User talk:Augustios Paleo

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Camarasaurus lentus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carnegie Museum. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent work on pages related to the Morrison Formation has been really good, keep it up! Cheers, -TimTheDragonRider (talk) 08:44, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I’ll keep up the good work, currently working on Diplodocus and then I will start redoing the Dystrophaeus & Suuwassea pages as they aren’t very detailed. Great job on the Morrison Paleobiota list overhaul so far, it’s looking great! Augustios Paleo (talk) 19:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! TimTheDragonRider (talk) 19:53, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Augustios Paleo! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Glyptotherium that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Augustios Paleo, your recent edit to the Good Article nominations page was undone by the bot that builds the page: that isn't how you go about nominating an article. Please see the GA instructions page for the way to go about nominating Glyptotherium. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions or need assistance. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:53, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Augustios Paleo! Your additions to Xenodens have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. CC BY-NC-ND is not a compatible license. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mymoorapelta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 10:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice addition. However, you added ref tags for :1 and Cartelle2, but without supplying the actual ref. Please resolve this. Thanks! - UtherSRG (talk) 18:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Cryolophosaurus into Glacialisaurus. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Glacialisaurus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:LiornisfloweriAmeghino1895Types.PNG. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Glyptotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reaper Eternal -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:40, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Glyptotherium you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Glyptotherium for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Reaper Eternal -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 20:40, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Glacialisaurus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Glacialisaurus for comments about the article, and Talk:Glacialisaurus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pi.1415926535 -- Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:24, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Glyptotherium you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Glyptotherium for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reaper Eternal -- Reaper Eternal (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 December 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Glacialisaurus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Glacialisaurus, meaning 'icy lizard', got its name from its discovery site in the Beardmore Glacier? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Glacialisaurus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Glacialisaurus), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mymoorapelta you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mymoorapelta for comments about the article, and Talk:Mymoorapelta/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit this page directly. The bot adds and removes nominations and will get confused if people add things. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:49, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Glyptotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PrimalMustelid -- PrimalMustelid (talk) 07:01, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Glyptotherium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Glyptotherium for comments about the article, and Talk:Glyptotherium/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PrimalMustelid -- PrimalMustelid (talk) 03:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ortotherium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:41, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ortotherium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ortotherium for comments about the article, and Talk:Ortotherium/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:03, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Titanis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PrimalMustelid -- PrimalMustelid (talk) 02:21, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trinisaura, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Haya and Brevis muscle.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from Apatosaurus to Brontosaurus. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 01:36, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 30.3% Stub-Class
• 12.1% Start-Class
• 6.1% C-Class
• 6.1% B-Class
• 6.1% GA-Class
• 39.4% remaining

edit | discuss

Glyptodont

33 articles

Asterostemma

Boreostemma

Castellanosia

Clypeotherium

Daedicuroides

Doedicurus

Eleutherocercus

Eucinepeltus

Glyptatelus

Glyptodon

Glyptodontidium

Glyptostracon

Glyptotherium

Heteroglyptodon

Hoplophorus

Kelenkura

Lomaphorus

Metopotoxus

Neosclerocalyptus

Neuryurus

Palaehoplophorus

Panochthus

Paraeucinepeltus

Parapropalaehoplophorus

Plaxhaplous

Prodaedicurus

Propalaehoplophorus

Protoglyptodon

Pseudoneothoracophorus

Sclerocalyptus

Stromatherium

Xiphuroides

Good luck and happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 10% Stub-Class
• 70% Start-Class
• 20% remaining

edit | discuss

Pampatheriidae

10 articles

Holmesina

Kraglievichia

Machlydotherium

Pampatherium

Plaina

Scirrotherium

Tonnicinctus

Vassallia

Yuruatherium

Managed to make this one pretty quickly. Happy editing, SilverTiger12 (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Titanis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Titanis for comments about the article, and Talk:Titanis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PrimalMustelid -- PrimalMustelid (talk) 19:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Imperobator you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 02:03, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Imperobator you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Imperobator for comments about the article, and Talk:Imperobator/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 15:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brontosaurus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Morrison Man -- The Morrison Man (talk) 17:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Glyptodon you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PrimalMustelid -- PrimalMustelid (talk) 00:23, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- it looks like you have an unclosed strike tag at the FAC? More importantly, though, it looks like you're striking reviewer's comments? The convention is that you let the reviewer strike them -- that way the reviewer can decided for themselves if an issue has been addressed. I would suggest undoing those edits, which will also fix the strike tag. Not all reviewers strike, and there's no need to worry about it -- it's the Support that matters, not whether there are unstruck comments. Re the outstanding point: my fourth bullet, re 1a/1b and the use of "former". Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I have fixed this point. Thank you! AFH (talk) 21:47, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trinisaura you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 17:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trinisaura you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trinisaura for comments about the article, and Talk:Trinisaura/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 01:20, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Glyptodon you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Glyptodon for comments about the article, and Talk:Glyptodon/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PrimalMustelid -- PrimalMustelid (talk) 02:23, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tylocephale you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZooBlazer -- ZooBlazer (talk) 23:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tylocephale you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tylocephale and Talk:Tylocephale/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZooBlazer -- ZooBlazer (talk) 06:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tylocephale you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tylocephale for comments about the article, and Talk:Tylocephale/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ZooBlazer -- ZooBlazer (talk) 16:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Panthera onca mesembrina you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 18:21, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Panthera onca mesembrina you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Panthera onca mesembrina for comments about the article, and Talk:Panthera onca mesembrina/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 19:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Augustios Paleo, as you are currently doing extensive work on various Antarctic dinosaurs, I thought if you could help me with a possible expansion of the article regarding the mosasaur Kaikaifilu, and more particularly its "palaeoecology" section. Indeed, although I think I have gone through all that has to be said about the Lopez de Bertodano Formation, I think I have missed some elements concerning him, which is why I am asking you for help. Cordially, Amirani1746 (talk) 17:57, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I’ll work on the paleoecology and I have some edits that I think could help in the description section. AFH (talk) 19:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Augustios Paleo, thanks a lot for the answer, still waiting for the results ! Amirani1746 (talk) 06:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll get to that later today. AFH (talk) 12:40, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Put in some info on the formation. If you think I should add more let me know, but I think this is sufficient for a paleoenvironment section. AFH (talk) 01:50, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Augustios Paleo I think it's very well developed (and thank you for that), but miscellaneous information, it looks like it had dinosaurs, just like in the Snow Hill Island Formation with Taniwhasaurus. Amirani1746 (talk) 07:20, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Augustios Paleo. Thank you for your work on Lasiorhinus angustidens. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 09:54, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Antarctopelta you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Antarctopelta you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Antarctopelta for comments about the article, and Talk:Antarctopelta/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Titanoboa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 23:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Titanoboa you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Titanoboa for comments about the article, and Talk:Titanoboa/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 20:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to integrate Wikipedia:WikiProject Dinosaurs and Wikipedia:WikiProject Extinction how to do?

L'étudiant en pal (talk) 17:49, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voulez-vous fusionner les projets ? ces projets doivent être séparés AFH (talk) 19:07, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Brontosaurus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brontosaurus for comments about the article, and Talk:Brontosaurus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Morrison Man -- The Morrison Man (talk) 20:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Quarter Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Brontosaurus (estimated annual readership: 384,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 01:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Half Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Titanoboa (estimated annual readership: 607,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 01:55, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! AFH (talk) 07:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Brontosaurus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Andrew🐉(talk) 20:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No formally published refutations of the study have been made and it is largely the consensus for sauropod paleontology. Also, I speak specifically of Tschopp et Al’s study, so this would still adhere to that rule. AFH (talk) 07:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tylocephale, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Tylocephale possibly used their domed skulls to fight one another? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tylocephale. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tylocephale), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Carcharodontosaurus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 22:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Augustios Paleo! The article you nominated, Titanis, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:05, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carcharodontosaurus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Carcharodontosaurus for comments about the article, and Talk:Carcharodontosaurus/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SilverTiger12 -- SilverTiger12 (talk) 15:41, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Amargatitanis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Working Man's Barnstar
	We really appreciate that you reviewed several GANs during the drive. Due in part to your efforts, the backlog of unreviewed nominations was reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Apatosaurinae. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 11:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Augustios Paleo. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Brontosaurus.
Message added 02:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:50, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made a comment there AFH (talk) 13:00, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Amargatitanis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Amargatitanis for comments about the article, and Talk:Amargatitanis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Apatosaurinae you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 03:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you've been working a lot on Tree of Life related articles in the past month; maybe you'd like to note your contributions at the Tree of Life Contest? AryKun (talk) 15:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Emmanuel Tschopp requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Apatosaurinae you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Apatosaurinae for comments about the article, and Talk:Apatosaurinae/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 01:02, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 9 November 2023. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 9, 2023, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2023. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 13:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 October 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brontosaurus, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a Brontosaurus stamp led to the United States Postal Service being accused of "fostering scientific illiteracy"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brontosaurus. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brontosaurus), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 5 September 2024. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/September 2024, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 2024. Please keep an eye on that page, as comments regarding the draft blurb may be left there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before the article appears on the Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work!—Wehwalt (talk) 19:01, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for the article, "about Titanis walleri, an extinct genus of terror bird. I have been working on this article for several months and it got promoted to good article status today. This is a vital-class article, so I am nominating it for featured article status. I also have used alt text in addition to colorblind-friendly colors when making the article to make it more widely usable." I hope that you enjoy your TFA day! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:01, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

extinct titans

Thank you for quality articles for millions of readers such as Titanis, Brontosaurus, Titanoboa and Glacialisaurus, writing in collaboration, for a clear modest user page, for quality reviewing, for accepting reviewers' suggestions, - August, you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2953 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]