User talk:Soulbust/Archive 3

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article SourceFed you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Samwalton9 -- Samwalton9 (talk) 14:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

The article SourceFed you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:SourceFed for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. I'll be sticking around on the GA page to help you! Samwalton9 (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Internet Icon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Internet Icon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Otterathome (talk) 11:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

The article Landon Moss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable. coverage is not sufficiently significant

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dlohcierekim 04:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Could you assign some categories to this template page? It shows up, with a few other pages, as uncategorized. Since you have done so much editing work on it, I'm reluctant to assign categories myself as I'm unfamiliar with the program. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:51, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

The article NFL: The Top 100 Players of 2011 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copyrighted list that fails WP:NLIST and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 18:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

The article NFL: The Top 100 Players of 2012 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copyrighted list that fails WP:NLIST and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 18:39, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

The article NFL: The Top 100 Players of 2013 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Copyrighted list that fails WP:NLIST and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Secret ^account 18:40, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

 Template:Cleveland sports curse has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Secret ^account 18:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Can you please stop separating philly content and creating entire new pages on everything he does. It is very annoying as maintaining the quality of articles becomes more difficult. Read WP:PAGESIZE and WP:PERMASTUB. Thank you.--Alizaa2 (talk) 10:51, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited YouTube Rewind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harlem Shake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

 Template:YouTube Top 20 Subscribed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Otterathome (talk) 20:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 United States Presidential election YouTube parodies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 United States Presidential election YouTube parodies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Otterathome (talk) 20:04, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

 Template:NBA All-Star Celebrity Game MVP Award has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Otterathome (talk) 06:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

 Template:$1Billion Films has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.

(Please also see the template's talk page for my reasons for the above.)

--Fru1tbat (talk) 18:21, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 02:46, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

 Template:PDNM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alizaa2 (talk) 10:10, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Soulbust
Are you aware that, despite your username (apparently) being changed some time ago, when 'you' created Phil DeFranco Networks & Merchandise the edit history says it was created by Soulbust (talk · contribs)? See here. --220 of ^Borg 12:56, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Reply copied from my talkpage. Keeps discussion in one place.220 of ^Borg 13:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi there. To respond to the message you left on my talk page, I created that page. I still have access to the "soulbust" account, and I actually made a request to change my name back to that username. After realizing that I created the article on that account, I realized the confusion that could cause, but I have no real idea what to about that or my username. I do have access to both the soulbust and bobcatwaterlion accounts, and I edit on the latter, but what I want to do is have my contributions and username to be registered under the soulbust account, as the previously were. I figure that if that can't be done, however, that it would be fine to keep having them registered on the bobcatwaterlion account. Bobcatwaterlion (talk) 13:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

From what you say it appears you have not had a username change from "Soulbust" to "Bobcatwaterlion"? Yes, rather confusing! I think you need to take a look at Template:User alternative account banner and Template:User alternative account master. Editing from more than one account without being transparent about it could get you in strife. See WP:VALIDALT for policy info.

I'm not sure what you need to do about assigning or re-assigning your edits to one account, but wp:Changing username may be a place to ask, or a friendly Administrator should have an idea. ---220 of ^Borg 13:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nerdfighteria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulcan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SourceFed hosts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nerdist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

The article Baracka Flacka Flames has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability requirements as a youtube series.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Church ^Talk 03:35, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Island of Lemurs: Madagascar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3D. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Soulbust,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Esther Earl should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Earl .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep 20:10, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SourceFed hosts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SourceFed hosts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Otterathome (talk) 12:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SourceFed hosts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maxim. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

hello i follow the pewdiepie article and see you made CutiePieMarzia

but excluding blogs, primary sources and articles focused on 'PewDiePie', the only other sources are Il Giornale di Vicenza article[1] which is a local italian paper and a top 5 italian youtubers list at Tecnocino.it[2] which is a tech magazine.

do you have anymore? i think it should just be part of pewdiepie page..--JacktheHarry (talk) 20:05, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CutiePieMarzia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:05, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Green brothers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Emma. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 Template:Smosh has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 117Avenue (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Green brothers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Episcopalian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Personally, I'd think the philosopher tag is just for people best known as philosophers or nonfiction authors, but I don't have a problem with 21st century philosophers. Hell, if they include Anne Rice, then the door is open.

I was supposed to get to meet John Green once...but he was SICK that day. Czolgolz (talk) 04:20, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Very true, but so does Yogi Bera. Just about everyone has a personal philosophy. Czolgolz (talk) 04:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Please don't do this. Your reasoning seems to argue that it could be placed on every article to do with biology, history, archaeology, geology, etc. Dougweller (talk) 16:42, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Project for Awesome may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• abbreviated '''P4A''') is a community-driven charitable movement on [[YouTube]], created by the [[Green brothers], [[Hank Green|Hank]] and [[John Green (author)|John]], most notable for their [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

 Template:Billboard Social 50 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Otterathome (talk) 18:46, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Martí MAST 6-12 Academy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Swimming and Cross Country. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dual-threat quarterback, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nike, Los Angeles Express and Derek Carr. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 11 December 2014 (UTC)