User talk:Lihaas/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Lihaas. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

→

Archive 15

You probably have a notification that I undid your making 2013 attack on Pakistan Embassy in Tripoli into a redirect. Please ignore that, as I have undone my undo upon reviewing the sources. --LukeSurl ^{t c} 11:40, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Consensus has been reached to keep this article. I see no DELETE's, some MERGE's but a clear majority of KEEP. Bhtpbank (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to CNN controversies may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)

see how he said it both times."<ref>[http://www.wwe.com/inside/cenaoncnnvideo/ WWE: Inside WWE > Cena: Steroids? Absolutely not<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.wwe.com/inside/ !-- Bot generated title -->]</ref><ref>[http://www.wwe.com/inside/news/noapology WWE: Inside WWE > News > CNN to WWE: No Apology<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Calling Paula Zahn 'Sexy'"], Zap2It, January 6, 2002</ref>{{Failed verification|date=May 2010}} -->

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Child singer may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *(1928- ) ([[Shirley Temple]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Domodedovo International Airport bombing may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• January 2011}} ([http://www.webcitation.org/5w523U1Qi Archived] at [[WebCite]])</ref> Georgia,<ref>[http://www.civil.ge/eng/article.php?id=23079</ref> Hungary,<ref>{{cite web|language=Hungarian|url=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:38, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Citizenship Act (Slovakia) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• right to vote]] in [[Elections in the European Union|elections]] for the [[European Parliament]]]].{{or|date=June 2012}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 United Nations Climate Change Conference may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• be part of the internal discussions." Oxfam' Executive Director Winnie Byanyima said: "Governments] must...come back in 2014 ready for meaningful discussions on how they will deliver their share of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:36, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

On 25 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article United Nations Security Council Resolution 2118, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that amidst the Syrian civil war, according to United Nations Security Council Resolution 2118, Syria has until mid-2014 to eliminate its chemical weapons? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/United Nations Security Council Resolution 2118. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Lihaas. I started following the case of the mass graves more closely after you posted a link on the Mexican Drug War talkpage a while ago. When you posted on the page, the toll was at 18; just a few minutes ago, the count is up to 48—and there's probably more still out there. I just felt like telling you about this, just in case you're interested. Thanks and happy editing, ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 05:47, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Armenian Genocide recognition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to MK

Media of India (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Establishment

War rape (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Burden of proof

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Central African Republic conflict under the Djotodia administration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Law and order

Nicolás Maduro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blackout

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act .

While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and edit wars may be slow-moving, spanning weeks or months. Edit wars are not limited to 24 hours.

If you are unclear how to resolve a content dispute, please see dispute resolution. You are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus.

If you feel your edits might qualify as one of the small list of exceptions, please apply them with caution and ensure that anyone looking at your edits will come to the same conclusion. If you are uncertain, seek clarification before continuing. Quite a few editors have found themselves blocked for misunderstanding and/or misapplying these exceptions. Often times, requesting page protection or a sockppuppet investigation is a much better course of action.

Continued edit warring on Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act or any other article may cause you to be blocked without further notice.

It's clear that you are aware of WP:EW by your posts on User talk:Notabede and your multiple blocks for edit warring. That you have knowingly continued the EW is grounds for blocking. I strongly urge you to self-revert. Toddst1 (talk) 18:20, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, regarding your recent reverts at Delhi legislative assembly elections, 2013:

• You ask where the BLP issue exists. The answer is that it is an unsourced statement about a redlinked person who may not wish to be even associated with the politics of that party
• Standard election box or not, see this and get consensus, bearing in mind WP:OSE and WP:NPOV.

Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 13:16, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

See also this thread at WT:INB. Ta. - Sitush (talk) 13:29, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

You didn't get involved in the above two threads nor in the one at NPOVN that is linked to on the article talk page. Yet you've gone edit warred against consensus. If you cannot see what is undue weight in that infobox then you need to re-read the policy because the issue is not whether similar non-neutral presentations happen on other articles. - Sitush (talk) 05:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

The sources you talk about, when they talk about the coup they talk about the events from March. The overall conflict which started in December 2012 and still continues is called the Central African Republic conflict. The coup was just one phase of the conflict. The new article you created is good, it can talk about the new phase of the conflict. But we need an article that talks about the overall conflict. If you want an article that solely talks about the coup than create one. Otherwise please don't engage in an edit war and discuss the issue on the talk page. EkoGraf (talk) 22:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

I get what your problem is, you are in the belief that the conflict that started in December 2012 ended in April 2013 and that a new one started. This is incorrect. There are no sources saying that the conflict that started in December ever ended. It entered a new phase in April but it never ended. And your attempt of an example about the Egypt coup is also incorrect. The Egypt coup was one phase in the overall 2012–13 Egyptian protests. So, I am recommending once again that you create a sub-article of the conflict that will deal with the coup phase. EkoGraf (talk) 22:21, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

70 candidates !! Link : http://www.bjpdelhi.org/candidatelist.php --182.64.138.232 (talk) 15:55, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 14:52, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Murder in Samarkand may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Craig Murray's blog |accessdate=18 July 2008 }}</ref> forms an account of Murray's controversial{{why} ambassadorship at the UK embassy in [[Tashkent]] in 2002–04. The tale explains how Murray

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to EVM and Harsh Vardhan

Thai general election, 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to In absentia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Please see the reasons for my edit on Bali Package (which you reverted), here. -- Pikolas (talk) 00:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm confused by the convoluted path of discussion regarding German federal election, 2013 at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates. It seems the topic now is represented by Third Merkel cabinet, and the discussion is closed with only three comments. What's going on? — does this mean it will be posted on Dec. 17?

Agreement to form a "Grand coalition" government was reached nearly a month ago. The ex-journalist in me is dismayed at how long it's taken to get this noteworthy event into ITN. Sca (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

— Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 16:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I noticed your request at WP:RPP for the BJP article. What I don't get is...where is the content dispute? The history shows just three users who have done some serious editing in the past few days...one is me (in fact I made a big blunder which the 2nd user pointed out and I promptly fixed it), then there is the 2nd user who is working on it and most recently, the 3rd who just undid one of their own edit. The only actual reverts were for some anons who kept blanking content, which was the reason I stepped in. I know this is silly but I'm just curious why was this reported at the RPP, have I missed anything big? Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:42, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
6		Tasty nightclub raid (talk)						Add sources
3,208		Sudan (talk)						Add sources
250		Dinka people (talk)						Add sources
2		Sydney Pride Centre (talk)						Add sources
33		Toonen v. Australia (talk)						Add sources
4		Kamchybek Tashiev (talk)						Add sources
302		Same-sex marriage law in the United States by state (talk)						Cleanup
78		Bloody Code (talk)						Cleanup
6		CIA activities in Sudan (talk)						Cleanup
16		Radja (talk)						Expand
46		Foreign relations of Sudan (talk)						Expand
2,064		Tajikistan (talk)						Expand
12,924		Krrish 3 (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,188		2012 Benghazi attack (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
617		East Pakistan (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
246		Boomerang Generation (talk)						Merge
33		Australian Human Rights Commission (talk)						Merge
638		Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani (talk)						Merge
99		Politics of Sudan (talk)						Wikify
1		Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America - Peoples’ Trade Treaty (talk)						Wikify
46		Capital punishment in Indonesia (talk)						Wikify
10		The Death Penalty: Opposing Viewpoints (talk)						Orphan
13		Water conflict between Ethiopia and Kenya (talk)						Orphan
1		Youth of the Centre-Democrats (talk)						Orphan
27		James Wani Igga (talk)						Stub
7		South Sudan Democratic Movement (talk)						Stub
20		S v Makwanyane (talk)						Stub
4		SX News (talk)						Stub
11		Elections in South Sudan (talk)						Stub
4		South Sudan Supreme Court (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chilean general election, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wake Forest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on AAP Manifesto (2013 Delhi Assembly), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Rivalnator (talk) 19:30, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes, i did not added ref but will add later. No probs. :) -Nizil (talk) 05:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Those links were directed to the pages that were not existing on wiki at that time. Even now, some of the links in the section "Constituency-wise results" refers to the articles about real persons that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Logical1004 (talk) 06:14, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

What's WTA? Rothorpe (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

—David Levy 03:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

It's in the first sentence of the first reference: "South Sudan’s president Salva Kiir has expressed uncertainty over whether the new nation’s first general elections since independence will be held on schedule in 2015." Number 57 16:42, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

It is also confirmed by the CIA world factbook "National Legislative Assembly - last held 11-15 April 2010 (next to be held in 2015)", and the country's constitution - see article 66 - "The term of the National Legislature shall be four years from July 9, 2011". This is identical to article 100 ("The tenure of the office of the President of the Republic of South Sudan shall be four years, commencing from July 9, 2011."). Number 57 12:08, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

PS, re your reverting Pristino on the Chilean article, the simple solution was to put "Reactions" as the same level heading as "Results". This is how it's generally done elsewhere (as is having "President" etc as second level headings). Number 57 12:14, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

I responded on the talk page of the article. But I am going to say the same thing to you here on your talk page. First, you removed the additional source I provided that confirms all three helicopters were hit by gunfire and the CNN source that was already in the article also counts three helicopters, not the two you claim. Read the sources before reverting please and refrain from accusations like blind reverts. Second, your source for the 66 dead is ok, but its out-of-date. Its only for the first day of fighting. The 500 figure is from 2 days ago, thus more up-to-date. And according to Wikipedia policy, more up-to-date info supercedes older information. You don't see us puting in the casualties section of WW2 the number of dead being between day 1 of the war and the last day of the war. Also, your comments about the UN show a bit of a personal POV about them as a source. Wikipedia consideres the UN a reliable and authoritative source. So please, personal feelings aside. Thank you. EkoGraf (talk) 09:17, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

I got one more source for you [1] that confirms the figure of 500 dead, and its the South Sudan authorities this time (which were in essence the ones who reported the initial 66 figure thus they updated). Now you have both the UN and the South Sudan government saying the same number. Hope that's enough confirmation. I'm going to add the other source as well. Cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 09:43, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

You are not listening. I added a new source stated BY A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL who also says 500. So we now have both the UN and a government minister saying 500. That's double confirmation from two different sources, one of which is highly credible. And you removed it altogether. So please STOP reinserting the 66 number because IT IS OUT-OF-DATE. And by the way, that 66 figure was also according to an official of the government military hospital. That means the government has updated its figures with the 500 number. Also the CNN source says THREE helicopters not two, and I added even one more source saying THREE helicopters not two. And you removed the new source I added and ignoring what the cited CNN source says again reverted back to two helicopters and not three. So please stop removing sourced info (500 dead per UN and a government minister), stop removing sources (sources for the UN and government figure), stop reverting to old info (66 dead from 1st day per a government official), stop reverting to info that is not according to cited sources (2 helos vs 3 helos). EkoGraf (talk) 14:06, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Made changes in the article to reflect the infobox as you requested. Citing we got both a government official AND the UN quoting their sources saying 500 have died. So please stop inserting 66 in the infobox. We are waaaay past that. EkoGraf (talk) 14:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Added up to four different sources now for the 500 figure. The UN, a government official, a Juba hospital and a BBC report saying the 500 number has become official. EkoGraf (talk) 14:47, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

I've started a discussion about the comments regarding "the international news media". PraetorianFury (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

hi. can you tutor me and show me how to edit? i know i made a few bad edits, vandalism as it's called here, but that was just for fun and i got tired of it. what kind of good editing can i do? --BigBadJohn1 (talk) 01:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I cant understand the inclusion of "Christian self-defence militia" before Anti-balaka, as other groups, militias, etc...are not defined like that in other war infoboxes (I dont see, for example, "Shi'a Muslim militia" before Hezbollah in any infobox). As far as I know, for defining them you have their own WP article. Also, for a simple issue of balance and NPOV, the other groups in the infobox must be defined if Anti-Balaka is defined. So, unless you have a good reason for making that distinction, please revert your changes. Regards,--HCPUNXKID (talk) 22:12, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

I agree, Anti-balaka militia (or militias) would be fine. --HCPUNXKID (talk) 22:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2013 South Sudanese political crisis page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

South Sudanese general election, 2015 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Warrap

United Nations Mission in South Sudan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Akobo

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Greetings! It would be great if you gave us your opinion on this discussion. Thanks. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 12:58, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

The text you re-added I removed, it duplicates the text that I re-added after accidentally deleting it. see [2] Werieth (talk) 11:29, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bangladeshi general election, 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Daily Star

M23 rebellion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to DDR

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

On 9 January 2014, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Bangladeshi general election, 2014, which you substantially updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 09:27, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

The edit has been removed from the history of the article. In the future, I would recommend contacting the oversight team. The oversight team is a group of users than can remove edits that involve sensitive information so that not even administrators can view it. While we really appreciate you trying to bring this issue to our attention, I would encourage you to not post these types of issues on the administrators noticeboard. It's a highly viewed page and when sensitive information is involved it would be best to minimize its visibility as much as possible. Thanks! Mike V • Talk 03:06, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Lihaas! Thank you very much for your invitation, but I'm not really interested in agriculture. I'm mostly interested in politics and history of South Sudan... But, I always like to help and collaborate with other editors if I'm interested in the subject of collaboration. If you need help with something else, I'd be happy to help you, if I can. I hope you'll find someone willing to help you about the agricultural page. Cheers! --Sundostund (talk) 13:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion on material to include on The Lawn. I'm not sure that I see the parts of the article about which you have referenceability concerns. Can you clarify on the Talk page or here?

Also, the question you left in the page's comment regarding "the UVA owned slave with a room on the Lawn" - there were a great many slaves at the University, none of whom lived in the student rooms but many of whom were housed in basement rooms of pavilions or outbuildings. Are you proposing we write an article about specific notable slaves at the University of Virginia, or about slavery at the University in general? Clarification about the intent of your comment would be appreciated. -Tjarrett (talk) 00:52, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the help with Cyclone Ian it is appreciated. In case you were wondering the sources for the Meteorological history can usually be found in the logs on the season talkpage. I going to try and get a bit more done later though. Regards, Jason Rees (talk) 13:06, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Lihaas, could you explain your reversion of my closure here? Yes, I understand there was some support to post, but there was no way this was going to be posted (definitely no consensus for posting), and reopening the nomination isn't going to lead to more posting. Yes, I know that as nominator, you would like to see this posted, but the later discussion had completely devolved and wasn't leading toward a consensus to post, so that's why I closed the nomination. Regards, Spencer^T♦C 21:44, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
51		Great Online Shopping Festival (talk)						Add sources
54		Foreign relations of Burma (talk)						Add sources
139		Peroni Brewery (talk)						Add sources
4		Libyan–Sudanese conflict (talk)						Add sources
541		Juba (talk)						Add sources
1,333		Education in India (talk)						Add sources
699		Greenville, South Carolina (talk)						Cleanup
16		Syrian reactions to the Syrian Civil War (talk)						Cleanup
115		Papal name (talk)						Cleanup
18		South Sudan–Uganda relations (talk)						Expand
212		Sudan – South Sudan Border War (talk)						Expand
150		Societal attitudes toward homosexuality (talk)						Expand
337		India Against Corruption (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
661		Lord's Resistance Army (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
138		Al-Qaeda insurgency in Yemen (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
133		Chinese paper cutting (talk)						Merge
75		Sudanese nomadic conflicts (talk)						Merge
336		2011 Indian anti-corruption movement (talk)						Merge
90		Sectarianism and minorities in the Syrian Civil War (talk)						Wikify
129		Abyei (talk)						Wikify
915		Meera Sanyal (talk)						Wikify
3		Philip Akot Akok Kiir (talk)						Orphan
1		Brotherhood Without Violence (talk)						Orphan
1		Ann Itto Leonardo (talk)						Orphan
14		Bilal Ag Acherif (talk)						Stub
44		Louise Mushikiwabo (talk)						Stub
889		Brick Mansions (talk)						Stub
6		Information Control Corporation (talk)						Stub
211		Barrel bomb (talk)						Stub
17		Ron Galperin (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Southern Sudan Beverages Limited (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Jinja and Wau

Bangladeshi general election, 2014 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jamaat-e-Islami

Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2013 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to FDI

White Bull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Native American

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:07, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

picced and ticked Victuallers (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

On 20 January 2014, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Southern Sudan Beverages Limited, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that White Bull is South Sudan's first beer brand? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Southern Sudan Beverages Limited. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- John Reaves 00:03, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I will have to disagree with your move of Delhi Cantt to Delhi Cantoment. Commonly used is Delhi Cantt not Delhi Cantonment. I have revereted your related edits. Thanks, Shyam ^(T/C) 10:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

I have already mentioned the reasons for Delhi Cantt. CPI (M-L) and CPI (M-L) (L) are different parties, if you don't know. Thanks, Shyam ^(T/C) 11:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Check 2001 Parties list] for your clarification on CPI(M-L)(L). Thanks, Shyam ^(T/C) 13:16, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

You may check your own talk page before reverting. On Delhi Cantt, check the talk page of Delhi Cantt constituency talk page where you originally left the comment. Thanks, Shyam ^(T/C) 18:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Check my talk page on the party issue. Thanks, Shyam ^(T/C) 19:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

On this page, a user is obviously carrying disruptive editing, by calling my edits as "Vandalism", while himself indulged with WP:Forking, have a look at recent changes, page has similar issue like Widow had previously. Bladesmulti (talk) 15:19, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

—David Levy 15:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Honestly, if you'd bother to actually read before sending semi-legible, disjointed chastisements around, you might actually see that I have provided a source for all the information. Therequiembellishere (talk) 05:57, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

As to the Bangui mayoralty, it has no business being in the infobox as she wasn't well known for this 8-month role she had in this post after being appointed to it without a known date or a firm knowledge of her predecessor, let alone links to any of these variables (the office or the predecessor). It's in the prose of the article with the most information we can decidedly say we have available to us (after some considerable research on my part attempting to answer these) and that is enough for the encyclopedic purposes of the article. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

It's be great if you communicated in sentences and, again, bothered to read the article. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:03, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I just gave you an extended rational so I'm not really inclined to trudge into that again. I'm very much opposed to inundating readers with CLUTTER under the guise of giving them all the information as if all the information is weighed evenly in the person's Bio. Also, the refs belong at the end of the sentence, not clumsily in the middle of every piece of information its attesting to source, so Ill be placing that back where it was and replacing the useless France 24 article that provides none of it. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:09, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

"La maire de Bangui n'est affiliée à aucun grand parti politique." Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I've already explained that, if you'd read above. The France 24 article provides no new information while the Jeune Afrique article supports the entire sentence regardless. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:20, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Sure, that seems fine. I'm going to sleep now. Sorry for the testiness. Therequiembellishere (talk) 06:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thai general election, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In absentia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Be warned that I will not tolerate political interference with this article. Every factual assertion I have made in the article is properly referenced. Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 09:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes. For example, here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-25811250, that she was born in Chad. But until 1960 wasn't Chad, only French Equatorial Africa (1910-1958) and than Union of Central African Republics (until 1960). Also here: http://www.globalblackhistory.com/2014/01/catherine-samba-panza-interim-president-car.html and here: http://www.newtimes.co.rw/news/index.php?i=15611&a=73951. Sincerely, --Noel baran (talk) 10:51, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Campaign poster during the That general election, 2014.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:25, 25 January 2014 (UTC)