User talk:AndyScott
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
File tagging File:Ashridge The Bonar Law College.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Ashridge The Bonar Law College.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ashridge The Bonar Law College.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, bjh21 (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:The Ashridge Journal Autumn 1938 Vol 35 38-39.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:The Ashridge Journal Autumn 1938 Vol 35 38-39.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
- File:The Ashridge Journal Autumn 1938 Vol 35 36-37.jpg
- File:The Ashridge Journal Autumn 1938 Vol 35 34-35.jpg
- File:The Ashridge Journal Autumn 1938 Vol 35 32-33.jpg
- File:The Ashridge Journal Autumn 1938 Vol 35 26-27.jpg
- File:The Ashridge Journal Autumn 1938 Vol 35 28-29.jpg
- File:The Ashridge Journal Autumn 1938 Vol 35 30-31.jpg
Yours sincerely, Ronhjones (Talk) 23:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Kew Green, Postcard, about 1930s.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Pewley Down board, by Chantries.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
Polyommatus on Box Hill
[edit]Hi AndyScott, this butterfly is actually a chalkhill blue; can you please make the correction? --LamBoet (talk) 08:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- Just so you know for next time: it was not necessary to re-post the picture, you can always edit the description of the existing one, and request the file to be renamed. Kind regards --LamBoet (talk) 16:28, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:Laurie Scott Baker 2003.jpg
[edit]This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Laurie Scott Baker 2003.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:37, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 10.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 11.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 12.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 14.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 15.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 16.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 17.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 18.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 19.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 2.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 20.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 21.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 22.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 23.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 24.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 26.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 27.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 28.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 29.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 3.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 30.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 31.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 32.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 33.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 34.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 36.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 37.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 38.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 39.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 4.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 40.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 41.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 43.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 44.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 45.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 46.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 47.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 48.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 5.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 50.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 51.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 52.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 53.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 54.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 55.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 56.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 57.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 58.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 59.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 6.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 60.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 61.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 62.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 63.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 64.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 66.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 67.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 68.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 69.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 7.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 70.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 73.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 74.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 75.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 76.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 77.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 78.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 8.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 9.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 Egg Hog 1.jpg
- File:The Big Egg Hunt 2012 Egg Hog 2.jpg
Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 21:42, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Laurie Scott Baker Dec 1969.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:51, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Regent's Park, Girl and Fox, wood carving by Tom Harvey.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
Compton, Guildford
[edit]Thank you for your most welcome quality images, a result of much hard work no doubt. The church deserves an article to itself on Wikipedia which your pics would help to illustrate. Best wishes. There is some unresolved computer glitch which prevents me signing. Best wishes SovalValtos.̴̴̴̴ — Preceding unsigned comment added by SovalValtos (talk • contribs) 10:33, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Masum Reza📞 00:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Masum Reza📞 00:56, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Rotation
[edit]Hello!
Should these files also be rotated?
- File:Isleworth, All Saints churchyard, Ledger stone to Thiele (1813).jpg
- File:Isleworth, All Saints churchyard, Ledger stone dated 1795.jpg
- Jonteemil (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes they could also be rotated.
AndyScott (talk) 19:39, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- Okay, I've requested rotation.Jonteemil (talk) 11:36, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. Next time I'll check them before uploading. AndyScott (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Waterloo, St John's Church, altar and mural by Hans Feibusch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Verbcatcher (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Ashridge, Bonar Law College, week end Easter 1933.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ashridge, Bonar Law College, week end Easter 1933.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Migebert (talk) 11:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
This was taken in 1933 and is a group photo taken to mark an event held showing everyone who attended. It is printed postcard size with no indication of who took it. It was taken before the current copyright law. I don't see that it contains an image with an image. Please explain. AndyScott (talk) 17:56, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
File:Berwick Church The Annunciation By Vanessa Bell c1942.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Youth and Music 18 Nov 1971.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Youth and Music 18 Nov 1971.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
ᴀlbanɢeller (talk) 01:15, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Youth and Music 18 Nov 1971 Programme.jpg
[edit]This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Youth and Music 18 Nov 1971 Programme.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
DMacks (talk) 22:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 01:51, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Trafalgar Square, mermaids on the Beatty Memorial Fountain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 10:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category
[edit]When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:St Paul's, Knightsbridge, nane stained glass. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 05:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
WLM
[edit]Would you mind if I manually added your uploads from this September to Wiki Loves Monuments? I always look forward to seeing your recent architectural photographs. Regards, No Swan So Fine (talk) 14:39, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- That would be fine thanks.
- .... AndyScott (talk) 15:08, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Lewis Gibson Hunt
[edit]Some information here if you wish to link to it. Jackiespeel (talk) 14:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)