Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Shortcuts
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

change
Shortcut

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

change
Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
    • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
    • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
    • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
    • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
    • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
    {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

change
See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

change

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

change
See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
  • Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

change

Vinod Sharma

change
Vinod Sharma (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article with mainly interview (primary sources) left after some pruning, not enough to show that WP:NBIO is met. Ravensfire (talk) 16:51, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 16:51, 2 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


DSP for secure communication in blockchain

change
DSP for secure communication in blockchain (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Likely AI generated; article has several issues:

  • It is little fleshed out; the information in the article is likely correct, but the different pieces of information aren't properly connected.
  • The article mixes two sets of technologies that are completely unrelated (digital signal processing and blockchain)
  • Blockchain may be a buzzword.

So if I use digiral signal processing to process a signal, I can also decrypt the signal before processing and encrypt it afterwards, I do not need specific blockchain technology. In short: I propose we delete this one, without replacement. Comments? Eptalon (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 21:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Wikipedia:Bad articles

change
Wikipedia:Bad articles (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Useless page in Wikipedia namespace. It also said it was a policy but it's not, so I removed that claim. Depextual (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

Delete adds nothing useful. Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 16:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Farsad (rapper)

change
Farsad (rapper) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have checked in detail could not find any Notability for the subject other Please check If I am wrong Ksy 08:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep Farsad is one of the notable Persian rapper, as in Iran news don't cover the rappers because hipHop is illegal and Iranian sources are under control of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps
But some super notable sources coverd Farsad which I added for him *Timsar* (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No offence, Lets other Editors decide, as I have already mentioned Please Check If I am Wrong. Wikipedia follow rules and regulation.
And according to wiki rules you can improve the article but your Vote don't Count. Ksy 09:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We don't have any rules that article maker can't vote in Wiki! I did it a lot on farsi wiki and English wiki, Thanks for the corporation *Timsar* (talk) 09:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  Administrator note: @Kuskrey: If you're going to tell another user that they can't !vote, you need to cite the rule that says so. I believe that the article creator is allowed to !vote. Did you have some other reason in mind? -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
ok, if you say so, it is added in my knowledge. Ksy 10:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 08:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ramkripalyadavg

change
Ramkripalyadavg (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only a few references in the article are independent, not very notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 18:30, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:30, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


City of federal subject significance

change
City of federal subject significance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI-Generated content, How users like this Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:28, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kherai Puja

change
Kherai Puja (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article doesn't have any sources and Unreferenced. How Users Created Their New Articles Like this without references. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 11:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 11:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Salman Malik

change
Salman Malik (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DIVINE has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It appears that the individual does not meet the WP:GNG criteria for notability. They have completed one comedy tour, which is mentioned in Arab News, but this alone is not enough to establish notability. DIVINE (talk) 09:13, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 09:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance

change
Carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI/LLM Generated Article, How users created their new articles like this. Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 03:46, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 03:46, 29 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Koreapas

change
Koreapas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable homepage to a uni, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:56, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Alliebrack National School

change
Alliebrack National School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010Talk 22:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


African–American Indigenous solidarity

change
African–American Indigenous solidarity (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fr33kman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nonsense term that doesn't exist. Not QD-able fr33kman 22:22, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • I considered several synonyms and neighbor–synonyms before creating it,
but I prefered this option. The most common is Black–Indigenous intersectionality but that violates and so should be Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA). I don't like it but perhaps we should ignore my aesthetic preferences and use Black–Indigenous intersectionality (USA). Invasive Spices (talk) 22:05, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 22:22, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Amteka

change
Amteka (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable village, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:18, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:18, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of Garja gods

change
List of Garja gods (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable subject, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:14, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Bad (Bodo culture)

change
Bad (Bodo culture) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable culture, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails DICDEF and GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:10, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep: In addition to the cited source, I also found this described in a book online by B.C. Basumatary. There may also be other sources which can't be found online. As an anthropological topic, which is likely the subject of research, I believe we should allow an article about this. (Unless the article seemed to plagiarism or POV-pushing, which this doesn't seem to be.) Oholiba (talk) 20:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The cited source just gives definitions, it doesn't demonstrate any notability. There may be sources offline however on the other hand there may be none at all..., "likely the subject of research" - says who?,
    Without being disrespectful your !vote is pretty much clutching at straws. You've not offered any substantial or indepth sources that demonstrate any notability, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    "Demonstrating notability" is an indeterminate concept here. It makes sense for a person, movie, or company, but what does it mean to say that a cultural belief demonstrates notability. It's covered in sources, which is enough for Wikipedia. WP:GNG Oholiba (talk) 22:00, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Well I mean being important enough to have an article by having coverage in a number of independent reliable sources, One source doesn't make this pass GNG unfortunately, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 22:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


This request is due to close on 18:10, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Hapsa Hatarnai

change
Hapsa Hatarnai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable ceremony, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:08, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Keep It's found in many search results in Google Books. It's a notable topic, and probably has been studied by researchers. Oholiba (talk) 20:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    This tells you a snippet of what it is, this and this appear to be copypastes from somewhere (or it's a huge coincidence they've included this and other ceremonies in the exact same order), this is fine, The rest of the books don't appear to even mention Hapsa Hatarnai. I'm still not seeing any evidence of any notability here, The books I've mentioned just confirms it exists but there's nothing indepth or substantial, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 18:08, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Practical High School

change
Practical High School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG –Davey2010Talk 17:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma Academy

change
Gurudev Kalicharan Brahma Academy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:41, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:41, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Multirate signal processing

change
Multirate signal processing (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced, LLM-generated article. Ternera (talk) 17:32, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


TXEX Exchange

change
TXEX Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Two references have nothing to do with the subject and TrustPilot suggests it's a scam website: https://www.trustpilot.com/review/txex.pro Ternera (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 15:15, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Mohammad Zaid Khan

change
Mohammad Zaid Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Full of paid/sponsored articles used as sources, highly questionable "award" (youngest entrepreneur of Uttarakhand at age 22? I highly doubt that). Even the one source left after my trimming is more of a blog post from a company than a good source. Nothing here to show WP:NBIO is met. Ravensfire (talk) 13:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:55, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Pixel 9

change
Pixel 9 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreferenced Mobile Phone Article, Underdeveloped Article Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 13:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ghostfuckers

change
Ghostfuckers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable as a standalone episode. We don't have a List of Helluva Boss episodes that this article can redirect to. I don't really see the point of redirecting this article to Helluva Boss. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 11:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 11:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


SYLBEATZ

change
SYLBEATZ (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No significant coverage, doesn’t pass WP:GNG, Page creator blocked in enwiki for sock. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 10:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 10:28, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Anti-aliasing filter

change
Anti-aliasing filter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:NOT. Essay and AI generated. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:53, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete It is looking like an AI content, also it is a WP:NOT, it should delete. - Centella Gold • (Talk) 21 November 2024
  •   Delete content appears to be LLM-generated spam. Ternera (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I replaced it with a three-sentence stub, lkely keepable now. I have to say though that the problem of this was not that it was likely generated by an LLM, but that it was just a sketch. The generated content was accurate. On a side note: we didn't have a page on aliasing, so I created that as well.--Eptalon (talk) 04:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 08:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Edward Harte

change
Edward Harte (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. No reliable sources in the article and overall reads very promotional of the subject (take Edward worked hard on improving his sightreading. As a result, Edward's sightreading is surprisingly sharp as an example). No reliable and significant sources elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 02:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 02:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Oceanic International Yoga School Goa (2nd nomination)

change
Oceanic International Yoga School Goa (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Sources in the article are all SELFPUBLISHED, Fails NCORP and GNG, (Just noting NSCHOOL would be irrelevant as it's a yoga place not a high school)

Article was previously deleted per G11 and it was also A4'd at Yoga International School Goa, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nom in previous RFD withdrew and I had closed it without looking at the article. –Davey2010Talk 15:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 15:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Category:Thomas and Friends movies

change
Category:Thomas and Friends movies (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only one article. content should be moved to Category:Thomas and Friends QuantumFoam66 (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 23:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Ryan T. White

change
Ryan T. White (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. BRP ever 20:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Raja Usmani

change
Raja Usmani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. BRP ever 20:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:26, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Abdulwahab Office

change
Abdulwahab Office (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Promotional. BRP ever 20:25, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Manigandan Manjunathan

change
Manigandan Manjunathan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There are Guinness World Record for almost everything these days. This alone can not make the page notable. BRP ever 20:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Deer Jade

change
Deer Jade (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Not notable. BRP ever 20:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 20:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Amit Chakraborty

change
Amit Chakraborty (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, I believe the sources that are on a Amit Chakraborty is a completely different person, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kislay Panday

change
Kislay Panday (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The source look unreliable and quite promotional. The article on times of India looks like it's there for his promotion and nothing else. Fails notability criteria. BRP ever 19:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete This was pretty obviously created as a promotional article by a paid editor. Highly promotional in tone, full of paid/sponsored articles, unsourced/fake awards and a lot of unsupported content. From the sources, there's a few less than complimentary things that could be added to the article. I've removed the obviously bad sources but question some of the rest. The overall tone of this is just terrible. I don't think this is worth saving, the notability is questionable. Combine everything and I'm in favor of deleting. Ravensfire (talk) 04:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chirag Bhandari

change
Chirag Bhandari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:58, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Apt Pay

change
Apt Pay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable company, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NCORP and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sahil Luthra

change
Sahil Luthra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:56, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Abdul Wahab Al Maimani

change
Abdul Wahab Al Maimani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable person, Found [1] and [2] and that's it, No evidence of any notability, Fials NPERSON and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 19:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


R. Edward Grant

change
R. Edward Grant (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article with no valid sources that would meet WP:NBIO. I see four sources in this article and at least two of them don't even mention this person. Depextual (talk) 17:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:03, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Harrison Gwinnett

change
Harrison Gwinnett (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article. No reliable sources that would meet WP:NBIO. In fact, all the sources are either promotional, or don't mention the subject at all. Depextual (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 16:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Role of Fourier transform in quantum mechanics

change
Role of Fourier transform in quantum mechanics (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not simple, not encyclopedic, reads like it was generated using an LLM. I'm not sure where to begin merging this with an existing article. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 12:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Chirag Gajera

change
Chirag Gajera (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The nominator's reason for doing this is: I do not see this person's name in any of the sources. Non-notable person and promotional article. Depextual (talk) 19:54, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:54, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


change
Vedic Legal (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article, but QD was declined. All of these references are either some kind of press release or otherwise promotional, so they don't qualify for WP:NORG. Depextual (talk) 19:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 19:18, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Parvez Sultan Rupani

change
Parvez Sultan Rupani (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Promotional article, QD was declined. The sources are all promotional, and I don't believe they qualify for notability according to WP:NBIO. Depextual (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Keep The article on Parvez Sultan Rupani is supported by significant coverage from independent sources, as evidenced by the references provided. Additionally, the content does not contain any promotional language, ensuring a neutral and factual representation of his achievements and career.--Symonds Gerother (talk) 19:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


NBC November 24, 2003 Program Lineup

change
NBC November 24, 2003 Program Lineup (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Like a directory, not relevant for Wikipedia. Depextual (talk) 18:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 18:27, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


STARZ! NOVEMBER 04, 2000 LINEUP

change
STARZ! NOVEMBER 04, 2000 LINEUP (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Another one of these TV listing type pages, not encyclopedic and cant be turned into anything of encyclopedic value - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:08, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 10:08, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Grant Palmer

change
Grant Palmer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Absolutiva has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable actor it fails WP:GNG. Absolutiva (talk) 08:59, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 08:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Oludotun Akinbobola

change
Oludotun Akinbobola (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Lee Vilenski has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable businessman. Fails WP:GNG Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:47, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 12:47, 24 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Anglican Adam Preaching Society

change
Anglican Adam Preaching Society (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-independent sources. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 02:55, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 02:55, 24 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Alone (Marshmello song)

change
Alone (Marshmello song) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Un-encyclopedic tone, non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 23:45, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 23:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Paolo Petrocelli

change
Paolo Petrocelli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ethn23 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It's probably a spam interwiki. Deleted also on itwiki and enwiki. This page is exactly the page that was cancelled on enwiki. Read also, if you want, this RdF of itwiki. Ethn23 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  • Keep. No valid reason to remove the article. The article includes numerous cited sources that adhere to Simple Wiki's guidelines:
WP:GNG, if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be notable
WP:PEOPLE, a person can be notable if they have been written about in many published secondary sources. These must be reliable, independent of each other, and independent of the subject. 46.36.115.202 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Further comment. Just because it was removed from another wiki, cross-wiki doesn't mean it should be removed here, especially when these are two different articles (with different text and used sources). See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. 46.36.115.202 (talk) 18:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:53, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives

change
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Archives (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Hi, we currently have Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives and this template. This one is a bit hard to maintain, while the other one is much easier. I think we can simply use Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/archives on the archive page for navigation. If deleted, I think it will be best if we move the the other list of archive to this title. BRP ever 14:11, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Keep because everything links to it[3] but even if nothing linked to it I'd still go with keep as it was created in 21 January 2008 so imho should be marked as historical, Imho mot really causing any harm existing and it's not hosting TB of data so yeah keep, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Davey2010 Would it be alright if I swap the titles? Most archives now go as it's subpages and returning to a set of old archives makes it confusing. I will be replacing/adjusting the template on the old pages wherever suitable. The other template automatically adds the new archive to the list after update. BRP ever 03:29, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi @BRPever, Of course, I have no objections to that :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 12:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kamaria

change
Kamaria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I wanted to improve this article but there are barely any reliable source with information that can fix or grow this page. I'd say this needs to be redirected to Yadav due to clear lack of general information. The content not written with NPOV. BRP ever 15:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 15:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:1925-26 NHL season by team

change
Template:1925-26 NHL season by team (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating a group of navigation templates that each have either zero or only one relevant blue link. With so few relevant links, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between pages.

Templates included in this request:

Notes to closing admin:

  • None of these templates appear to have any subpages.
  • All of these templates are transcluded on at least one page.

-- Auntof6 (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change
  •   Delete per nom Yelromcc (talk) 16:41, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete the NHL and NCAA ones but Keep the NFL ones as there are 5 blue links on all of them. Remember the headers are valid navigation targets also in a navbox. That being said I feel like we have had discussions in the past that said as long as we have one bluelink in a navbox they are good to go. I can't be bothered to go look for it though thus this comment. -Djsasso (talk) 03:23, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The purpose of the NFL templates is to navigate between pages related to different teams. The other blue links are not helpful for that. That's why I said relevant blue links. Blue links in a navbox's headers are often not helpful for its main purpose. -- Auntof6 (talk) 07:44, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 05:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

change
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  Quickly deleted by Fr33kman as G5. Depextual (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Samuels

change
Joseph Samuels (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable musician. The claims in this article are unverifiable. This has been the subject of spam on English Wikipedia. Depextual (talk) 22:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 22:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. No consensus to delete. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sigma male

change
Sigma male (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 13:43, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:15, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ozhan Akcakaya

change
Ozhan Akcakaya (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Promotional in tone. Awards are not mentioned in the sources and given by sources whose reliability is questionable. No significant, reliable coverage elsewhere. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 14:01, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 14:01, 23 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Feldman

change
Jay Feldman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fehufanga has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Sources are not independent (as clearly written at the end of source 5: This article was written in cooperation with Dr. Jay Feldman), otherwise I found no significant coverage of this subject. Awards don't really make a case for notability either. — *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:52, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 13:52, 23 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. per discussion below, Article moved to Soap on a rope –Davey2010Talk 19:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Soap on a Rope

change
Soap on a Rope (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Symonds Gerother has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Encyclopedic content on Wikipedia is expected to have a neutral and formal tone. Terms like "absolute knee-slapper" and references to sensitive topics such as "Prison rape" used for humor are inappropriate and do not align with Wikipedia’s guidelines on tone and sensitivity. Such language could make the article feel biased or trivializing rather than factual. Symonds Gerother (talk) 06:26, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 06:26, 21 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to   Keep. /Withdrawn as per discussion below –Davey2010Talk 14:42, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Burn Hall Srinagar

change
Burn Hall Srinagar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, cannot find any evidence of any notability, As far as I can see en:Burn Hall School is a completely different school as that article doesn't mention Baramula. Fails NSCHOOL and GNG. –Davey2010Talk 17:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If both schools are the same then I'll withdraw but I don't think they are ? –Davey2010Talk 17:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think they are both the same school. Perhaps it should be moved to the enwiki name and expanded. fr33kman 10:39, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Fr33kman, I think so too tbh, I was comparing both articles and the Simple one omitted things the Enwiki had but both articles mention the sister schools in Abbottabad so I'm now slightly more confident this is the same school,
I just didn't want to move these in case this was another school so thanks for your reply and confirming it's not :), Many thanks, Warmest Regards, –Davey2010Talk 14:40, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

change

This request is due to close on 17:45, 28 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.



change
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion&oldid=9904952"