Soulbust

Category:YouTube channels by year has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MSMST1543 (talk) 02:42, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dual-threat quarterback you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Soulbust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rican Da Menace, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Kiriko sign language.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Be Sweet you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nkon21 -- Nkon21 (talk) 04:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Soulbust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prestige horror, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Overwatch and Talk:Overwatch (video game) archives are messed up. Thank you. — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:34, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Soulbust, I've now completed my c/e. If the subject is most-commonly known as Rezz, that name should be used throughout the article except where you need to provide context. If the subject is most-commonly known as Rezazadeh, the article should be moved to that title, which currently redirects to Hossein Rezazadeh. Anyway, good luck with the article. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Swedish emigrants to Japan has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 11:44, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Soulbust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lindsay Nikole, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:06, 26 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Aurora Gaming logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Be Sweet you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Be Sweet for comments about the article, and Talk:Be Sweet/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nkon21 -- Nkon21 (talk) 08:02, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of Zer0 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 03:34, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Reject esports logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 00:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

FMSky (talk) 07:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

RoySmith (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

RoySmith (talk) 00:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:Fox Sports 1 people has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Let'srun (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

TheSandDoctor ^Talk 00:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 3 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Goldfish Matisse.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. grendel|khan 08:33, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading this image, which is used on its own article. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:46, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The character's page wasn't like this when I left, which is what happened there. It doesn't make sense, I need to edit and give reasons, why is the page semi protected? Claun11342 (talk) 17:32, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Spider-Woman (Gwen Stacy) in ASTV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Gwen Stacy (Into the Spider-Verse).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dual-threat quarterback you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 03:43, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Soulbust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rezzmau5, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:06, 7 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Starship Troopers, Extermination - cover art.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

TWOrantula^TM (enter the web) 17:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Category:YouTube podcasters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:25, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

you are a flop hating daboyz. there are other references about floptok 👁👄👁🤮🥑👄🥑🥰🥰🥰😍😍😍 AirbusA330772673 (talk) 04:54, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

They would have to be reliable ones. Soulbust (talk) 22:30, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia have a lot of flop hate. I am threatening to quit. Do not let Newgens, Nextgens, DaBoyz and DaGurlz take over Wikipedia #WAP AirbusA330772673 (talk) 06:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

You absolutely SHOULD NOT have done this split without even raising it on the talk page. Don't do something like this again. And archive your talk FFS. Johnbod (talk) 00:58, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Johnbod:

Why are you yelling? You could have gone ahead and started a civil discussion on the relevant articles' talk pages and ping me, instead of coming on to my talk page in this manner.

I'm not new here. So I can't say you're doing this, but nevertheless, you could have opened up this discussion differently. Also, not really sure you should outright tell someone they shouldn't do something that... *checks notes* ... is totally allowed, valid, and even encouraged to do on here (per WP:BOLD). My split was not disruptive, and is definitely sensible to do. The bronze and marble pieces are completely different pieces and each have substantial sourcing to support their own article.

On the split, how was it "incompetent" or "low quality" (as you stated on your edit summaries)? Because I didn't do the slight tweaks you made within the same day that I did the split? I fully intended on further editing article, but had to tend to some offline things today. I get that I did not utilize the word-for-word procedure listed here, but I left edit summaries explaining what was being split. Again, I intend to further edit the marble piece's article and fix linking issues that can arise after a split, as well as address steps 5 through 8 on that procedure.

"Archive your talk". If you're referring to my talk page, then uhhhh it already is. Oh and "FFS". That, paired with your "incompetent" and "low quality" comments, feel very snide in nature toward me. Will look past it since I really just want to focus on the actual article editing on here but didn't appreciate those comments. I would rather you just speak to me like a fellow volunteer editor, as we all are on this website (See WP:ETIQ and WP:DOOR).

I can see by your user page that you appreciate editing art/art history articles. So do I. So, try not to lose the plot on here. Gonna get to fixing those linking issues now, and after that, whether today or later in the week, continue any tweaking/cleaning-up of the articles (particularly the marble piece).

Soulbust (talk) 03:14, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Very unmoved by this! The "plot" here is try to get you not to do any more drastic changes to highly viewed pages without bothering to raise it on the talk page first. It's just comical that you say "You could have gone ahead and started a civil discussion on the relevant articles' talk pages and ping me"! If you think WP:BOLD encourages this sort of thing, you are very much mistaken. Someone else has already fixed the dozens of linking changes needed. Given the quality of what you left, please DON'T "continue any tweaking/cleaning-up of the articles". Please! Johnbod (talk) 02:04, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Johnbod Bruh. The marble piece page is (almost) entirely the exact same as it was before. I did a total split, and have just cleaned up some minor things. If you're upset about the quality of it, it is almost certainly something that was present in the marble piece's section on the previous article prior to me splitting it. It's actually one of the reasons I went for the split in the first place, as the information regarding the marble David can be improved a good amount.

It's subjective too, but I don't think <300 page views per day is "highly viewed". But that's irrelevant. WP:BOLD does in fact encourage this sort of thing, as per "This page in a nutshell: Go for it."

And I'll actually definitely continue to edit the marble piece article, and any other article I want to because anyone can, as long as it is constructive and aiming to improve the already-existing content. That's something I have regularly done over the years I've been on editing on here. It's rather insulting you try and demand me to not edit, and try to assert that demand based on "the quality of what [I] have left", as if that quality can't be improved through further edits.

Now do you have any objection to the actual split, content wise, because if not, then the change isn't so "drastic" is it? Just a straight-forward split. And if you do have an issue, then suggesting you start a discussion on the talk pages of the statues isn't so "comical" either? So if you do, go and reply to the topic I left on the bronze piece's talk page?

If you want to criticize that I didn't do all of the wikilinking fixes post-split, or that I was sloppy about it in other parts of the procedure, that's fine. It was late for me, had to deal with real-life responsibilities, and I figured I could address those things the next time I got online (which I did: talk pages now reflect that the split was made, have made some further clean-up edits, and also, while I do see that another editor handled a lot of the linking fixes, I actually did do some of that myself when I got back online).

But, again, do you have any issues with the content or are you just going to be unnecessarily mean to me on my talk page? Would rather you leave me alone if the latter. Thanks, Soulbust (talk) 04:36, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Very happy to leave you alone if there are no more messes cropping up on my watchlist. If there are, I may be BOLD, and complain. Johnbod (talk) 13:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Johnbod

You're not gonna intimidate me dude. I know the split I performed was not anything to talk to me like this over. For someone so experienced on this website, you sure seem to have forgotten WP:5P3 and WP:5P4.

"Messes cropping up". It was one split, dude. A split that again, has had its post-split technical considerations addressed, and one that you haven't actually raised a content-based issue with on either of the proper channels. Soulbust (talk) 19:27, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:First Things First logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Soulbust. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Prestige horror".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article Dual-threat quarterback you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Dual-threat quarterback for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kimikel -- Kimikel (talk) 04:43, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, Soulbust! Just wanted to inform you that a while back I brainstormed in my sandbox for a future iHasCupquake article. Most of its sourcing is iffy when it comes to guidelines, but there is valuable information for you to use that would make the article much more informative! There is also a free-to-use image for it as well. Thank you for your time.

Here it is: User:BOITOTHEBOI/sandbox

Have a nice day. BOITOTHEBOI (talk) 01:16, 14 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, sorry for the delayed response. Thank you for the idea here! And the image will be useful for sure :)

Soulbust (talk) 08:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Soulbust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blazer5 Gaming, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Soulbust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jazz Gaming, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Soulbust. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Heat Check Gaming, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)Reply