User talk:Patapsco913
|
||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 15 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 40 sections are present. |
A page you started (Jack Rudin) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Jack Rudin, Patapsco913!
Wikipedia editor Missionedit just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment on Missionedit's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
April editathons at Women in Red
[edit]Deletion discussion about Isaac Hager
[edit]Hello, Patapsco913,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Isaac Hager should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at [1].
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
January 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
GCatholic.org article
[edit]Type of site | Religious |
|---|---|
| Available in | English |
| Created by | Gabriel Chow |
| URL | http://www.gcatholic.org/ |
| Commercial | No |
| Launched | December 8, 1997 |
| Current status | Active |
GCatholic.org is an nonprofit organization the provides comprehensive information about the Catholic Church[2][3][4] via its online database of bishops and dioceses of the Roman Catholic Church and Eastern Catholic Churches. The website is not officially sanctioned by the Church. It is run as a private project by Gabriel Chow, journalist for Salt + Light Television, in Toronto. It also provides information about the performance of the Catholic Church itself in different countries and territories and provides biographical information on current and former bishops of each diocese, such as dates of birth, ordination, and (where applicable) death. When created, the site name was Giga-Catholic Information due to the fact that there are around 1 billion Catholics in the world (billion = giga).[5] It is used as a source for information on Catholic bishops and diocese, current and historical, by various news organizations[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and authors.
References
[edit]- ^ "gcatholic.org Site Info". Alexa Internet. Retrieved October 4, 2019.
- ^ Smith, Cara (August 20, 2019). "Priest returns to country he loves that's now grappling with 'economic apartheid'". The Hawk (newspaper) .
- ^ "David Cheney – człowiek, który stworzył światowy katalog biskupów". pl:Katolicka Agencja Informacyjna (in Polish). 29 October 2016.
Należy dodać, że Catholic Hierarchy nie jest jedynym portalem internetowym, przynoszącym ogół wiadomości o biskupach katolickich – żyjących i zmarłych – na świecie. Istnieją jeszcze co najmniej dwie podobne strony: anglojęzyczna GigaCatholic (gcatholic.org ) i niemieckojezyczna Apostolische Nachfolge (apostolische-nachfolge.de).
- ^ "GCatholic.org provides extensive info regarding the Roman Catholic instituton including Documents". Call to Action. October 23, 2020.
GCatholic.org (formerly Giga-Catholic Information) is a non-profit website aimed at providing comprehensive and useful information of the Universal Catholic Church for all Catholics in the world. The site is maintained and owned by Gabriel Chow, who resides in Toronto, Canada
- ^ Chow, Gabriel. "About Us". GCatholic.org. Retrieved October 4, 2019. [self-published]
- ^ Brockhaus, Hannah (September 12, 2018). "Pope convokes world-wide meeting of bishops on abuse crisis". Catholic News Agency.
- ^ Zorraquin i Calaytayud, Jorge (February 26, 2020). "La Colegiata del Santo Sepulcro de Calatayud se postula para ser basílica". Heraldo de Aragón (in Spanish).
- ^ "Ksiądz z Dolnego Śląska zostanie biskupem w Australii. "To wielkie wyzwanie"". Gazeta Wyborcza (in Polish). September 3, 2020.
- ^ Brenner, Lisa (March 5, 2013). "Cardinal Mahony defends handling of pedophile priests; Former Pope Benedict's legal immunity examined". KPCC.
- ^ "Apostolic Nuncio: Vatican appoints Julio Murat to Cameroon". Cameroon Radio Television. March 24, 2018.
- ^ Fernandez Sanabria, Alejandro; Cucho, Antonio (November 23, 2016). "Mientras pierde seguidores, la Iglesia Católica dispara su producción de santos". Univision (in Spanish).
- ^ Bate, Sturmius Teofanus (April 8, 2019). "Sejarah 4 Basilika Kepausan di Kota Roma, Italia". kumparan.com (in Indonesian).
- ^ Nkurunziza, Michel (January 14, 2020). "Inside proposed Kibeho Basilica". The New Times.
- ^ Brockhaus, Hannah (September 12, 2019). "Pope Francis Convokes Worldwide Meeting of Bishops on Abuse Crisis". The Irish Catholic.
- ^ Mares, Courtney (November 23, 2020). "Franciscan friar named cardinal says he is taking a leap into the deep". Catholic News Agency.
- ^ Diamant, Jeff (November 23, 2020). "Under Pope Francis, the College of Cardinals has become less European". Pew Research Center.
Data on cardinals from Press Office of the Holy See, catholic-hierarchy.org, and gcatholic.org,
External links
[edit]
References
[edit]External links
[edit]Can you please review my suggested edit on the pierre kory talk page?
[edit]I am looking for other editors who expressed interest in the topic to have a look at my proposed more neutral edit. Would you mind having a look? I am trying to reach some kind of consensus before I post.
Disambiguation link notification for February 9
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mayor of Asbury Park, New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Journal.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Leticia Vasquez for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leticia Vasquez, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leticia Vasquez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Adjacent communities template
[edit]Thank you for all of your efforts to expand details regarding 2020 census data to articles in New Jersey and around the country. I saw that you had edited the article for Berkeley Heights, New Jersey, and had added a "hand-drawn" map using links and symbols of surrounding communities. I edited the article and you may want to make use of the Template:Adjacent communities as an alternative that handles the spacing and positioning. Alansohn (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manny Cid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Note regarding copying within Wikipedia
[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of mayors of Lynwood, California. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. I thought I added enough but I will redo. Cheers! Patapsco913 (talk) 04:47, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Talk page archiving
[edit]Hello. I notice you have a lot of talk page sections. Would you like me to set up automatic bot archiving for you? This will leave around 40 sections and put the rest in /Archive X subpages. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- That would be nice. Thank you! Patapsco913 (talk) 03:50, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Great. I set it up just now. Give it a day or two to run :) –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:29, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2024
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary or a comment in an edit to Taylor Swift that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ippantekina (talk) 05:19, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beaumont, Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Orange Leader.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi, what do you mean by "ce" in this edit summary? Also how is this article within scope of WikiProject Women in Red? Also, please note that project does not use importance ratings. Thanks — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donny Deutsch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 17
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gentrification of Chicago, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bucktown.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Lamar Thorpe for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lamar Thorpe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lamar Thorpe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of census-designated places in Texas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron County.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Please check my talk page message at Middle Eastern Americans
[edit]Hi, please check my talk page message at Middle Eastern Americans. Alexysun (talk) 21:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 2 § Families by person
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 2 § Families by person on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MClay1 (talk) 11:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Excessive citations to population boxes?
[edit]Hi, Patapsco. I notice you're adding many citations to population boxes for places around California. While giving references for the data in the boxes is good, it looks like you've been adding citations to old census records that aren't even used in the boxes. For example, in Twin Lakes, Mono County, California, you cited census data going all the way back to 1870, but there is only data for 2020 (when the CDP was created).
Would it be possible to only give citations for data that appears in the box, rather than all possible old census citations? Thanks very much! — hike395 (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hello User talk:Hike395. Just wondering then. How can I make a statement that the entity has not appeared in prior censuses unless I include the prior censuses? In the past, I have had people removing my statement since they say it is unsupported. So I started adding the prior censuses so people can confirm what I am saying. California is the first state where people have objected (probably my fault since I added the information prior to updating the CDP for ease of updating; and the process is slower as CDPs seem to have been somewhat neglected in Caly...heck there is not even a full list of CDPs...just the largest). I guess I could put a direct statement in there that "xxxx has not appeared in a census until it was listed as a a xxxx in xxxx census" and add the citations but it seemed more appropriate to keep them in the population box. They way I have been working is to keep all the census PDFs open and make sure the name has not appeared in the past; and then add when it first appeared. cheers!Patapsco913 (talk) 07:31, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- When a piece of data is not in Wikipedia, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. That just means it hasn't been added yet. You don't have to prove that the 1870 data for Twin Falls doesn't exist. Another editor has to prove that if they add it, it can be verified.
- Similarly, I don't think it is possible to cite to a negative claim. Just because a piece of data isn't in a citation, that doesn't prove that it doesn't exist. Again, I don't think you need to prove that data doesn't exist. But even if you did feel that, you would need to find a reliable source that states that it doesn't exist, rather than trying to cite to all possible primary sources which don't have the data.
- In other words, I think you are safe and don't need to add the big string of citations. — hike395 (talk) 13:14, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm. I get your point but you are applying it very broadly and not specifically to census data. I am not adding 'all' the sources that say it is not listed in the census; rather I am just adding those few additional references from the US Census where it would have been listed ( where a necessary check would have to be done to be thorough when cleaning up the census portion of the page) and allow anyone to easily verify as much. Look at Moorpark, California#Demographics. I know that it is listed as an unincorporated place in the 1950 U.S. Census, but it is not listed here. Nobody has bothered to check since they likely think the list is definitive (and look at the laughable citation provided https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census.html - basically impossible for the average editor to verify). So it lingers as unverified or gets deleted by an editor). The other problem is that California will be different from other state projects where the data is included. Patapsco913 (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- My main point is you don't need to cite the absence of data in Wikipedia. Think about all of the data for infoboxes across WP! It would be an incredible burden to make a citation for all of the blank fields. The Verifiability guideline says citations are need to support material, not the fact that material is missing. — hike395 (talk) 14:30, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hmmm. I get your point but you are applying it very broadly and not specifically to census data. I am not adding 'all' the sources that say it is not listed in the census; rather I am just adding those few additional references from the US Census where it would have been listed ( where a necessary check would have to be done to be thorough when cleaning up the census portion of the page) and allow anyone to easily verify as much. Look at Moorpark, California#Demographics. I know that it is listed as an unincorporated place in the 1950 U.S. Census, but it is not listed here. Nobody has bothered to check since they likely think the list is definitive (and look at the laughable citation provided https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/decennial-census.html - basically impossible for the average editor to verify). So it lingers as unverified or gets deleted by an editor). The other problem is that California will be different from other state projects where the data is included. Patapsco913 (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Majority-minority cities and towns in in McHenry County, Illinois has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Majority-minority cities and towns in in McHenry County, Illinois has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Regards, SONIC678 05:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lulu Garcia-Navarro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Cut.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A Chicago Barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Chicago Barnstar | |
| Hello Patapsco913, I saw and appreciated your edits on the Gentrification of Chicago article. I'm working on an article that needs editing and input: Draft:Gentrification of New York City, if you have the time and interest, please take a look. Wil540 art (talk) 05:04, 12 November 2024 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 18:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Durham WikiProject
[edit] | Hello, it appears that you have some knowledge of Durham, North Carolina. WikiProject Durham NC would like to invite you to join us and expand Wikipedia's information on Durham. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 06:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC) |