User talk:WikiOriginal-9

Archives

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025

Top 10	Top 10 Medical Editor Barnstar 2024
	You were one of the top medical editors on English in 2024. Thank you for your hard work! —Mvolz (talk) 15:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm one of the top ten with only 2,992 edits? That seems low. Although Doc James' last 500 edits only go back to June so I guess it is right. I suppose these 2,992 edits are from when I created the physician articles from the DNB. I'll take it! Thanks! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HAPPY 2025, WO-9!!

P.S. I'm looking for a primary physician ... congrats! ;) All the best, John. Bringingthewood (talk) 21:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks BTW. I'm afraid I can't help with that though, lol. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:10, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. But you can help by sticking around. Thanks for all that you say and do! John. Bringingthewood (talk) 22:20, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going anywhere. Thanks! ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:34, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Matt Bushman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:08, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Matt Bushman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Matt Bushman and Talk:Matt Bushman/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 22:24, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Matt Bushman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Matt Bushman for comments about the article, and Talk:Matt Bushman/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The New Page Reviewer's NPP Barnstar Award
		This award is given in recognition to WikiOriginal-9 for conducting 242 article reviews in 2024. Thank you so much for all your excellent work. Keep it up! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now in the, in the[1] —Bagumba (talk) 13:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, lol. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And dont forget that this guy played professionally. —Bagumba (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

loll ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But I suppose some could play unprofessionally.[2] —Bagumba (talk) 12:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like our good friend Jweiss11 is the culprit. Probably just a brain fart. lol ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance you can check Green Bay Packers all-time roster and see if I missed anyone from 2024. See if the numbers match up? I think I have 1,853, while PFR has 1,856. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 20:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll check them all in a month or two once the playoffs are over. I might take a look sooner at the Packer list though. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome! I appreciate it :) « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:39, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Gonzo fan2007: I count 1,855 on your list (minus Joe Fortunato), so it looks right. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:59, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:03, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @WikiOriginal-9,

It is our pleasure to invite you to join a study at the University of Minnesota! The objective of the study is to understand how large language models (LLMs) impact the collaborative knowledge production process, by investigating knowledge contributors’ interactions with LLMs in practice.

If you have used LLMs (e.g., GPT, Llama, Claude...) in the process of contributing to Wikipedia (eg. grammar check, finding resources, writing scripts...), we’d love to join the study! You will be engaging in a 45-60 min interview, talking and reflecting about your experience with Wikipedia and your perception/usage of LLMs in Wikipedia. Your valuable input will not only help us understand practical ways to incorporate LLMs into the knowledge production process, but also help us generate guardrails about these practices. All participation would be anonymous.

In addition, if you know any editor who may have used LLMs during their edits, we highly appreciate it if you could share their contact with us, as we can reach out to them.

To learn more, please feel free to start a chat with me in email or take a look at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:How_LLMs_impact_knowledge_production_processes or direcly sign up: https://umn.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bqIjhNRg9Zqsuvs

Thank you so much for your time and consideration!

All the best, LLMs and knowledge production Research Team Phoebezz22 (talk) 23:48, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jarriel King you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ReturnDuane -- ReturnDuane (talk) 17:06, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tricia Bader Binford you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 21:25, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tricia Bader Binford you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tricia Bader Binford and Talk:Tricia Bader Binford/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:01, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tricia Bader Binford you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tricia Bader Binford for comments about the article, and Talk:Tricia Bader Binford/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 08:02, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jarriel King you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Jarriel King and Talk:Jarriel King/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ReturnDuane -- ReturnDuane (talk) 13:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,455 views (704.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:29, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:04, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jarriel King you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Jarriel King for comments about the article, and Talk:Jarriel King/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ReturnDuane -- ReturnDuane (talk) 10:45, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WO9, I am on a spell of creating myself some subpages/sandboxes to help me with some articles I want to work on to keep in a more concise place. Are there rules or limitations that you are aware of regarding the creation of these pages? I do not want to cause grief for anyone if I make a bunch of user subpages for myself. I tried to look for information and I could not find anything. Red Director (talk) 15:57, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No, there aren't any limits. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:36, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Page histories come in handy as well. Red Director (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you maybe would like this. Check this link: [3]

I think this the only article I have had a history like this for this lone (one edit a year lol). Red Director (talk) 19:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How'd you figure that out? Just by chance? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I use Quarry to parse my edits over timeframes and I had some old files downloaded from a while back. Plugged them into excel and found a standard deviation tool to see articles by year and that guy showed up with a bunch of 1's on different years. Red Director (talk) 21:52, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh cool. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trisha Stafford-Odom you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 21:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emmett Barrett is my father. Eugene Francis Barrett was my uncle. That's why I corrected to his proper name. If you need more information on them let me know. REBarrett (talk) 03:11, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:05, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hilarious. Well done. Cielquiparle (talk) 19:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haha. Thank you very much. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. Thanks for the chuckle. Cbl62 (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trisha Stafford-Odom you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Trisha Stafford-Odom and Talk:Trisha Stafford-Odom/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 01:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trisha Stafford-Odom you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trisha Stafford-Odom for comments about the article, and Talk:Trisha Stafford-Odom/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 01:43, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Seems your adding "professional" was removed, while adding "current" (we discussed back at User_talk:Bagumba/Archive_36#Coaches). I now go back to the thousands of remaining "former American" players. —Bagumba (talk) 12:35, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

People can never agree on these leads. It's a chore to keep arguing about this with everyone, lol. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:05, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I must say, I thought my computer broke, I couldn't find the two messages. Then me and Mr. Bacardi realized that someone may have deleted a vandal. I saw the first sentence and was going to thank him and respond. Wow. I've been retired for five years and rarely come here before 4PM. I guess I could have more edits if I wasn't so lazy, lol. Thanks for looking out! P.S. The BTW name came from 'a pass rusher putting the hurt on a quarterback'. I was a LaMarr Woodley fan also. P.S. No real wood ... I live in the Bronx, no fireplace. John. Bringingthewood (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking about leaving that troll there for you so you could have some fun with him but decided to just revert it since you usually delete your messages anyway, lol. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:36, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

HA! Shame on you for wanting me to feed the troll. Honestly, I almost had some fun after I realized what happened. I'll leave it alone for now, these types usually stick around. They will use up a lot of rope, while I sit here cleaning Charlene and smoking my cigar. ==== This is what I had on my WikiAnswers page years ago: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bring_the_wood. I always had to explain the name. Regards, John. Bringingthewood (talk) 00:56, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"They will use up a lot of rope" Very true. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 00:59, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I stand corrected .. not much at all. Muhammad Ali. Bringingthewood (talk) 01:10, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hah. At least he started a discussion. We'll see what happens... ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:15, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We will at that. Truthfully, I never understood the reasoning behind lower case. But when I did 'birthplace' and now 'thenickname', when someone gripes, things come to a halt. Not good. The Wikipedia machine has WP: and MOS: for a reason .. and like the words in Platoon, "When the machine breaks down, we break down". Like you said, we'll see. John. Bringingthewood (talk) 01:25, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think the majority agreed with you about birthplace. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 01:31, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you had a camera hidden here you would see a person jumping up and down for joy in the Bronx!! I'll take that. :) Bringingthewood (talk) 01:39, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That was a good one! Your ears must have been ringing, I was thinking of doing just that knowing you'd see it. But I was born in Manhattan. A hospital stay isn't lead worthy, lol. Bringingthewood (talk) 05:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have an infobox though so we need to WP:PRESERVE it, lol. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 05:59, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LOL! I also had to look at the Bronx article to see if I could have the T in caps. It reads: The Bronx is referred to with the definite article as "the Bronx" or "The Bronx", both legally and colloquially. (I didn't want to be the one using all that rope up). Bringingthewood (talk) 06:03, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're pretty fast at reverting. Is anyone going to block this guy? lol ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 06:25, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now I feel bad. I think on the Muhammad Ali page, the editor you deleted for me is related to Goat. If you see Goat's page, I'm part of the mafia. You should be there also. I remember you being a Wiki-Goombah at one time. Just saying. Bringingthewood (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is a little odd. I'm not 100% sure if they're the same person or not though... ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:55, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah .. I went with Tony Soprano and Wikipedia Mafia, lol. I'll let you enjoy your weekend. Maybe a vandal will show up later ... and we'll see the return of "WIKIORIGINAL-9 aka the KILLER PORCUPINE" See you later. Regards, Chowderhead. Bringingthewood (talk) 00:13, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]