Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2015/09/17

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 17th, 2015
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res duplicate of File:Malcolm Turnbull 2014.jpg without any changes done Stemoc 02:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Duplicate, source = wikipedia doesn't work anyway. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, files uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack. BrightRaven (talk) 06:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the image means in Spanish "Always lies". The uploader used this image on es:wp in the article "mythomaniac". So, we can imagine the uploader only wanted to insult someone he knows and we cannot keep this file. BrightRaven (talk) 06:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: My view is that this is likely an attack image and as such can be speedy Herby talk thyme 07:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 08:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User did not create the awards depicted, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

EXIF data shows Author as Mario Poirier, 2011 Copyright - All rights reserved. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Housekeeping, image was deleted by Yann. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong person, see [1]. And duplicate of File:Gustave coriolis.jpg. Yann (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. Yann (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Königsbrück, Stadtmühle 04.JPG

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://donor-tiras-biz.livejournal.com/2892.html Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: CC License @ source http://donor-tiras-biz.livejournal.com/2892.html Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alex9777 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotiunal picture, includes web-addres and screenshot and fair-use material

Motopark (talk) 09:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is promotion-only user. I'll delete all those speedily. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek8150 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. The uploader also added the source of the files, so obvious copyvios. Yann (talk) 12:53, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 04:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some unknown, unnotable, unused person, see description Motopark (talk) 04:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 05:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, per COM:NOTHOST eurodyne (talk) 05:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE eurodyne (talk) 05:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMHO, it is not {{PD-textlogo}}, this image is not trivial. -Туча (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by EugeneZelenko Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work and it's obviously copyrighted. − Meiræ 06:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably a shot from Apple's presentation, so it's not own work and it's obviously copyrighted. − Meiræ 06:25, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: self-portrait Qwertyus (talk) 07:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sidali09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no EXIF data, and maybe not his/here own work. there are an copyvio in one of the 4 photo that this user upload

Vikoula5 (talk) 07:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screengrab from a TV broadcast. No evidence that it is actually the own work of the uploader as claimed. DAJF (talk) 07:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor-quality personal photo with no obvious educational purpose. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user's photo. Art-top (talk) 18:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 17:19, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 08:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 08:32, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:58, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 08:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 08:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, advertising or self-promotion BrightRaven (talk) 09:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Todd3pt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion

BrightRaven (talk) 09:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appeared at http://tbrnews.com/news/manhattan_beach/baja-brewing-company-to-benefit-hurricane-odile-relief-effort/article_0326551e-604f-11e4-9a16-f79405c90637.html in October 2014, previous to its upload here. That page is explicitly marked as copyright. Anne Delong (talk) 12:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, possible hoax. Yann (talk) 13:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, bandspam, del. on de Nolispanmo 13:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:59, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, some IP's removes my Speedy Motopark (talk) 14:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Herbythyme Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Levano46 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously scanned from some undisclosed previous publication. Can't be from 2011. The subject died in 1987. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:01, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and File:Ezequile quinteros.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pupi javier (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maple001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 14:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is not the work of this User. Please see 花見友紀の「鉄道のある日常」 blog date Feb 11, 2008.--アルトクール (talk) 16:39, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete As per the the nominator, the image does appear to have been published on the web before it was uploaded to Commons, and it is doubtful that the uploader is the copyright owner. --DAJF (talk) 23:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor image without any location, context or info, unusable and no educational value. P 1 9 9   16:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo/image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor quality diagram, unusable. P 1 9 9   16:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mendig (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense image, uploaded to vandalize in es:Xavier Alamán Roldán, out of project scope

Ies (talk) 17:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Banfield as no license. Well, there is a CC license tag. But this is very unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. Compare i.e. this google search. JuTa 19:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:03, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flickr source is just a copyright violation of this Getty Image photo. Damiens.rf 19:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Jianhui67 talkcontribs 10:04, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test upload image form Forumlazioultras (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is doubtful that requirement 3 in the licensing is met. Why should it have been in the public domain before URAA? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:44, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work, appears here, and here Aloneinthewild (talk) 20:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 21:43, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work and it's obviously copyrighted. − Meiræ 06:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by user:EugeneZelenko, reason: "Derivative of non-free content: Software screenshot" − Meiræ 23:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:57, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of date 78.145.67.87 09:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Image can be kept as a historical record; please feel free to upload a more modern image. Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per Rodhullandemu Oxyman (talk) 21:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep IMO such rationales as the OP‘s are utterly self-undermining: once something can no longer be photographed, any existing images of it become all the more valuable. An undated photo might be confusing, but that’s not the case here.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope. Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:58, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:04, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:10, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:12, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cyberjhonn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All 6 uploads of this user pertain the same Colombian singer (for whom he’s such a huge fan he deems unnecessary — ¿quizá sacrílego? — to spell out her name): Varying sizes and styles, bogus EXIF, and lack of information suggest a fan’s copyvio. None in use, maybe once in use in Wikipedia, upon upload in jan. 2013, and meanwhile deleted.

-- Tuválkin 17:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of c:File:2015-09-13 1.FFC Frankfurt vs 1.FFC Turbine Potsdam Jackie Groenen 003.jpg and also wrong file information Mad melone (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mmendig (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense image, uploaded to vandalize in es:Xavier Alamán Roldán, out of project scope

Ies (talk) 17:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 11:51, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Buxtehude (talk) 15:27, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:47, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 07:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 15:55, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:19, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 18:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

existing improved picture in better quality Tommes (Roter Frosch) 18:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


Deleted: . Krd 15:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 22:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination --Krd 15:56, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Josve05a (talk) 00:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ♥Golf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP for 3d objects in the USA, artist is still alive. Needs permission directly from the artist.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am the artist's brother and have permission from him to post these on Commons. The 1956 photo of our parents is mine and the original is in my possession. If we need Daniel's approval for the others, tell me what I need to do to satisfy that requirement. He is on a 2-week hunting trip in eastern Montana and won't be back for awhile. --♥Golf (talk) 06:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, we need permission from your brother. Let him have a peek @ OTRS please. Physical possession doesn't give you the copyright, the author needs to agree.

 Comment please leave DR open until Oct. 9th. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per HiW, Oct 11 Alan (talk) 19:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no freedom of panorama in France, yet F (talk) 07:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 19:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is unlikely property of the original uploader on Flick. It's a collage of several photos, one of which is here SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 07:55, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:18, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contradict with Commons:Licensing. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: of course Alan (talk) 19:20, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Koui² as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: screenshot of a copyrighted software Yann (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. Logo can't be own or free. Bilderling (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been reviewed on 17 September 2015 by Josve05a (talk), who found it not public domain but under a license which isn't compatible with Commons. If this image was recently uploaded, it may be speedy deleted. Josve05a (talk) 15:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 19:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Koui² as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot of a copyrighted software Merci d'indiquer la source, et une licence adéquate. Yann (talk) 15:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Koui² as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Screenshot of a copyrighted software Merci d'utiliser la source, et une licence adéquate. Yann (talk) 15:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have a better version of this file and this ine is not being used. Rapsar (talk) 09:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been reviewed on 17 September 2015 by Josve05a (talk), who found it not public domain but under a license which isn't compatible with Commons. If this image was recently uploaded, it may be speedy deleted.

Josve05a (talk) 01:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All licenses are Ok now on flickr, and it seems the images are taken from public exhibitions, thus complying with COM:FOP for Mexico. Materialscientist (talk) 05:59, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paintings / artworks not older than few years, author died in 2011. The paintings might be free in Mexico -- I doubt that, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Leonora Carrington - Self Portrait (2982016369).jpg --, but I cannot tell about that for sure. However, in most countries in the world, the United States included, these paintings are still protected and therefore unfree. To keep them, they must be free in BOTH the United States AND the country of origin which all of them are not. Some of the files have CC templates, but they refer to the photo of the painting only, not to the painting / artwork itself. Furthermore, most of the files had been nominated for deletion earlier (see above) and were decided to be kept by user:Materialscientist. Obviously, he missed the point that these files / photos are unfree in the United States.

Yellowcard (talk) 11:48, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The principle ‘free in the country of origin and the US’ does not apply to the freedom of panorama, see Commons:Freedom of panorama#Choice of law: ‘Since the question of choice of law with regard to freedom of panorama cases is unsettled, current practice on Commons is to retain photos based on the more lenient of the country in which the object is situated and the country in which the photo is taken.’ Therefore only the Mexican FOP rules are relevant for this deletion request. (Otherwise we could neither host images of German statues or memorials.) ireas (talk) 12:03, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't know about that exception, withdrawing my request, then. Yellowcard (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been reviewed on 17 September 2015 by Josve05a (talk), who found it not public domain but under a license which isn't compatible with Commons. If this image was recently uploaded, it may be speedy deleted.

Josve05a (talk) 01:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: All licenses are Ok now on flickr, and it seems the images are taken from public exhibitions, thus complying with COM:FOP for Spain. Materialscientist (talk) 06:07, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These paintings are not in PD. They are transferred from Flickr from an account not related to the author so there is no evidence of any form of permission. The painter died in 1963, so the images can be undeleted in 2034.

Ellywa (talk) 00:19, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 00:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Victoriaedwards (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of portrait head-shots and front views of military men, all claimed "own work" and all obviously not. It is possible that one or two of these is old enough to be retained with proper source information, which own work is not.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some of these are obviously PD, but have been poorly sourced and improperly shown as "Own work". A little work on your part could fix that. Secondarywaltz (talk) 18:42, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment COM:EVID puts the responsibility for proper sourcing and licensing on the uploader, not other users & admins. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
and yet you feel responsible for mass deletions. Contradiction! Secondarywaltz (talk) 07:14, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept old images that likely comply with {{PD-Canada}}, deleted others. Materialscientist (talk) 06:33, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As far as I can read Chinese: No PD source given. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pokéfan95 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uncategorized and unused low quality, no educational purpose

A.Savin 12:03, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am okay for these image to be deleted:
But the remaining:
Should be kept for me. I don't understand why it has no education purpose. I make sure these image will have an education purpose. For example, I uploaded File:Rusted Push button of a Ballpoint pen.jpg because I didn't saw any image showing a ballpen having a rusted push button. In File:Too dark image due to bad focus.jpg, it shows an example of an image that shows a dark image due to the image focus. File:Flexible ruler stretched.jpg and File:Flexible ruler unstretched.jpg shows a flexible ruler (but if someone can merge these two images, I would appreciate it). It shows the ruler both stretched and unstretched. And the nominator said that it is low quality. I would agree to delete my images if there is already a similar image with high quality. And about unused, I haven't yet thinked what article in the English Wikipedia I can put these images. Because it seemed to be hard, and I am thinking that my edit will be reverted there. But I will now be bold, thanks to this nomination. I am thanking the nominator for informing me that my images are unused and uncategorized. :) --Pokéfan95 (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info File:Ink holder of a ballpen.jpg now used in the English Wikipedia article Ballpoint pen. Pokéfan95 (talk) 10:00, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info File:Flexible ruler unstretched.jpg and File:Flexible ruler stretched.jpg now used in the English Wikipedia article Ruler. Pokéfan95 (talk) 10:11, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Info File:Ink holder of a ballpen.jpg now used in the Tagalog Wikipedia article Bolpen. Pokéfan95 (talk) 01:04, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work of such high quality from a drive-by contributor (and by the looks of it, pretty much a single-purpose account) seems a bit unlikely. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:35, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as ineligible, but I think this exceeds threshold of originality. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: very complex Alan (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. Logo. Can't be own or free. Bilderling (talk) 13:54, 17 September 2015 (UTC)I turned to the right holder - use allowed!--Tunyk (talk) 14:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS permission needed Alan (talk) 22:44, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same file has bee usen in here before it was uploaded to Commons. Rapsar (talk) 14:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An OTRS permission has been taken, so it seems there is no reason to delete the file anymore Frock~trwiki (talk) 05:43, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS ok Alan (talk) 22:43, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

There is no evidence that the original photograph is not copyrighted Jarekt (talk) 14:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ANSWER: I believe, somebody did not understand properly the copyright description. There IS NO ORIGINAL PHOTOGRAPH. The photographs here are photographs done by ME(Pborys) to the information boards (in terrain), which are available to the public for no charge. One can easily see that the information board does not state any copyright restrictions in its content. Authors are stated, but no statement of kind "reproduction without a permission is prohibited".

Pborys, You took a photograph of a photograph displayed on information board. The photographer of the original photograph still holds the rights to it unless you can prove he is dead for 70 years. --Jarekt (talk) 15:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jarekt To be honest, it is not the photography, which required work on that board graphics, but the description. Which in fact I could introduce in the panorama shot by myself (also in Commons) with no copyright restrictions. However my panorama looks worse than the "official one". Let me do the following. I'll send a question to the Istebna city hall regarding the copyrights: whether there is any copyright restriction or it is a work in public domain. I know they are very open to promote their region, they give quite valuable printed materials in their tourist information office for free. So it would be a complete nonsense to suppress the widespreading of this panorama. However, before I send such question I would prefer to hear whether this is sufficient or not.

We have a process for copyright holders to gave official permission for distribution. Please read COM:OTRS. --Jarekt (talk) 17:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will send such request but in such case before that I will first improve the quality of the graphics (i.e. remove the date imprints).

I have sent the request for license information (18.09.15 9:55).


Deleted: without permission Alan (talk) 22:36, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Koui² as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: screenshot of a copyrighted software Yann (talk) 14:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Bonjour, je réponds ici, j’espère que c'est la bonne place. je suis désolé si pour vous c'est évident, mais ces images ont été faites par l'auteur du logiciel en question et mis à disposition en Creative commons domaine publique, donc je ne comprends pas trop pourquoi il n'est pas possible de les utiliser ici...?

Le logo Sensomusic a lui aussi été effacé, or d'autres logiciels (ableton live, reaper...) ont leur logo sur leur page. je suis un utilisateur d'Usine Hollyhock et j'aimerai simplement aider à le faire connaitre un peu plus car c'est un logiciel de grande qualité.

merci pour toute explications — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tikitpok (talk • contribs)

Il semble que Olivier Sens soit l'auteur du logiciel.
It seems that Olivier Sens is the software author. Yann (talk) 16:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Doesn't matter since the software still is copyrighted. --Koui² (talk) 21:47, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it matters. The author can choose to release screenshot of his software under a free license, even if the software is not. Yann (talk) 21:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to the user page of Necessary Evil, he is not the stated author of the picture, Knud Bach Madsen from Vanløse, Denmark. Stigfinnare (talk) 14:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Knud Bach Madsen left me an envelope with the photos and permitted me to do what ever I wanted to do with them. --Necessary Evil (talk) 23:02, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Read COM:OTRS and follow the instructions Alan (talk) 22:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small black and white image claimed as own work, and most likely culled from an unsourced source. No metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this small, blurry image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This depicts a 3D object which is not user's own work. A proper source of the object is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO Image depicts hand painted drum. User did not create drum. No metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User is claiming own work on a series of old photos, including this one. No source other than own work for a photo (halftoned) of a gent who died in 1909. Not credible claim, although with proper sourcing image might be old enough to be kept. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. User did not create the 3D object depicted, no metadata, no indication of user's own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, no metadata, small blurry photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:07, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this old halftoned image, probable COM:COPYVIO Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User did not create the 3D pin in the image, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User did not create this 3D pin either, very small, low resolution, no indication of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, not own work, sources of images need to be provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of image in frame, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the age of this photo, it is possible that with correct source it might be able to be retained. However own work it is not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no license. Uploader added {{PD-old-70}} and {{PD-US-not renewed}} later. This image was uploaded to en: under fair use - see en:File:KarlBrenner.jpg. Uploader states Jim Sweeney as the author in contacy to en: where nazi germany unknown state photographer is noted. Jim Sweeney doesn't sound very german an its unlikely that this WW2 image was taken by an "enemy". But if Mr. Sweeney is in fact the author we would nee to know his live dates. Only if he died before 1946 the image is likely in public domain. JuTa 18:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

en:User:Jim Sweeney is an enWP editor (most likely still alive, having edited as recently as this August, albeit semi-retired) whose primary area of activity has been with the Military History project. I very much doubt he was the author, just the uploader as shown at the above link. (Were he actually the photographer, I’d expect the file to have been uploaded as “own work“, and there’d have been no need to bother with a FUR.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I receveived the following message by the uploader: Hi, Jim Sweeney is not the photographer, this is an error on my part ; he is the precedent Wikipedia user who had uploaded the picture on Commons. According to a french book that talk about the Waffen-SS (named "Les Secrets du Troisième Reich"), the photographer of this picture was a sergent under the command of the Gruppenführer Karl-Heinrich Brenner, named Kazynski. He took the photo during the month of december 1944, when Brenner received the Knight Cross, on the Eastern Front. Kazynski, the photographer, died in march 1945, in the Battle of Bautzen. I don't know if it will be enough, but I hope you will consider my request. Regards VaultIndustries (talk) 23:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC) This might be helpfull to decide this DR. --JuTa 06:28, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Alan (talk) 22:39, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's been replaced by a better one Garrapata (talk) 18:59, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused Alan (talk) 22:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author did not consent to usage Li shook (talk) 20:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 21:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject is an original creation coverded by copyright. There is no freedom of panorama in France.
La projection sur le bâtiment est un travail protégé par le droit d'auteur. Il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en France. Trizek from FR 21:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you categorize the file correctly? This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 22:11, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:38, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At first, the photo is derivative work of probably copyrighted painting. At second, this is small photo without metadata, own work is dubious. Taivo (talk) 22:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:37, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's the wrong one that was supposed to be uploaded. I have my own one,however,that I was supposed to upload. I did not get permission from this one,but again,I have my own version. So,please,delete this file. Thank you. A Wikipedian on Wikipedia (talk) 00:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's also a PDF. --A Wikipedian on Wikipedia (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:51, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrightable poster. Josve05a (talk) 01:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Alan (talk) 22:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NOAO images are non-free: http://www.noao.edu/image_gallery/copyright.html "These electronically available materials are considered intellectual property and are intended for use for educational, academic, and research purposes and are not intended for commercial use." 189.25.205.2 01:16, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eh? This image uses only Hubble space telescope (hst) image, obtained with the advanced camera fur surveys (acs), no noao. BR, --Fabian RRRR (talk) 22:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This picture doesn't come from NOAO site, only its description. See here. Pikador (talk) 11:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: from Hubble Alan (talk) 22:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Viola los derechos de autor C. Jonel [talk] 01:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP Alan (talk) 22:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As indicated on the page for the other photo, Ashley C. Williams indeed has a Wikipedia article.
Also, why is the user being given warnings for copyright violations? She says she took the photos herself. Nightscream (talk) 12:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per nom Alan (talk) 22:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Resolution of the file is too small, there are no EXIF information. Huge suspicion of copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Resolution of the file is too small, there are no EXIF information. Huge suspicion of copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 08:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by SVG +mt 09:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 22:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture collection must collect from local picture from Commons, please upload first every picture to Commons and then collect it from those. Please take a look at File:Collage Rome.jpg as an example how to do it. See Commons:Collages for details. Motopark (talk) 05:38, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 19:33, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

They are by definition a notable person as we have an article on them. Their position is that this is a newer photo than the one in the article, and should replace the existing one, which is almost five years old now. GreenReaper (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomination withdrawn. Thanks to GreenReaper for pointing that out. I wasn't aware that a Wikipedia article on the person existed, but the image does appear to be a valid upload. --DAJF (talk) 23:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Also, why is the user being given warnings for copyright violations? She says she took the photos herself. Nightscream (talk) 12:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that was due to File:Ashley C Williams.jpg, which was apparently one or two photos not taken by herself. GreenReaper (talk) 18:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use on enwiki and kowiki Alan (talk) 19:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same photo has been used in here before. An OTRS permission is needed to proove that the uploader is the original creator of the file. Rapsar (talk) 08:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 19:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as "own work" but Peter Barwell is in the photo, seems unlikely he used a delayed-action shutter in those togs rather than having a photog on hand. Pinkbeast (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked as "own work" but Peter Barwell is in the photo, seems unlikely he used a delayed-action shutter in those togs rather than having a photog on hand. Pinkbeast (talk) 10:30, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 19:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is very old Bharath.jella (talk) 18:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Herbythyme Alan (talk) 19:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted, Not public domain Diego Weissel Rovira (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]