Jump to content

Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/BOZ

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Contributor copyright investigation

This CCI cleanup subpage has been opened because concerns of multiple point infringement have been substantiated and further steps are necessary to address the serious risk of copyright violation from the listed contributor. Listings are not intended to imply a presumption of bad faith on the part of any contributor, as copyright laws vary widely around the world and many contributors who violate Wikipedia's copyrights policy do so inadvertently through not understanding it or the United States' laws that govern it.

If you are here because of a note on an article's talk page explaining removal of text, please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline.

Instructions

[edit]

All contributors with no history of copyright problems are welcome to contribute to clean up. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors with a history of copyright problems and so are not welcome to directly evaluate their own or others' copyright violations in CCIs. They are welcome to assist with rewriting any problems identified.

If contributors have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation, it may be assumed without further evidence that all of their major contributions are copyright violations, and they may be removed indiscriminately in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations. Contributors who are the subject of a contributor copyright investigation are among contributors who have been shown to have a history of extensive copyright violation and so all of the below listed contributions may be removed indiscriminately. However, to avoid collateral damage, efforts should be made when possible to verify infringement before removal.

When every section is completed, please alter the listing for this CCI at Template:CCIlist to include the tag "completed=yes". This will alert a clerk that the listing needs to be archived.

  • {{CCI-open|Contributor name|Day Month Year|completed=yes}}

Text

[edit]
  • Examine the article or the diffs linked below.
  • If the contributor has added creative content, either evaluate it carefully for copyright concerns or remove it.
  • Evaluating for copyright concerns may include checking the listed sources, spot-checking using google, google books and other search engines and looking for major differences in writing style. The background may give some indication of the kinds of copyright concerns that have been previously detected. For older text, mirrors of Wikipedia content may make determining which came first difficult. It may be helpful to look for significant changes to the text after it was entered. Searching for the earlier form of text can help eliminate later mirrors. If you cannot determine which came first, text should be removed presumptively, since there is an established history of copying with the editor in question.
  • If you remove text presumptively, place {{subst:CCI|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page.
  • If you specifically locate infringement and remove it (or revert to a previous clean version), place {{subst:cclean}} on the article's talk page. The url parameter may be optionally used to indicate source.
  • If there is insufficient creative content on the page for it to survive the removal of the text or it is impossible to extricate from subsequent improvements, replace it with {{subst:copyvio}}, linking to the investigation subpage in the url parameter. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor. Your note on the CCI investigation page serves that purpose.
  • To tag an article created by the contributor for presumptive deletion, place {{subst:copyvio|url=see talk}} on the article's face and {{subst:CCId|name=Contributor name}} on the article's talk page. List the article as instructed at the copyright problems board, but you do not need to notify the contributor.
  • After examining an article:
  • replace the diffs after the colon on the listing with indication of whether a problem was found (add {{y}}) or not (add {{n}}). If the article is blanked and may be deleted, please indicate as much after the {{y}}. The {{?}} template may be used for articles where you were unable to determine whether or not a violation occurred, but are prepared to remove the article from consideration – either because the material is no longer present in the article, or it is adequately paraphrased so as to no longer be a violation (please specify which).
  • Follow with your username and the time to indicate to others that the article has been evaluated and appropriately addressed. This is automatically generated by four tildes (~~~~)
  • If a section is complete, consider collapsing it by placing {{collapse top}} and {{collapse bottom}} beneath the section header and after the final listing.

Background

[edit]

BOZ

[edit]
  • BOZ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
  • Check requested by Fram (talk)
  • In March 2020, I noticed that BOZ had added many short copyright violations in articles in 2019: see User_talk:BOZ/Archive 2020#Short copyright violations in plot summaries. BOZ then went through some articles and removed some copyvios. Now, during an AfD, another editor found another, older copyright violation, see User talk:BOZ#Copyright problem: Mike Tinney. This got me worried, so I checked some other older articles.
  • Jeff Tidball has e.g.
    • "[...]by January 2004 the Last Unicorn Games RPG division of Decipher Games consisted of just Tidball and Jess Heinig, so Decipher shut down its RPG division and laid off the remaining staff."
  • The source[1]
    • "By January 2004, the Last Unicorn Games RPG division of Decipher Games consisted of just Jeff Tidball and Jess Heinig, two designers hired in the interim. Decipher then decided to shut down its RPG division and lay off the remaining staff. "
  • Philip Reed (game designer)
    • "In September 2002, Reed created a little hobby business, first releasing Mime Smashing (2002) - a card game that had been intended for publication by Hobgoblynn Press before the deal fell through - then the PDF that his company would be built on: 101 Spellbooks (2002), a collection of fictional books for use with the d20 system."
  • Source[2]
    • "That September, Reed decided to create a little hobby business, first releasing Mime Smashing (2002) — a card game that had been intended for publication by Hobgoblynn Press before the deal fell through. Then he published the PDF that his company would be built on: 101 Spellbooks (2002). 101 Spellbooks was a collection of books (and the spells, feats, skills, magic items, and poisons they contained) for use with the d20 system. "
  • Eric J. Gibson
    • "in 2008, Gibson announced that he was cancelling Septimus, that he could not refund preorders, that he could not afford to ship books to people who wanted to take product instead of a refund, that none of his D6 lines had ever made money, that he had lost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and that he was would be dissolving West End Games."
  • Source
    • "In 2008, Gibson announced that he was cancelling Septimus, that he couldn’t refund preorders, that he couldn’t afford to ship books to people who wanted to take product instead of a refund, that none of his D6 lines had ever made money, that he’d lost hundreds of thousands of dollars, and (finally) that he was done with West End Games and would be dissolving the company."

Note how in this last example you have the typical telltale of someone trying to avoid a copyvio getting detected by doing the most minimal of changes, and end up creating grammatically incorrect sentences which still are copyvios anyway. These are just some examples (and not the only ones in these very articles even), all from the same week; presumably, as these are from 2014 and many other copyvio's were from years later, this has happened in countless other articles and edits. Fram (talk) 09:25, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that this situation is serious, so I will take responsibility and will cooperate and participate to find and correct any problematic additions on my part. I understand that an investigation like this can take a considerable amount of time, so starting with the examples here I will proactively go through my contributions as time permits and begin rewriting them to remove any actual or potential plagiarism, as well as any other incidents that are found throughout the course of this investigation. BOZ (talk) 14:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I looked a bit through some recent edits. Escape from the Hidden Castle, created a little more than a month ago, had the sentence Escape from the Hidden Castle is a game in which two to eight players take charge of some guests in a haunted house.- compare that to the source, which says Midnight Party is a game for two to eight players, each of whom take charge of some guests in a haunted house... No, they don't say the same thing, but there is clear close paraphrasing- some words are removed the structure of the sentence is changed a bit, but they are the same.

Twilightcycle: 2000- Shannon Appelcline explained that three time travel adventures were published after the Computer was destroyed with the publication of Crash Course Manual: Alice through the Mirrorshades (1989), Twilightcycle: 2000 (1990), and Vulture Warriors of Dimension X (1990). The goal of these adventures was for the player characters to restore the Computer... compare to the source: A trilogy of time travel adventures followed: Alice through the Mirrorshades (1989), Twilightcycle: 2000 (1990), and Vulture Warriors of Dimension X (1990). Characters set out to restore the computer... more close paraphrasing...

Breakaway Rider- compare Breakaway Rider is a game in which each player receives six cards, and the object for the cyclists is to keep up with the yellow jersey rider – the player who has played the highest card in the round to The gist of it is: each player receives six cards. The object is to keep up with the ‘yellow jersey’ rider (the player who has played the highest card in the round)

This will need to be accepted and is going to be a difficult case, I will be opening it after I write this. It is late where I live right now, I will figure out what further to do tomorrow morning. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide 05:20, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution survey

[edit]

Subpages

[edit]

Pages 1 to 20

[edit]
Article still exists it's just currently in draftspace. Wizardman

Pages 21 to 40

[edit]

Pages 41 to 60

[edit]

Pages 61 to 80

[edit]

Pages 81 to 100

[edit]

Pages 101 to 120

[edit]

Pages 121 to 140

[edit]

Pages 141 to 160

[edit]

Pages 161 to 180

[edit]

Pages 181 to 200

[edit]

Pages 201 to 220

[edit]

Pages 221 to 240

[edit]

Pages 241 to 260

[edit]

Pages 261 to 280

[edit]

Pages 281 to 300

[edit]

Pages 301 to 320

[edit]

Pages 321 to 340

[edit]

Pages 341 to 360

[edit]

Pages 361 to 380

[edit]

Pages 381 to 400

[edit]

Pages 401 to 420

[edit]

Pages 421 to 440

[edit]

Pages 441 to 460

[edit]

Pages 461 to 480

[edit]

Pages 481 to 500

[edit]

Pages 501 to 520

[edit]

Pages 521 to 540

[edit]

Pages 541 to 560

[edit]

Pages 561 to 580

[edit]

Pages 581 to 600

[edit]

Pages 601 to 620

[edit]

Pages 621 to 640

[edit]

Pages 641 to 660

[edit]

Pages 661 to 680

[edit]

Pages 681 to 700

[edit]

Pages 701 to 720

[edit]

Pages 721 to 740

[edit]

Pages 741 to 760

[edit]

Pages 761 to 780

[edit]

Pages 781 to 800

[edit]

Pages 801 to 820

[edit]

Pages 821 to 840

[edit]

Pages 841 to 860

[edit]

Pages 861 to 880

[edit]

Pages 881 to 900

[edit]

Pages 901 to 920

[edit]

Pages 921 to 940

[edit]

Pages 941 to 960

[edit]

Pages 961 to 980

[edit]

Pages 981 to 1000

[edit]

This report generated by ContributionSurveyor.java at 2022-02-01T18:13:09.8955625Z.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Contributor_copyright_investigations/BOZ&oldid=1245911652"