User talk:Sakura Cartelet/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Sakura Cartelet. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Hey, I just went ahead and reverted this. I was wondering if you wanted your userpage semi-protected to prevent that happening in the future? Tiptoety ^talk 23:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

No problemo, let me know if you change your mind. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 23:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

As I said, the policies state that species should be included only in the genus articles. It did say "genus", but it actually is a species; Athene cretensis. The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! (talk) 00:38, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi - in an attempt to get some form of resolution on the Alien stubs SFD, I've made a new proposal at Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2008/February/25#.7B.7BAlien-stub.7D.7D_.2F_Cat:Alien_stubs which you might be interested in looking at. Grutness...wha? 09:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

I forgot to log in, and I did not get prompted to add an edit summary. It should properly be removed for WP:NOT compliance, which I;ve already done. 129.108.25.4 (talk) 19:29, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Thats okay, I din;t have any particular queries at the moment - what sort of general advice would you have? --Stuartjmanton (talk) 17:34, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi! maxsch created an RFC for myself User:Florentino floro - Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Florentino floro[1] I would appreciate it if you would take a look. Max created this upon message to my adopting parent User:Diligent Terrier here[2] vis-a-vis the pending User:Diligent Terrier/Florentino floro and Maxschmelling (created on 18:38, 18 May 2008 by Diligent Terrier) Thanks.--Florentino floro (talk) 05:56, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

You prodded an article, Alex Sallons, on the grounds that it was a copy and paste of Martin Luther King with few modifications. Articles like that are eligible for speedy deletion under criterion G3 (vandalism) as blatant misinformation, therefore a prod is not required. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 00:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

hi, its me ,20bite. i just want to say hi. hehe.kk contact me please! --20bite (talk) 04:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)20bite hi, if your reading this, this is 20bite here i want to know how to merge articles, please contact me. ty —Preceding unsigned comment added by 20bite (talk • contribs) 17:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

[3] is a website and team that has actual sponsors including iKobo, Manpower and Milltech and have a deal with Adidas a team who has their own footballs, with a well known six-a-side football league on Tuesday's and Thursday's with Cups and leagues, a website with 27,000 hits! A u18 team. They play teams like Shildon A.F.C Rutherford A.F.C. They have money to spend, and have many links with well-known companies, they wil be touring Malta in November with details on the site about it. They are a FA Charter afficiated club. A club hosted by a well known hosting service, Red Fox Hosting. A club that could be playing in the Football League in less then 10 years! Also a team that had played in the Tyne & Wear Football League, until the fall of the league. A Archive section going back to 1999! Rivalries as well! Hopefully this piece of text is not regarded as vandalism but regarded as good point to create the article 'Sassco'. Feel free to post on the message board on the Sassco website or on my user talk page, Thanks!!!--FederationKOSOVO (talk) 19:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I've rewritten Non-heterosexuals and would appreciate you revisiting Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Non-heterosexuals to see if your concerns have been addressed. Thank you! Banjeboi 13:32, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

I second Benjiboi's request, and believe your concerns have been addressed. In all fairness, the article clearly didn't assert notability as it was when nominated. However, due to the improvements during the AfD, please consider withdrawing the nomination, per WP:HEY, as well as per WP:AFD which says: If the reasons given in the deletion nomination are later addressed by editing, the nomination should be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an admin. Thank you. — Becksguy (talk) 06:24, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Please help me keep an eye out [4]. I am away from Wikipedia about 21 hours a day. Drop me a message if I need to look into anything, or go to WP:AN. Thanks for bringing the COI to our attention. Keegan^talk 05:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Take a look at the instructions. Let me know if there are other reasons and perhaps they can be included. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

I wanted to vandalize your user boxes to make one of them say "this user is a sex offender" but don't know how. User name one (talk) 05:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I don't really know much about adding stuff to wikipedia, I tried to add the article http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Submissions/List_of_UK_Hardcore_producers&action=history

The source is discogs which is a fairly reputable site —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.104.227.11 (talk) 20:33, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the edit to my user page. Please be advised that I have received death threats from this user in the past and the most recent edit summary accuses me of murder, so calling it vandalism is misleading/inappropriate/not enough. If you notice any other such "contributions", please revert ASAP, notify oversight immediately and report such abuse to WP:ANI so the user can be blocked as soon as possible to prevent other such problems. — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:00, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi! Just wanted to clarify something for you when reviewing suspected copyright violations. Your edit here said the two pages were unrelated - what happened is one article was "cut-and-pasted" to another location instead of moved using the "Move" tab. That is usually what has happened when Corenbot says that one Wikipedia article is a copy of another. You can check this in the articles' histories and fix it by either:

• Replacing the content of the new article with a redirect to the old article, and reverting the history of the old article back to before it was cut-and-pasted - this is appropriate if you can't see why it was moved or it was no longer necessary (e.g. to create a disambiguation page for an article that has since been deleted), or
• Tagging the new article with {{db-histmerge|NAME OF PAGE THE ARTICLE WAS CUT FROM}} if the cut-and-paste move makes sense (e.g. fixing a typo) and the page should be moved to the new location properly. An admin will move the existing article to the new location and merge article histories if necessary.

If you come across a real cut-and-paste mess (e.g. a user has cut-and-pasted several articles on top of one another and they've since been edited), you can explain what's happened at the cut and paste move repair holding pen and an admin will fix it. Hope that helps. :) Somno (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Thought I would include an example of the first way of fixing cut-and-paste moves, since it was difficult to explain and may have been confusing - a user cut-and-pasted Bigger Than Life into Bigger Than Life (film) and Corenbot posted at suspected copyright violations that "Bigger Than Life (film)" was a copy of "Bigger Than Life". I made Bigger Than Life (film) into a redirect to the original article and reverted the original article back. Somno (talk) 05:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Please don't waste my time.... let others who are involved in my arguments deal with this... find some other occupation... peace! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.249.224.61 (talk) 00:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I have posted to User talk:Iiidddeeefffeeerrr. You should not have given a warning, let alone a final warning, for [5]. I know you cannot see the user page now that it has been deleted, but you could when you gave the warning. PrimeHunter (talk) 14:13, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I9 applies to such images (though it might be a good idea to request fair use rationales over deletion in some cases). Have you considered informing the uploader that making a screenshot does not transfer the copyright and that PD-self can only be applied to material they have created from scratch themselves or for material that is a derivative of PD material? Most people are just plainly oblivious to copyright rules. Unless we inform them, it won't improve. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

I know this will be a pain but can you review the Menudo (band) page edits that have been done by me over the past months. I sourced the information from NY post and linked one story from a actual news story the clip was on a blog but I was not using the blog info just the news clip. There have been several obvious fans vandal the page, I also think the user from today that started the drama is a Menudo fan.

Just review for nuetral review and revert sourced info if you feel I am correct and/or re-write it in wiki standards.

Thanks so much for your help.--66.229.250.178 (talk) 19:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

I have created this Image myself and have said so in the comments; therefore it doesn't have a license I don't wish to argue with you or the rules of this site its just I looked at the license options when I uploaded the file and I am not sure which of these options I should have chosen, I would appreciate it if you could help me out with this matter by pointing me in the right direction with this issue.--^AzXeus 18:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I appreciate that I have now resolved the issue Thanks to your help I have added a license to the image and I now know what to do if I want to upload similar images in the future, thank you one last time and I hope wont need you help again ;) --^AzXeus 19:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I already added in all images used in Microsoft Office 2000 wanted rationales. I too made them all as your first one.㍐ (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

This is getting annoying. How am I supposed to contact the OTRS to get a copyright-exclusion, exactly? ResMar 22:52, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Yo, I'm looking at all these tags you're placing on images and a majority of them are basic stuff like screenshots and game covers. Instead of slapping them with a CSD tag you could take the five minutes, look at their respective articles and add a rationale yourself if the image is warranted. Tbh what you're doing isn't really constructive at all. - 66.19.201.152 (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

I noticed you tagged The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past as having an excessive amount of copyrighted material. As of this typing, the page has box art(required), a screenshot illustrating gameplay(required), a sreenshot illustrating the prologue(probably excessive), the album cover(likely helpful), a page from the graphic novel(could be too much, could be helpful), and a screenshot illustrating the gameplay of Four Swords(helpful). I am unaware of anything else that could be construed as copyrighted material. If the screenshot of the prologue were removed, would that satisfy the tag, or would another image need to go? Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

In case you didn't return to my talk page, I wanted to let you know about the AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Same-sex unions in flux, since you expressed an interest in the article. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, and thanks for looking after some of the fair use images around Wikipedia. I've improved several fair use rationales on images included on List of characters in Fire Emblem: The Sacred Stones according to your suggestions.

I wanted to point out a minor technicality, though. Your use of {{dfu}} on image pages with disputed rationales is correct, but {{deletable image-caption}} on article pages implies that a disputed fair use rationale is a criterion for speedy deletion (in contradiction of WP:CSD#F6). Instead, you might try a caption like "<small>This image's fair use rationale is disputed. It may be deleted after seven days from the date of the dispute, if uncontested.</small>". Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 01:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi. I came over to mention an AfD here, but wanted to point out that "dfu" is a speedy criterion under WP:CSD#F7: "Invalid fair-use claims tagged with {{subst:dfu}} may be deleted seven days after they are tagged, if a full and valid fair-use use rationale is not added." This is likely why {{Di-disputed fair use rationale}} suggests that contributors "Add following to the image captions: {{deletable image-caption}}". Concerns with that should probably be addressed to WT:CSD, since many contributors are likely to follow the directions on the template. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 11:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Ah, good catch. Vague templates are vague. Maybe I can suggest an improvement there. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 00:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, I've been far too busy recently to provide any significant amount of coaching, but the comments I've made in the past (particularly the one when I started the coaching off the top of my head) still stand. Take a set of articles on topics you enjoy and start improving them. If you don't know how, look at GA or FA examples of similar articles. If you still need help, go to the relevant WikiProject and ask for aid. Participation in the normal editing process provides you with knowledge of most of our policies and guidelines and a fairly natural manner as you edit. It's gradual and will take time but is ultimately satisfying (and is the reason we're all here). — sephiroth bcr ^(converse) 08:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

I noticed that you tagged the Maniac Mansion article with the non-free tag. Please let me know what media warrants the tag so I can fix the problem. Thank you. Rzrscm (talk) 01:01, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

You know, it would be nice if you added quick rationales to those fair-use game screenshots that are obviously valid, but just lack the rationale. --Apoc2400 (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi. This little form letter is just a courtesy notice to let you know that a proposal to merge the projects Wikipedia:WikiProject Free images, Wikipedia:WikiProject Fair use, Wikipedia:WikiProject Moving free images to Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration into the newly formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media has met with general support at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Files. Since you're on the rosters of membership in at least one of those projects, I thought you might be interested. Conversation about redirecting those projects is located here. Please participate in that discussion if you have any interest, and if you still have interest in achieving the goals of the original project, we'd love to have you join in. If you aren't interested in either the conversation or the project, please pardon the interruption. :) Thanks. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

P.S. Hi. :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Will you be interested in giving an Editor assistance in Ice Hockey World Championships article. Thank you Andreyx109 (talk) 02:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

I'll take a look at it, I can't guarantee I'll be able to solve the problem, but I don't try we'll never know. Thanks for informing me about this. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 22:12, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Here is a list with all articles about the albanian Metal band Troja:

• [6]
• [7]
• [8]
• [9]
• [10]
• [11]
• [12]

I hope that this articles are good references for my article. More pages are at [13] Goroth 22:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goroth (talk • contribs)

It is a beginning I think, but more good references isn't easy to find about Troja, because it is an very unknown band.... But we can use the references from GAZETAEXPRESS and BALKANINSIGHT....I'm very sorry but I don't if SPIRIT OF METAL and the other SITE is useful, too. I don't know that FACEBOOK and the GERMAN WIKIPEDIA ARTICLE about Troja were not good references but it is good to know...THANK YOU =) Goroth 21:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.183.19 (talk)

As you know, Penubag is working on a banner to advertise the Outline WikiProject. And he's almost done.

The banner prominently presents the "Outline of chocolate", which of course will become the most widely advertised outline as soon as the banner goes live. The first thing many editors will do after seeing the banner is look for that outline.

The problem is, we don't have one.

So that's our first outline collaboration!

I started a draft this morning.

It needs to be finished and moved to the article namespace before we can start using Penubag's banner ad!

Come join in on the fun. It's chocolate!

The Transhumanist 22:07, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

I elaborated, but I might have not have explained good enough. It was explained well in this AFD, but it feels odd to link to an AFD to a different article in a nomination. Joe Chill (talk) 16:23, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Pardon me, but is there a reason why you accepted that submission? We are currently in the process of reviewing a large number of AfC submissions in a batch, and although you are free to improve and give comments on the article, I'm curious as to why you accepted it when I was in the middle of modifying it. Thanks! The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 19:23, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Ah, I didn't see your comment on the batch discussion page. My apologies. The Earwig (Talk | Contribs) 19:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposing a 7 minute old article for deletion is ridiculous. - Denimadept (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Nah, we're cool. <3 --Yuefairchild (talk) 05:32, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello. I noticed your report at AIV[14], which is quite lucky because most reports of this type are simply removed without blocking. Open proxies are better reported to WP:OP if there's no particular hurry. It might also be an idea to have a fresh read of Wikipedia:Open proxies. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:45, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

TNXMan 11:52, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Could I ask you to clarify your reasoning for these edits: [15][16]? Equazcion (talk) 18:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Hello, please see this lengthy RfC and in particular the final conclusion which has instructions for contesting the deletion of specific "future templates" --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry but I won't undelete the template. Per the RFC it was a valid deletion. Garion96 (talk) 07:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Re Wikipedia:Featured article review/Voting system/archive1: please at least notify the nominator mentioned in Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Voting system, along with the top few editors mentioned in the edit count. Eubulides (talk) 20:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Sakura Cartelet … I'm not sure how useful this Category will be, but let's see how long it lasts before Some Other Editor takes it to WP:CFD. :-) Happy Editing! — 138.88.43.201 (talk · contribs) _{22:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)}

Wow … 3,465 pages are in this category (as of today) … I guess a lot of editors are using this template! :-) — 138.88.125.101 (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2009 (UTC) Note that my IP has changed.

I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 07:01, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello Feinoha, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Devin Ross has been removed. It was removed by Eagles247 with the following edit summary '(signed by Eagles, expand, add infobox, rmv deletion tag)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Eagles247 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 08:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 08:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

hi! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Force101 (talk • contribs)

how do you add user boxes to your talk pages?--Force101 (talk) 23:12, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Force101

This is a sockpuppet that continues to return to harass people. Personally, I don't believe he should be given any help. Goodvac (talk) 23:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I had noticed and was about to come and thank you. So, thank you! :) KingOfTheMedia (talk) 20:45, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

CAN YOU PLEASE HELP ME AND TELL ME HOW TO PUT PICTURES ON YOUR PROFILE!--Iron-Maiden4335 01:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Oh but does it have to be from wikipedia?--Iron-Maiden4335 01:36, 13 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iron-Maiden4335 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 13 May 2010 (UTC) ok thx for that i will try and if i need help on anything i know i can contact you!--Iron-Maiden4335 01:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Well i did but it wont work can you put a picture of this pokemon on my profile please, it is called chikorita ok? thx--Iron-Maiden4335 02:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iron-Maiden4335 (talk • contribs)

I confirm that I have requested Account Creation access. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 20:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. FunPika 21:02, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Ok sorry i will try my best at putting a picture on my profil--Iron-Maiden4335 21:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iron-Maiden4335 (talk • contribs)

Hey, can you block this moron from editing the IIHF Page? Or what can i do in such cases? Kante4 (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Since you were here longer and i saw you undid his version, i thought i may just ask since i´m pretty new. ;) Kante4 (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I am new as a contributor and added a short article on co-motherhood which was immediately suggested for deletion after the same person suggested I change my username, which I did. Here is the discussion on the deletion:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Co-motherhood From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia < Wikipedia:Articles for deletion Jump to:navigation, search [edit] Co-motherhood Co-motherhood (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log • AfD statistics) (Find sources: "Co-motherhood" – news • books • scholar • images) position paper by WP:COI author UtherSRG (talk) 05:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. -- JOHN VANDENBERG (CHAT) 07:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Delete It would be better if this was covered in the LGBT parenting article, no reason to fork a specific term. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 07:47, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Redirect I think by this you actually meen we need redirecting? Deletion meens that there will be no mention of this term at all in Wikipedia. I added the term because it was lacking. If it is searchable after redirection I see that as a good alternative.OKjustchange (talk) 03:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)— OKjustchange (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. • Redirect to LGBT parenting per Pax Vobiscum. (I don't think deletion is appropriate because this is a plausible search term, and because I don't think Co-motherhood should be a redlink that encourages inexperienced users to write an article there.)—S Marshall Talk/Cont 09:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Delete without redirect. For essay-type papers like this, there is a discussion about adding CSD criteria. — Timneu22 • talk 13:12, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • AfD isn't a vote, so please explain your rationale for the "delete without redirect". I'm aware of the discussion about adding a new CSD criterion, but I haven't felt the need to comment on it because I don't think it'll go anywhere.—S Marshall Talk/Cont 13:24, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Redirect to LGBT parenting; perfectly valid and useful search-term.--BelovedFreak 13:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • Delete and no redirect. Unsourced POV soapbox essay from the very first sentence, with statements like "the spouse of the new mother will legally and morally be considered the father of the child, although he may not be the biological father." Leave the legal and moral judgments to someone else please. While it appears that "co-mother" is a term used in situations where two women have a sexual relationship and both participate in the raising of children in the household, and would be a logical search term, this rant doesn't need to be preserved in a history. Mandsford 14:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC) • If you think this term should be described in a simpler or clearer way, I suggest you edit it. I think this is concise and refers only to facts.OKjustchange (talk) 03:57, 14 May 2010 (UTC)— OKjustchange (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. • Delete as content fork. Uncle Dick (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2010 (UTC) • The reason for this article is that this term is not found or mentioned in any other article as far as I can see. "Content fork" does not apply. OKjustchange (talk)06:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC) — OKjustchange (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. • Delete and redirect per above. Useight (talk) 14:52, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

As you can see, the article was deleted and re-directed to LGBT parenting as some users suggested, but still there is no mention of the term co-motherhood in the article it was re-directed to. As a new contributor I would not wish to edit other peoples articles but I understand you are participating in a group to improve the LGBT parenting article. Please feel free to use my article in editing your article, if you wish:

Co-motherhood From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

When a married heterosexual couple have a child by the use of assisted reproductive technology, the spouse of the new mother will legally and morally be considered the father of the child, although he may not be the biological father. In the same way, homosexual lesbian couples can have children. The role and status of the non-biological mother or co-mother, is called co-motherhood. In some countries, such as the Netherlands and Australia, there is an approximation towards equal legal rights for all parents, regardless of sexual orientation. This includes the right to co-maternity leave and many other rights, responsibilities and obligations assumed by fathers.

[edit] See also LGBT parenting

[edit] External Links http://www.starobserver.com.au/news/2009/11/10/lesbian-parents-win-recognition/18148 [1] http://www.ru.nl/vox/archief/zoek_op_nummer/nummers_%28index/jaargang_4/inhoudsopgave_5/scriptie_piekerende/ [2] http://www.samesexmarriage.ca/legal/qc_civil_unions.htm [3] "The papers and TV here are full of "civil union" and stories of lesbian co-motherhood. The people who appeared at the Commission hearings in Québec said..."

[edit] References [1] [2] [3]

[4] 1. ^ Karla Mason Bergen, Elizabeth A. Suter, Karen L. Daas (July 2006). "About as Solid as a Fish Net": Symbolic Construction of a Legitimate Parental Identity for Nonbiological Lesbian Mothers". 'Journal of Family Communication, Volume 6, Issue 3. pp. 201 - 220. http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a785035755&db=all. "Nonbiological lesbian mothers lack not only biological ties to their children, but have no legal ties..." 2. ^ Machteld Vonk, Molengraaff Institute for Private Law, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands (2004). "One, Two or Three Parents? Lesbian Co-Mothers and a Known Donor with ‘Family Life’ under Dutch Law". 'Oxford Journals, Int. Jnl. of Law, Policy and the Family,Volume 18, Number 1. pp. 103-117. http://lawfam.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/18/1/103. "In recent years much attention has been paid to the equal treatment of same-sex couples in the Netherlands." 3. ^ Erin Hadley, M.A. and Jennifer Stuart, Ph.D. (2010). "The Expression of Parental Identifications in Lesbian Mothers' Work and Family Arrangements". 'Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing.. http://pep.gvpi.net/document.php?id=ppsy.026.0042a. "We also find a range of experience in reactions to biological motherhood and co-motherhood." 4. ^ Queensland Government (17 August 2009). "Same-Sex Model Review". Department of Justice and Attorney. http://www.justice.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/21633/same-sex-model-review-17-aug-2009.pdf. ""...there is no justification for excluding co-mothers from the Status of Children Act 1996"" Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-motherhood"

I think this is important as there are new regulations, official application forms and standardized procedures to apply for co-motherhood in different European countries, so it is not a term which should be left totally unmentioned in an encyclopedia. Please, could you forward this to the LGBT group project? OKjustchange (talk) 10:17, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Why are you playing around with the entry "Douglas Eivind Hall" I am his son and he died shortly before I was born. My mother told me all about him. She was Scottish. She put me up for adoption after I was born in the Gaza Strip, Gaza City. Refael Vardi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowellmassachusetts (talk • contribs) 22:16, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

As mentioned on your talk page all article must indicate why someone is notable in order to be included. Also, while I'm sorry to hear that this person died, Wikipedia is not the place for memorials. I hope this helps. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 22:25, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Could you please a prayer for my deceased Dad. Tom Cruise looks like him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lowellmassachusetts (talk • contribs) 22:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

{{Adminhelp}}

Could someone help with the page moves I made when creating the article for WP:AFC, Entanglement (graph measure). I originally moved it to Entanglement (graph mesasure), noticed that the word "measure" was misspelled, so I moved it to Entanglement (graph meassure). After which I noticed that the new page was still misspelled, and finally moved it to the correct title at: Entanglement (graph measure). Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 00:28, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Give me a minute and I'll clean it up for you. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:29, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Right, I've deleted both typo redirects. You should be able to fix any broken links without admin help, but let me know if anyhting else needs deleting. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:33, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Did I do it correctly? Joe Chill (talk) 03:34, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yama nashi ochi nashi imi nashi. Since you had some involvement with the Yama nashi ochi nashi imi nashi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —Farix (t | c) 22:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Wow, this looks obscure. Although you can't use these as sources, [17] and [18] might give you some better context, or images if you need them. And here is the games' website. Sorry I can't help more, but try the Anime project. Tezero (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

The link section has a code, what you would type, and what it looks like. i think that it shouldn't look like a redlink, which it does. Maybe we could create a Redirect to another Example Page??? A Word Of Advice From Beastly20: Don't Be Silly, Wrap Your Willy! 00:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Right now Name of page is protected against created per WP:SALT. I guess if you really think it would be better to change it from a red link to a blue one, maybe changing the link from Name of page to something like Article. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 00:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Whether you came to feed as a result of my plea, or for some other reason, I appreciate the attempt to help. However, I was puzzled by this response:

"Do you have a specific question about the topic? We're not mind readers here."

At the help desk, I expect editors to ask a specific question. However, at the Feedback desk, it is generally understood that the editor is asking for general feedback; in the case of a user draft, such as this, is it ready for main space? Some explicitly ask, but some just post (or attempt to post) the article they have worked on. In this case, User:Liwumi/Ecco2_Corp. (Many new editors don't yet know how to properly link to thee article they've started.) In this case, the editor needs a lot of help.--SPhilbrickT 12:33, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

On a more positive note, thanks for reviewing The National Scout Reserve article. We really could use more reviewers at Feedback, hope you will poke your head in once in a while.--SPhilbrickT 12:44, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

I have cleaned up, because the article looked sililar to a list, who exits already. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.191.28 (talk) 04:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

I took a look at the article after you posted your explanation here. I don't agree with you that the article "looks like a list". I do however, think that the article is getting way too long, and perhaps could be split per the guidelines at WP:SPLIT. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 04:21, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

I splitted the article to other: List of the national championships of the SV Dynamo and List of international winning SV Dynamo sports club athletes. Do you agree?--88.73.191.28 (talk) 04:28, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello, thanks for leaving a message outlining your concerns about the www.contemporaryartdaily.com links I added to a number of artists' websites. While I understand Wikipedia's need to guard against spam and promotion, I think those links pass the Wikipedia guidelines in that they 1. feature relevant copyrighted media content with permission of the exhibition spaces, 2. display many installation views not easily found elsewhere on the net, including at the galleries' pages themselves (compare, e.g., the images of the Jonathan Monk show at the gallery page and at Contemporary Art Daily) and 3. the links direct to index pages which can automatically update with additional material in the future. If you could elaborate on what you think is inappropriate about the presence of the links, that would be very helpful. 24.15.199.147 (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

I removed your links to the Contemporary Art Daily site, based on the the fact that at the time (before you explained it to me), you appeared to be adding them to many articles. I do not have anything against you nor Contemporary Art Daily. I suggest you read Wikipedia:Spam#How not to be a spammer before readding them. If, after reviewing that, you still have more questions please feel free to ask them on my talk page. I hope that made sense. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 18:02, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I did make a mistake by reverting your edits to Holy Cross High School (Connecticut). Sorry about that. Carmichael95 (talk) 01:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Network neutrality has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Feinoha Talk, My master 02:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

This is a waste of time (constantly re-adding contrubutions) and this will be the downfall of wikipedia 184.76.242.14 (talk) 04:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

A problem has been identified at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/list. You may like to read Wikipedia talk:Editor assistance/list#Problem with inactive accounts on the list. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:14, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Just a friendly note on Batrić Jovanović. I declined the speedy as either a quick gsearch or running the link that was in the article through google translate easily showed notability.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 03:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello Feinoha. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on The silence are they powerful enough to defeat the trickster to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Template:PuellaMagi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. JJ98 (Talk) 04:17, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi there, Sakura Cartelet/Archive 1. Just a little request. It seems that Twinkle, quite annoyingly, doesn't mark pages as patrolled even when you tag them for WP:CSD, WP:PROD or WP:AFD. I've just come across an article, that you'd tagged for WP:CSD on the unpatrolled list. I'm sure you already know, but if you scroll down to the bottom of the article, there will be a little link in square brackets that says [mark this page as patrolled]. Clicking that means it'll get taken off the unpatrolled list and so no-one else will come across it on that list. It's not your fault, I know; it's Twinkle's. But until they fix it, it'd be great if you could click that link just before you tag an article. I've marked that one as patrolled. If you didn't find the article via the new pages list then just ignore me; you won't have had the option to mark it as patrolled. Sorry to be a pain. Keep up the good work. — Fly by Night (talk) 04:18, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

You may be interested in a discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:Help desk about a proposal to add an image to the top of the page. Your input would be welcome.

Rcsprinter (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

In reference to my unpublished article for:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eduncan911/Dell_XPS_730X

You removed an image. I thought something was broken, and I added it back. I didn't know you actually removed it.

But it is unclear why you removed it. I followed all of the guidelines for setting the "Non-free promotional" as well as supplying the "Non-free use rationale" along with it, per Wikipedia's guidelines.

So I am unclear why the image was removed from the article, as I clearly state exactly what the image is used for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduncan911 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

As mentioned at WP:UP we are not supposed to add non-free images to user space. You can however link to them by adding a colon in front of the file name. For example, if the file "Example.jpg" were fair use (it isn't) then it would be against policy to display it on user pages. So in order to have it referenced but not shown one would do [[:File:Example.jpg]] which produces File:Example.jpg. Once you are finished making the article, and have moved it into the main namespace, you can "readd" the images by removing the colon. I hope this makes sense. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 01:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

That makes absolute PERFECT sense! Thank you! I didn't know that user spaces had different rules, as I thought it was a draft location as I prepare the document (going to take me weeks to get most of the information in there first).

I will remove the other images as well until ready for publication.

Thank you very much for actually explaining the difference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eduncan911 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

This edit and your edit summary puzzles me. The creator is working on that article, I am working with them in #wikipedia-en-help. They are very new and they placed their content in the wrong place, they mistakenly placed it at Wikipedia :Articles for creation/A Chicago Punk Rock Collaboration For The Kids, Vol 1 instead of in "Talk". Shearonink (talk) 01:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Shearonink (talk) 03:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Hey Sakura Cartelet/Archive 1 :). A quick update on how things are going with the New Page Triage/New Pages Feed project. As the enwiki page notes, the project is divided into two chunks: the "list view" (essentially an updated version of Special:NewPages) and the "article view", a view you'll be presented with when you open up individual articles that contains a toolbar with lots of options to interact with the page - patrolling it, adding maintenance tags, nominating it for deletion, so on.

On the list view front, we're pretty much done! We tried deploying it to enwiki, in line with our Engagement Strategy on Wednesday, but ran into bugs and had to reschedule - the same happened on Thursday :(. We've queued a new deployment for Monday PST, and hopefully that one will go better. If it does, the software will be ready to play around with and test by the following week! :).

On the article view front, the developers are doing some fantastic work designing the toolbar, which we're calling the "curation bar"; you can see a mockup here. A stripped-down version of this should be ready to deploy fairly soon after the list view is; I'm afraid I don't have precise dates yet. When I have more info, or can unleash everyone to test the list view, I'll let you know :). As always, any questions to the talkpage for the project or mine. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey Feinoha! We've finally finished the NPT prototype and deployed it on enwiki. We'll be holding an office hours session on the 16th at 21:00 in #wikimedia-office to show it off, get feedback and plot future developments - hope to see you there! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 03:47, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey all :). A notification that the prototype for the New Pages Feed is now live on enwiki! We had to briefly take it down after an unfortunate bug started showing up, but it's now live and we will continue developing it on-site.

The page can be found at Special:NewPagesFeed. Please, please, please test it and tell us what you think! Note that as a prototype it will inevitably have bugs - if you find one not already mentioned at the talkpage, bring it up and I'm happy to carry it through to the devs. The same is true of any additions you can think of to the software, or any questions you might have - let me know and I'll respond.

Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 13:32, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Articles for Creation is backlogged and needs YOUR help! Articles for Creation is desperately in need of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors and administrators alike, to help us clear a record backlog of pending submissions. There is currently a significant backlog of 1019 submissions waiting to be reviewed. These submissions are generally from new editors who have never edited Wikipedia before. A prompt, constructive review of submissions could significantly editor retention. Do you have what it takes? Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines? Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not? Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions? Are you (at least) autoconfirmed? Can you review submissions based on their individual merits? If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. Click here to review to a random submissionArticle selected by erwin85's random article script on toolserver. We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 1 or 2 reviews, would be extremely beneficial. On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, AndrewN talk 23:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Hey all. Some quick but important updates on what we've been up to and what's coming up next :).

The curation toolbar, our Wikimedia-supported twinkle replacement. We're going to be deploying it, along with a pile of bugfixes, to wikipedia on 9 August. After a few days to check it doesn't make anything explode or die, we'll be sticking up a big notice and sending out an additional newsletter inviting people to test it out and give us feedback :). This will be followed by two office hours sessions - one on Tuesday the 14th of August at 19:00 UTC for all us Europeans, and one on Wednesday the 15th at 23:00 UTC for the East Coasters out there :). As always, these will be held in #wikimedia-office; drop me a note if you want to know how to easily get on IRC, or if you aren't able to attend but would like the logs.

I hope to see a lot of you there; it's going to be a big day for everyone involved, I think :). I'll have more notes after the deployment! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey all :)

A couple of new things.

First, you'll note that all the project titles have now changed to the Page Curation prefix, rather than having the New Pages Feed prefix. This is because the overarching project name has changed to Page Curation; the feed is still known as New Pages Feed, and the Curation Toolbar is still the Curation Toolbar. Hopefully this will be the last namechange ;p.

On the subject of the Curation Toolbar (nice segue, Oliver!) - it's now deployed on Wikipedia. Just open up any article in the New Pages Feed and it should appear on the right.

It's still a beta version - bugs are expected - and we've got a lot more work to do. But if you see something going wrong, or a feature missing, drop me a note or post on the project talkpage and I'll be happy to help :). Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 00:11, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:RioRainbowGate 7660.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 02:02, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey all :). We've just deployed another set of features for Page Curation. They include flyouts from the icons in Special:NewPagesFeed, showing who reviewed an article and when, a listing of this in the "info" flyout, and a general re-jigging of the info flyout - we've also fixed the weird bug with page_titles_having_underscores_instead_of_spaces in messages sent to talkpages, and introduced CSD logging! As always, these features will need some work - but any feedback would be most welcome. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey Sakura Cartelet. This will be, if not our final newsletter, one of the final ones :). After months of churning away at this project, our final version (apart from a few tweaks and bugfixes) is now live. Changes between this and the last release include deletion tag logging, a centralised log, and fixes to things like edit summaries.

Hopefully you like what we've done with the place; suggestions for future work on it, complaints and bugs to the usual address :). We'll be holding a couple of office hours sessions, which I hope you'll all attend. Many thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey all :).

We're (very shortly) closing down this development cycle for Page Curation. It's genuinely been a pleasure to talk with you all and build software that is so close to my own heart, and also so effective. The current backlog is 9 days, and I've never seen it that low before.

However! Closing up shop does not mean not making any improvements. First-off, this is your last chance to give us a poke about unresolved bugs or report new ones on the talkpage. If something's going wrong, we want to know about it :). Second, we'll hopefully be taking another pass over the software next year. If you've got ideas for features Page Curation doesn't currently have, stick them here.

Again, it's been an honour. Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Toaru Majutsu no Index, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 12:22, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

This is just a tribute.

Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either the Article Feedback Tool or Page Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign up here.

In addition, we'll be holding an office hours session at 21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 10:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Articles for creation newsletter

The WikiProject Articles for creation Newsletter Volume I, No. I – December 2012 Visit the Articles for creation homepage Project news Five changes have been proposed to the AfC policy. Join the discussion here. Another change has been proposed to the courtesy blanking policy. It involves CSDing distributive submissions. Discuss it here. The beta script still needs testing. Learn how you can help here. The backlog is at emergency status and another drive has been proposed here and suggestions on changes to the structure have been proposed here. Discussion on updating the backlog notification is underway here. A discussion on whether autoconfirmed users are allowed to skip the backlog is going on here. Discussion on users not adding categories and not checking copyvios is going on here. Backlog news[1] There are 1017 pending submissions in the backlog. You can help! Article rankings[1]  FA  GA B C Start Stub  FL List Category Disambig Draft File Project Redirect Template NA ??? Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WikiProject Articles for creation  articles by quality     Refresh From the Editors This is the very first newsletter for WikiProject Articles for creation! If you find any errors or have suggestions on what to improve/include in future newsletters, please leave a message here. Contributors to this Issue Dom497 (talk · contribs) Nathan2055 (talk · contribs) Notes ^ a b Information may not be current due to caching. Click here to purge this page's server cache. Script corner: Stable: v4.1.15 - Beta: v4.1.16b2 v4.1.16b2 is now available in the beta channel! Reviewers can use the beta version of the script by following the instructions here and should report bugs here! Release notes can be found here as well as in the source code. If you are JavaScript savvy, please contact Nathan2055 (talk · contribs) if you wish to help with development. Reviewing articles and more since 2005!

Delivered by User:EdwardsBot on behalf of Wikiproject Articles for Creation at 14:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Delivered at 13:06, 19 June 2013 (UTC) by EdwardsBot (talk), on behalf of WikiProject AFC

This newsletter was delivered on behalf of WPAFC by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:36, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) at 09:21, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello Feinoha! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:CharismaDoll.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. James086^Talk 04:29, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Feinoha! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 12:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey there, I've protected your user page and user talk page for a couple of days. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Hello Feinoha, It says on WP:UAA that usernames cannot be reported unless it has been used in the last 2-3 weeks. There are still countless name violations, even if their pages have been left untouched. That's why I've been leaving these messages. Evking22 (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, but since these haven't been used in a long time (if ever caveat since I'm not an admin I can't check their deleted contribs) I guess it's okay to keep doing that. Although if it was recently created/used then report away. Feinoha ^Talk 23:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm currently in the process of making the article that is why I removed what was there. It will take me a few hours to complete the article but it will be up shortly. User:KieranWard94 (talk) 00:19, 06 May 2016 (UTC)

Oh that makes sense now thanks for explaining your actions to me. Although next time you could avoid confusion by making sure to use an edit summary to explain your future plans. Feinoha ^Talk 00:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi Feinoha! Just letting you know that I responded to your talk page message via email :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

I read the message and will wait till the time's right like you requested. :) Feinoha ^Talk 21:06, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Do you read the talk page guidelines per WP:BLANKING? Added ow template under that. KGirlTrucker87 ^{talk what I'm been doing} 22:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Yeah I just re-read it again. The problem I typically notice is that when anons remove the warnings (that are not old/obsolete) it tends to result in people (and bots in particular) issuing the same warnings ie {{Uw-vandalism1}} multiple times which results in the vandal doing more damage before an admin can stop them. That said if it was old/ancient (a few days ago for IPs) or maybe a few months for users I try to not revert unless they are replacing the talk page with personal attacks and similar things. That said if they remove it more than twice I just leave it alone since I don't want to edit war with anons/users over something that is (usually) trivial Feinoha ^Talk 03:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello Feinoha; removed section on Hellenization entry since it appears to be a reinsertion of biased politicized content unconfirmed by any reliable secondary sources. Theban Halberd (talk) 04:26, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Okay then. Fee free to re-instate the content removal (assuming you haven't done so already), since the removal has now been explained. Feinoha ^Talk 18:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Not vandalising. Improving the page. It looks like a press release. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.21.191.71 (talk) 18:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

But you keep deleting stuff from the page without commenting on the talk page so it looks similar to vandalism or at least disruptive editing. Feinoha ^Talk 18:37, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry not my intention. I'm new to this. I'm trying to remove its press release style writing. Also I have nominated Pablo Ganguli for deletion. Please have a look. He's a total nobody it seems but his page is bigger than Sharon Stone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.21.191.71 (talk) 18:38, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Nah I use twinkle too that is about the only tool I use. The way to do it is to go to the edit discussion for the day's page (in this case for example Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_May_23 then just manually take out the section header for the second listing. Leave the listing of course. Each of the individual entries has a "span" tag (I can't remember if it is HTTP or Wikimarkup off the top of me head) that will still mean the individual discussion headers at the redirect pages will refer back to it perfectly happily, so that's no problem, just take out the section header just the header. Not your fault not mine not anyone's, the second one was closed in really quite a hurry before I had a chance to combine or ask people if it was oK to combine. They're both red now so no big deal but just if that makes sense to you as kinda a "trick of the trade". Si Trew (talk) 13:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

I am sorry my brother did something all of the spelling stuff. Can you revert please for me. I am sorry about it Spyker120 (talk) 13:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

I am very sorry. I have reverted all of the changes my baby brother did. I hope you forgive me. Spyker120 (talk) 13:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Yes I am aware not to write about my self. Studley oak, is Not me. I would appreciate it if you left the page alone. Thank you. Nick (Studley Oak) Forbus (talk) 23:10, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

you are welcome to change the title, I was planning on doing that but I am not sure how seeing as I just joined about thirty minutes ago to make the page. thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reginacorn (talk • contribs) 01:55, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

That timeline is prone to vandalism. This is the only way to prevent it from changing from time to time without an election. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 02:26, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Okay I finally now see what you were trying to do. I initially got a bit confused when you (appeared) to be deleting some text without an (apparent) explanation and replacing it with a (then) non-existing template. I think it would of been less of a chance of misunderstanding if you had either created the template first then replaced the text or put something similar in the edit reason to make your intentions clear. Feinoha ^Talk 02:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

Hi,

That same anonymous user you sent a message to yesterday from the Big E Langston page has been doing the same thing on multiple pages, most frequently on The Usos page. He keeps changing the information to what he believes is the correct information, and every time you revert his edit, he reverts it back. He's been edit warring with me all day, and won't quit even though I've given him multiple warnings. There's a discussion I've created here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents. Dohvahkiin (talk) 16:54, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing Klamath Falls Carnegie Library, Feinoha.

Unfortunately Altamel has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

The article is copyvio from the Facebook post that it cites. I shall attempt to rewrite the text and find a better source, but if that fails, no choice but G12.

To reply, leave a comment on Altamel's talk page.

I think your stupid I reedited my home towns page and fyi I'm 12 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.168.160.187 (talk) 11:00, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing Deepak Lahari, Feinoha.

Unfortunately I dream of horses has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This isn't a good enough article to pass CSD standards.

To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page. —Preceding undated comment added 20:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

It looks like Randykitty agreed with me though. Feinoha ^Talk 19:49, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

I want to put a BLP prod on them-but I'm not sure how many of those guys are even alive is the problem, not sure what to say about it. Wgolf (talk) 03:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

I just sent an admin a note about it. Wgolf (talk) 04:06, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Done, and I've also blocked the IP. I'll keep an eye on the page. Hut 8.5 15:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello Feinoha. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. — MusikAnimal ^talk 23:35, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

I didn't even start it. Don't tell me to stop personal attacking. He personal attacked me first, he's threatening me. Please ban him from the wiki. 2600:1000:B004:A681:80EF:E833:C1F6:E93B (talk) 02:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

One (assuming that you are also 174.192.13.32 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)) regardless of what the other person did (or didn't do) it's not right to use the edit summaries you did. Two I'm not (currently) an admin and can't ban (or as it's called on Wikipedia, block) anyone. Three which is somewhat in line with what I said in number 1, please check the following page before continuing the dispute with the other user. Feinoha ^Talk 02:49, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

No, I am not "that" IP user at all, and secondly. Blame me all I want. 2600:1000:B017:DBB9:CC1F:39DA:2F26:DE53 (talk) 03:14, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Well then I'm sorry about the mix-up then. You came here after I warned the particular anon that I mentioned above so I assumed that you were the same person. Since (you claim) to not be the same, there's nothing to worry about then. Feinoha ^Talk 03:20, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sakura Cartelet,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, i have a question about my recently deleted article, you had nothing to do with it, but i just need someone to guide me as i am new to the system, originally i took about an hour to write about a fictional charactor in my completed book,As Time Settles, but it was instant deleted and marked as vandilism? My question is why is a fictional charactor like Spock allowed to have an entry?

Well in the case of Spock, we have an article for him because he has plenty of reliable (real world) sources that discuss his impact on the media, people's reactions to him etc. If you want your fictional character to have an article, maybe you should try Wikia. Their guidelines for inclusion is (generally speaking) much less stringent than that of Wikipedia and may allow for content that we can't or don't want to have here. PS. Sorry for the late reply. Feinoha ^Talk 01:22, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Sakura Cartelet,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Please help me. The false-positive sensor is broken in templates for lines on the Los Angeles Metro. The sensor will only let me blank those pages and will not let me restore back the revision before the page was blanked and it will not let me constructively edit the page. 71.198.231.208 (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

This is serious. It's preventing me from making any useful contributions to the LA Metro Line Templates. 71.198.231.208 (talk) 07:59, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry to hear about that, but as I don't have the necessary rights (and ability/knowledge) I can't fix the problem with the filters. However if you try to explain your edits in detail, I could try to see if I could do them for you. Feinoha ^Talk 17:19, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello. I've just spotted this edit. Although the revision you selected is technically the more accurate, it was not a case of vandalism or any other type of edit that required WP:ROLLBACK. In fact, it wasn't a test either. The name of Kosovo is rendered by many people as Kosova when using English including by its majority population. The version Kosova sits behind Kosovo as the preferred name but it is by no means wrong. The user acted without consensus, of that there is no doubt. But it was clearly a good faith edit whereby he/she had hoped for his/her revision to set the standard. I just thought I'd let you know for future reference. Thanks. --OJ (talk) 20:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Well at the time I did the rollback I noticed that they had both linked to a nonexistent page and apparently changed one letter from Kosovo to Kosova which at the time of the revert appeared to be a form of test edit or at least minor vandalism (I only learned later via research that yes there is a Kosova). Admittedly I probably should have used undo instead of rollback in this particular case, however I can't "undo" (no pun intended) my rollback and change it to an undo, so I'll just have to pay more attention when using it in the future. Feinoha ^Talk 00:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

No no, of course we can't cancel former actions! I never thought for a moment your intentions were bad. After all, my revision and yours are the same for all the reasons you provided. It happens across Kosovo-related pages frequently that an editor will come along and change the name of a settlement or municipality from its Albanian to Serbian or vice-versa. About half the articles are in one language name and the other half the opposing. So the correct name for English Wikipedia is moot. Anyhow, thanks for your warm and well-meaning reply. regards. --OJ (talk) 07:52, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)