 12:23 | Diff · History | -851 | remove unecyclopedic additions |
| 2009-08-17 11:38 | Diff · History | 3 | Undid revision 308419125 by 76.95.65.208 (talk) |
| 2008-11-03 02:44 | Diff · History | 37 | I was trying not to be weasely ... the version prior to my change is poorly articulated |
| 2008-11-02 22:27 | Diff · History | 34 | (reverted) →False memories: |
| 2008-10-29 20:10 | Diff · History | 0 | →Michelle Remembers and the McMartin preschool trial: |
| 2008-10-29 20:08 | Diff · History | 0 | →Historical precedents: |
| 2008-10-14 14:39 | Diff · History | -1,894 | undo ... again ... the minority position ALREADY EXISTS a the end of the lead ... references are not needed in the lead ... please take it to talk |
| 2008-10-14 14:20 | Diff · History | -1,894 | (reverted) undo ... the position is already covered in the last sentence ... the references are only needed in the body of the entry where this is fleshed out |
| 2008-10-09 00:46 | Diff · History | 462 | revert self ... wrong encyclopedia ... we did discuss this reference before however ... and I'm not entirely sure why it is necessary here at all |
| 2008-10-09 00:40 | Diff · History | -462 | (reverted) the chapter of the encyclopedia is not describing the same concept ... this reference has been discussed and I have reviewed it personally ... please do not add it back |
| 2008-10-08 22:05 | Diff · History | -462 | (reverted) that reference is for *sadistic*ritual abuse ... not *satanic* ritual abuse |
| 2008-10-07 14:22 | Diff · History | -509 | undo - please take it to talk ... this is the subject of an edit war |
| 2008-10-06 13:30 | Diff · History | -1,092 | (reverted) please do not edit war ... take it to talk ... the lack of current research has been discussed and the survey cited is entirely misleading and possible unreliable for that information |
| 2008-09-25 14:09 | Diff · History | -86 | discussion requires you wait for a response ... please engage the talk page with others before resorting to this ... a vast majority of us do not agree with you |
| 2008-09-24 20:38 | Diff · History | -86 | (reverted) please take up the complaint on the talk page in detail ... we've been through a lot of discussion there already and consensus is that the mainstream scholarly position is well represented |
| 2008-08-15 12:06 | Diff · History | 240 | →Dissociative identity disorder: The rumour spreading accusation, if only made by one source, is a BLP concern, but this other one clearly is not, and is also clearly pertinent |
| 2008-08-15 12:00 | Diff · History | 30 | →False memories: attributing |
| 2008-08-08 22:42 | Diff · History | 142 | →As a moral panic: |
| 2008-08-08 22:36 | Diff · History | 12 | →Pseudo-satanism: |
| 2008-08-08 22:35 | Diff · History | 58 | →Cult-based abuse: more editing |
| 2008-08-08 22:27 | Diff · History | 34 | some basic editing ... also "ritual abuse" is often simply interchangable with SRA and has none of the "nuance" ascribed to the later terminology |
| 2008-08-06 11:29 | Diff · History | 247 | undo ... please explain on talk ... |
| 2008-08-06 11:13 | Diff · History | -35 | undo -- we have reliable sources for this ... you have no current reliable sources to contend that this isn't the mainstream POV ... take it to talk |
| 2008-08-05 21:33 | Diff · History | -229 | →Skepticism: |
| 2008-08-05 21:33 | Diff · History | 248 | →Evidence: |
| 2008-08-05 21:19 | Diff · History | 74 | |
| 2008-08-04 13:32 | Diff · History | -24 | →History: removing red herring tag ... and btw the original term "believer" shows up all over the literature ... and could be cited to no stance, middle ground sources ... is that preferable? |
| 2008-08-04 12:36 | Diff · History | -15 | →Skepticism: |
| 2008-08-04 12:35 | Diff · History | 263 | →Skepticism: adding ref |
| 2008-08-04 11:27 | Diff · History | -657 | remove ... this has nothing to do with "research" ... reporting on the claims of patients before anyone knew what was going on ... hardly accounts for research |
| 2008-08-03 19:08 | Diff · History | -5 | →Court cases: |
| 2008-08-03 19:07 | Diff · History | 160 | →Court cases: both statements were from the same source ... tried to clarify them. |
| 2008-07-22 04:52 | Diff · History | -957 | →Research: people opinion on hypothetical situations is complete hearsay and has no business in a wikipedia entry ... and Area 51 "could" "possibly" contain aliens |
| 2008-07-21 13:46 | Diff · History | 42 | →History: NOT OR ... please explain on talk ... by no means do a majority of "therapists" advocate this position, so specificity is a must |
| 2008-07-18 17:19 | Diff · History | 70 | →Research: someone who has the Bibby reference needs to look this up ... the old wording is most likely not correct unless he supports a specific POV himself |
| 2008-07-18 17:11 | Diff · History | -415 | →Research: as already mentioned above the eyewitness recanted |
| 2008-07-18 16:53 | Diff · History | 38 | →History: qualifying the adocates as with the skeptics |
| 2008-07-18 16:48 | Diff · History | 55 | →History: Clarifying skeptics |
| 2008-07-18 04:33 | Diff · History | 9 | →Polarization: This sentence needs a serious rewrite -- it falaciously equates the claims for and against based on "no evidence" ... something that actually supports the claims against |
| 2008-07-18 04:28 | Diff · History | 9 | →History: lets be clear ... |
| 2008-07-18 04:27 | Diff · History | -923 | →History: remove weasely "could be" should be would be ... besides it has nothing to do with the "history" |
| 2008-07-18 04:25 | Diff · History | -19 | →History: remove duplicate reference |
| 2008-07-18 04:23 | Diff · History | -160 | →History: |
| 2008-07-18 04:21 | Diff · History | 36 | →History: various clarifications |
| 2008-07-18 04:13 | Diff · History | -6 | →History: often? when have they ever been substantiated past testimony? ... contradicted all over this entry and is clearly misleading as well as weasely |
| 2008-07-18 04:08 | Diff · History | 18 | this is better |
| 2008-07-18 04:04 | Diff · History | 25 | →Cult-based abuse: Original wikilink leads to the confusion of Satanism as an actual religious practice with "Satanism |
| 2008-07-18 03:58 | Diff · History | 6 | →Cult-based abuse: clarify ... not just the second set of claims |
| 2008-07-18 03:47 | Diff · History | 16 | this link is more appropriate |
| 2008-07-18 03:35 | Diff · History | -514 | →Skepticism: remove unrelated commnetary by Kent ... once again, nothing that actually deals with the veracity of the claims ... again this is simply deceptive |
| 2008-07-17 04:53 | Diff · History | -1,063 | →Skepticism: removing deceptive insertions ... please see talk |
| 2008-07-16 20:56 | Diff · History | 267 | undo ... I don't see that point made elsewhere at all ... I see a different point about incoherence |
All times are in UTC.