User talk:Jonas Bjerkelund

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent, significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zero Gravity Pump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonas Bjerkelund. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Pump, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Pump, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the owner of the page, but the Patent office is a reliable source. I should be allowed to add reliable information. I can add the WIPO entry for this technology. I believe there is a demo of this pump somewhere. What do I need to include for it to be "reliable"?? Jonas Bjerkelund (talk) 13:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is needed is sources that demonstrate that such a pump is in use. Wikipedia is not interested in new inventions. It is only interested in technologies and processes that work and are used in the real world which have been discussed by independent and reliable sources (RSs). If it were not so, Wikipedia would be filled with thousands of recently patented processes and inventions. But it isn't because as they appear they are removed.

Whatever the merits of your addition, there is a policy in Wikipedia that once an edit has been reverted it should not be reintroduced without first agreeing a consensus on the Article talk page (see WP:BRD) If this is not followed your edits may be viewed as edit warring which may result in a block.

As noted above, I also have real concerns that you are not independent of the subject of these additions and the Draft article that you have created. All of this suggests that you are either the author of this patent or an agent of the author. Can you please confirm your relationship with this topic before making any further edits. Editing with an undeclared conflict of interest can lead to a permanent ban from editing on Wikipedia.

I would strongly suggest that you now revert your most recent addition and start the appropriate discussion on the article talk page. If this does not happen, I may make the reversion myself and post a note of the incident to the appropriate noticeboard for admins to take whatever action they deem appropriate.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   13:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jonas Bjerkelund. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zero Gravity Pump, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]