User talk:Darz kkg

Welcome!

Hello, Darz kkg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  Mak (talk) 15:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 02:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Would you like to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Myanmar (Burma)? If so, please add your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Myanmar (Burma)/Members. Thanks. --Hintha 02:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Comrade. I had accepted your invitation and joined Myanmar Wikiproject. Darz kkg 16:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you are referring too. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:37, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. No problem. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 02:54, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome. If you are interested in helping to fight vandalism yourself, check out WP:VANDAL for some ideas, and also the Recent Changes Patrol is always looking for help. Oh, and BTW, you left your comment on my user page. In the future, you want to be sure to leave the comment on a user's talk page by clicking on the discussion tab. If you ever need anymore more help at all, just leave a note on my talk page. Happy editing! --Jayron32|talk|contribs 04:38, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please kindly provide verifiable facts regarding the information in the said article? I have remove information that are not in accordance with Wikipedia policy. This is not a vandalism.

Please do not add unverifiable information to Wikipedia, as you did to Islam in Myanmar. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not add unverifiable information to Wikipedia, as you did to Burmese Indians. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Okkar 16:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OKKAR if you are ignorant or blinded with racism and try to vandalize without searching for the truth is your problem. I had seen your uncalled for behaviour with the quarrel with other Wiki editors. If you are the true Okkar writting notoriously in Burmese mainstream media, you could be even guilty with the crimes of Genocide at ICC.Darz kkg 01:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Burmese Indians. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Thank you.

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Islam in Myanmar. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Thank you.

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Myanmar Muslims. Please do not attempt to put misinformation into Wikipedia to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with varying results. Most hoaxes are marked for deletion within a few hours after they are created. Some Wikipedians suspect that the majority of hoaxes here are attempts to test the system. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Thank you.

Please do not make racist comments towards other users, as you did at Burmese Indians. Wikipedia has a strict 'no personal attacks' policy. Users who continue to be racist towards other users will be blocked.

Your comments and statements regarding me can be considered as personal attacks. Please adhere to Wikipedia policy, be civil and polite or I will have to report you for personal attacks and vandalism. As for the articles, please do not include "unverifiable facts". Please remember all Encyclopedic content must be verifiable. If you would like to dispute, please provide "verifiable facts" links. Okkar 01:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide [[1]] Approved and proposed for signature and ratification or accession by General Assembly resolution 260 A (III) of 9 December 1948 entry into force 12 January 1951, in accordance with article XIII Article 1 The Contracting Parties confirm that genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they undertake to prevent and to punish. Article 3 The following acts shall be punishable: (a) Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d ) Attempt to commit genocide; (e) Complicity in genocide. Article 4 Persons committing genocide or any of the other acts enumerated in article III shall be punished, whether they are constitutionally responsible rulers, public officials or private individuals. Article 9 Disputes between the Contracting Parties relating to the interpretation, application or fulfilment of the present Convention, including those relating to the responsibility of a State for genocide or for any of the other acts enumerated in article III, shall be submitted to the International Court of Justice at the request of any of the parties to the dispute. Eight Stages of Genocide [[2]] Stage 2. Symbolization. Characteristics = "When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups..." NLD, Opposition, Rebels, Ethnic Minorities as Non Barmans, Muslims, Christians, Chinese, even Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and Kha Maut is symbolized for hatred and annihilation. Stage 4. Organization Characteristics = Organization "Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, though sometimes informally. Special army units or militias are often trained and armed..." or by terrorist groups. Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. Plans are made for genocidal killings. Stage 5. Polarization "Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda..." SPDC’s bill boards around the country, SPDC various media, pamphlets speeches are full with this hate propaganda. Extremists drive the groups apart. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center Stage 6. Identification "Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity..." This is very obvious with the SPDC, even no need to elaborate further. Death lists are drawn up. Members of victim groups are forced to wear identifying symbols. They are often segregated into ghettoes, forced into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. "At this stage, a Genocide Alert must be called... “Journalists like Okkar, who supported the Myanmar Military leaders with their writtings joining the propaganda warfare to discriminate, to do ethnic cleansing are also guilty and punishable at ICC. Be careful Okkar. Darz kkg 02:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits removed content from your talk page. Please note, such removal is frowned upon by the community and could be considered vandalism.

• If you disagree with someone, feel free to reply to their comment(s) on your talk page, there is no real neccessity to erase comments.
• Removal of administrative notices would also classify as vandalism, please do not repeat that.

Regards, xC | ☎ 12:46, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okkar had removed my tags about his vandilism FIRST. Please kindly educate him.Darz kkg 12:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have not removed anything from my talk page - please feel free to investigate. Okkar 13:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

This is your last warning. If you continue to make personal attacks, you will be blocked for disruption. Ian Cairns 12:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide the proof of where I did insult you? Okkar 13:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation to Wiki editors about my outburst with Okkar

Yesterday I was so angry and I decided to cool down, stop writing and reading the Wiki according to Wiki’s advice. I will read the others’ new postings only after posting my point of view with this letter.

I have to admit that I could not prove beyond the reasonable doubt that Wiki Okkar is the same person with the Myanmar Military Intelligence planted notorious writer, Maung Okkar, who is actively doing the dirty propaganda warfare in various Myanmar Media.

If I am wrong, please kindly accept my sincerely wish to apologize Wiki Okkar and Wiki editors.

First, the facts I wrote in my three articles about Muslims in Myanmar, Islam in Myanmar, Burmese Indians and Panthays are not taken out from thin air or just my creations. You could see that I had put in a lot of references. Some references may be weak in some of your eyes but as I had failed to record up to the page level but I am not bluffing. Later I searched back and had corrected the references up to the pages, paragraphs and lines. But with the latest development, I should not waste my time anymore as there is a danger of erasing all of them.

Okkar had blanked earlier two paragraphs. As I could not prove with references, I just totally keep quiet.

1.Maha Bandoola was written with the hearsay evidence. Therefore, I was wrong. 2.Actually Padeik Kara was not wrong at all as I had copied most of the acts from the Glass Palace Chronicle. I just mentioned there that he was an Indian which is known by most of the Burmese population. Okkar blanked that and remarked, as that was the folktale only. Although I could argue, I avoid any protest to get peace of mind.

Even one of the Wiki editors, a pastor came in and erased the “Holy” word in front of the Koran. Holy word is not reserved for Christians only but other religions have the right to use but I just ignored to avoid a conflict.

Regarding U Thant’s Mixed Indian blooded status.

I had read that article in the Myanmar Government’s Working People Newspaper. As I was not interested in that at that time, I failed to note down the exact date. Never mind that may be the lie and propaganda warfare of the Myanmar Military Government to disgrace U Thant. U Thant’s descendents may be upset with my repeat mentioning of this. You all could erase that paragraph. Okkar acused me as a lie. I may be wrong because of the lies in the Military Government’s Newspaper to tarnish U Thant’s name but I am not bluffing.

The worse mistake of Okkar was blanking the whole paragraph in the Notable Muslims in history. I found back that book that I referred and is in front of me. The book is in Burmese.

The name of the book is, “Twentieth Anniversary Special Edition of Islam Damma Beikman.” On the page, 90 to page 131 there are three topics _

1.Myanmar Pyi and Islamic religion.
2.Islamic religion and Bama Literature.
3.Myanmar’s Culture from Islamic History.

These are the reprint of the records of the lectures given by Pathi U Ko Lay in 1973. Some of my facts are taken from that book’s page 90-112.

The page Okkar erased as lies is from page 109,110 and 111.

After Okkar accused me of lies and erase that paragraph, I reverted as vandalism and put vandalism tags in his user talk page. He erased all the tags from his user page. And counter put many tags insulting and accusing of unverifiable facts.

Anyway, I hereby wish to apologize all the Wiki editors including Okkar (if he really has no hidden agenda to sabotage the Islam related articles) for

1.my outburst and anger
2.personal attacks on Okkar
3.removing the unwanted tags and posting in my talk page and articles

I hereby wish to request the followings from the Wiki editors_

1.To edit my three articles for the spelling, grammar, style etc
2.As these are quite long, to make the gist without simply erase the facts
3.Especially to change the style so that these are written with the neutral view according to he Wiki standards, as I had written from our Muslim point of view as the victims of atrocities committed by the successive Military leaders.

Although I signed up as the members of the WikiMyamar and WikiIslam, I decided to stay away from Wiki for at least three months. I trust that there are enough just and fair-minded Wiki editors to protect my articles from vandalism.

Last request is to remove the tags accusing of unverifiable contents. This is not correct and a great insult to me and my articles. May be we need mediators. With regards --Darz kkg 04:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your apology seems sincere Darz kkg, and I'm sure the community approves of you doing your best to calm down. I assure you, anything you say which is backed up with references will be looked at and discussed. As long as all editors are civil, there is no need for any fighting.

I'll have a look at the formatting, spelling, etc as soon as I can.

In the meanwhile, if you indeed are going to be offline for sometime, I'll do my best to represent your concerns. However, its difficult for me to promise anything, I'm just a random editor trying to do a good deed, I have no scholarly claims on the history of Myanmar.

I trust you provided references on the talk pages where the discussions took place? Then I'm sure we could find the sources for said content. However if we fail to find refs, then it would have o be removed as per policy. Again, as an individual, I can offer no promises, but I'm sure with the help of WikiMyanmar and WikiIslam we would be able to work out the neutral point of view.

Hoping you continue contributing in the spirit of WP,

Regards, xC | ☎ 05:20, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have said it before and will say it again - it is not racist to question the accuracy of a particular article, especially it has been written in a form of aggressively promoting particular POV - in this case, excessive Islamisation of Burmese history. In other word, you have written the article to support particular POV. This is entirely against Wikipedia Policy. Also, as other editors have pointed out to you in talke pages of Talk:Burmese Indians and Talk:Islam in Myanmar that you have misinterpreted the facts from Glass Palace Chronocle, which you based many of the assumptions in the article. You also cited your own, self written article from another website as reference to support your claims regarding "supposed" promises of General Aung San. This again is misrepresenting in order to support particular claims. A lot of the references you provided in the article are either unverifiable, lack supportive information such as ISBN number 'etc., or simply too broad (for example: citing Working People's Daily as reference but no specific dates were given - as such it cannot be verified).

As for the notable muslims, many of whom you listed there are not notable or encyclopedic enough according to Wikipedia guidelines on "notable persons", hence I have removed them, however I have left the prominent ones who are relevant to the article. You must remember that Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia, not a political propaganda platform. You cannot and should not use Wikipedia to lobby, propaganda or raise awareness for particular cause. Therefore it is wrong of you to use Wikipedia article to express your POV and your version of events - in this case, as you have admitted above - against the attrocities committed by successive military leaders. While this maybe of relevant for many other propaganda and campaign websites, such as those you have quoted in external link section of the article, as far as Wikipedia concern - it is inappropiate as Wikipedia is a neutral body and you can/should only present facts that are verifiable. If in doubt, please read and digest Verifiability and "What Wikipedia is NOT". I am sure Amnesty International or other human rights website may welcome your version of the article, but as for Wikipedia, it is entirely against it's unbias and neutral policy.

Last but not least, it is not an insult to anyone to remove informations, paragraphs, sentences from an article with "unverifiable content" tags "if" the references provided there are not verifiable - for example: Press release from Foreign Office of Bangladesh you quoted appear to be of non-existance. I do hope that you understand what wikipedia really stand for and that you would contribute to wikipedia in future according to it's policies. Also please do not make up lies about me that I have erased contents from my talk page. I have not done so. However, you on the other hand left messages in various different places in my talk page. I welcome anyone to read my talk page history and find out whether or not i have deleted anything from my talk pages at all. Please remember everything that is written in Wikipedia is recorded and can be brought back by history. Anyone who is reading the historical log of your talk page will see that I have neither insulted you or attacked you in anyway. I simply pointed out to you that you should not accuse me of "racist" for questioning the factual accuracy of your articles. Okkar 19:52, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Myanmar Indian Muslims, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myanmar Indian Muslims and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your racial attack and unfounded accusations, if you carried on, you will be block again. Okkar 17:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for a week due to your disruption of project pages, particularly WP:AIV and WP:LTA directed at a single user. None of the pages you wrote on was the proper forum for your issue, and you posted the same message across several pages. Please do not repeat your actions in the future.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 09:49, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I am not bragging, I had gathered facts from about 150 books for the Muslims in Burma/Myanmar articles in about twenty years. However, as I failed to record properly the source of each information, my first posting in the Wiki was labeled or tagged to be deleted quickly. In addition, it was accused as easy entry or cut and paste article.

Although Wiki editors and administrators are 100% right in their decision but they should made a new ruling to go slow and give some time to the new comers like me. In addition, most of the Wiki editors are busy and made quick but sometimes wrong decisions. Just look at the two blocks on me. Instead of trying to mediate, negotiate, or actually trying to understand the fuss, just made a quick decision in haste. Nevertheless, I must admit that I also have to take the blame as I could not calmly watch my articles butchered and had made a rude fight.

As I could not keep all the reference books with me all the time or have leisure to review all of them immediately, I just go through my article and put the references, on estimation only. At least it works to prevent them from deletion by overenthusiastic editors. I am not telling that they are wrong. They are just doing their jobs according to the Wiki rules and regulations. I was to take the blame for that blunder but I had committed in good faith. And Wiki administrators should review those strict rules of deleting the articles. Just give us some more time.

Please read the following two stubs_

1. Myanmar ( Burmese ) Democracy and Human Rights online media.
2. Talk:Myanmar ( Burmese ) Democracy and Human Rights online media

Now, I got hold of some books back (some of my books were left behind in Burma, some borrowed by friends, some from the various university libraries) and I had successfully put in the citations.

It is a blessing in disguise that my articles look original but supported by references. It do not looked as if easy entry, copied from others. For example, as I had stated, my “Anti-Indian Riots” earlier paragraphs' basic facts are taken from Maurice Collis' "Trials in Burma". I lost the book, maybe someone borrowed and never give back) so I could not give the references up to the page level. But I managed to put the citations from "The Muslims of Burma” A study of a minority Group, by Moshe Yegar. At least I could prove that the facts are not my POV only nor my imiginatory fictions only but other third party, a respectable Israel Diplomet, PhD holder’s MSc thesis book. Actually all the citations and references in all my articles are just searched and given.

So, as my three articles below

1. Islam in Myanmar
2. Burmese Indians and
3. Panthay

are supported or cited with appropriate references from

1. Moshe Yegar’s "The Muslims of Burma”
2. The Glass Palace Chronicle of the Kings of Burma, translated by Pe Maung Tin and G.H.Luce, Burma Research Society,
3. History Professor U Maung Maung Lay’s The Emergence Of The Panthay Community At Mandalay, published in the “Essays given to Than Tun on his 75th birthday” in the book, “Studies in Myanmar History” volume 1,.
4. “Twentieth Anniversary Special Edition of Islam Damma Beikman.” Myanmar Pyi and Islamic religion.The reprint of the records of the lectures given by Pathi U Ko Lay in 1973.
5. Facts about Anti-Indian Riots are published in_
   

a.Human Rights Watch
b.Country Reports on Human Rights Practices , Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, by US States Department
c.Amnesty International
d.Office of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
e.US Department of State, International Religious Freedom Report
f.UK Conservatives’ Human Rights
g.The Persecution of Muslims in Burma by Karen Human Rights Group
h.Butkaew, Samart. "Burmese Indians: The Forgotten Lives", Burma Issues.

The facts I wrote are not my POV only but the POV of multiple above sources. Other Wiki editors could help edit to tone down the style and to look more neutral. But as the successive Myanmar Military rulers had brain washed the Burmese citizens that all Muslims are mixed blooded and recent migrants not worth issuing the citizenship of Myanmar, at least my articles could prove that although there may be some illegal immigrants, most of us are staying for few generations in Myanmar as citizens.

I searched these facts to publish a book on Muslims in Burma/Myanmar. Now I had contributed free of charge to Wiki all of my research for twenty years. Anyway thank you Wiki, Wiki Administrators, Wiki Editors for all the edits, guidance, help preventing vandalism etc. I hereby wish to mention my special thanks to_

1. Hintha
2. Kyaw2003
3. User:Cgilbert76
4. Chris
5. Bojokemujee
6. and all the other editors who had edited my articles.
7. I hereby request Okkar to come back to Wiki and continue to contribute in Wiki . Although we have difference in opinions, I appreciate his ability and skills.

I wish to assure Kyaw2003 and others that I never meant to insult my fellow Buddhist brothers nor I wish to incite the racial hatred or revenge by writing these articles. But we all need to know _

1. the origin, roots or ancestors of Burmese Muslims.
2. the root causes of racial riots.

to avoid the further conflicts.

Actually any one with vested interest could start racial riots; Government, part of the Government who wish to discredit the top leaders and wish to perform a coup (like Myanmar Military Intelligent wing under General Khin Nyunt) or even the opposition.

I am not an Islamic radical. Just look at my Darz kkg. I had contributed a lot of useful non Islamic articles for our country.

But if you care to read the following articles, you could understand what the Muslims in Burma want.

1. United We Stand, Divided We Lose [3]
2. We are all Burmese in our heart [4]
3. We also Love Burma, part 1 (Burmese)[5]
4. We also Love Burma, part 2 (Burmese) [6]
5. Complaining of unfair attitude On Religious Minorities including Muslims [7]
6. Opening Heart on Equal Rights for All Ethnic Groups [8]

So please may you kindly allow me to remove the folloing tags from my articles_
You all are free to edit as you like on those articles.

Thank you all.--Darz kkg 10:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ko Kyaw2003, I hope you have heard the following fable, as told by W. Chafe. There was once a Wolf, who saw a Lamb drinking at a river and wanted an excuse to eat it. For that purpose, even though he himself was upstream, he accused the Lamb of stirring up the water and keeping him from drinking... To understand this, one must realize that the Wolf is lying! To understand the key conjunctive "even though" one must realize that contamination never flows upstream. I hope you would not be foolish enough to stress to put the alleged plight of minority whites in Apartheid article in Wiki. And I hope you would not even think about the unjustifiable lame excuses of alleged Muslim grieviences leading to September 11, 2001 attacksarticles. Nor any one would accept to put in the excuses given by Nazi’s for committing the Holocaust article in Wikipedia. Neutral POV in those three cases must be applied in my articles. Why are you stubbornly hold that it is my POV only when I had cited many notable authorities in this field supporting my POV which is correct. This is the POV of a notable Israel Diplomat Dr Moshe Yega, Glass Palace Chronicle and many International Groups including UN and US.

Yes Ko Kyaw, some lamb may fight back. Some coloured Africans may have done some revenge on whites and some Jews may have done injustices on Aryan Nazi Germans.

In addition, yes Ko Kyaw, I had seen the photos of the predators; wolves, dogs, tigers giving breast feedings to the lambs etc. Moreover, not all Germans are bad and many of them had helped a lot of Jews. The same thing is true for whites. There are far more better whites than a small minority whites exploiting during the Apartheid period. And I even had wrote in my article about the good Buddhist monks (you may be surprized, even if any drunkard make a noisy scene infront of my clinic, few Buddhist monks used to pull them and protect me although they were not aiming to me but fight among themselves. Just read my article Myanmar Muslim activists in Wiki_ Especially Dr Kyaw Nyein had a very good relation with the very powerful and famous Mandalay Young Buddhist Monks and to some extent successful in countering the agent provocateurs from inciting the anti Muslim sentiments. Because of his request, real monks influential in Mandalay searched and confiscated and destroyed nearly hundred thousand anti-Muslim pamphlets allegedly distributed the Myanmar Military secret agents. Although reported to the authorities, no one was arrested for that crime in a country where many people were arrested, tortured and jailed for printing or photocopying or distributing any anti-government papers or even for distribution of Human right Declaration from UN office. And Ko Kyaw, FYI, I was there together with Dr Kyaw Nyein. When we were surprised and did not know what to do with that truck load of pamphlets during the riots, Sayadaw from Mya Taung Tike even advised us just to destroy them by burning in the monastry field and ordered the young Koyins to help carry and pile up those pamphlets to burn. We brought our Muslim religious leaders including Mandalay division Maulvi to apologize and request the Buddhist Sayadaws. Real monks are much better than hat most of us could imagine. My POV is just accept us as real brothers and sisters to rebuild our beloved country, Burma/Myanmar. Please stop the attack on us in Myanmar and Wiki. Your POV is crystal clear, Ko Kyaw. Although my POV is supported by multiple independent reputable sourses. You are the one who is blinded by bias and Racial Supremist policy. You are the one who started all the fuss. See how you read and interpreted the Pe Maung Tin and G.H.Luce, The Glass Palace Chronicle of the Kings of Burma". You wrote, The name "Nga Yaman Kan" usually means one eyed man in Burmese. You blatantly mis-spelled Nga Ramankan to Nga Yaman Kan. It was a big lie amounting to a crime Ko Kyaw. (Yes it is a varient and many people including me, you could see this in my King Sawlu article, to avoid the racists’ unnecessary attacks.) But do you understand that by purposely miss-spelling Nga Raman Kan’s name from that book as Nga Yaman Kan to trick Wiki editors and trying to subortage the Islam articles could also lead you to the Hague. As we have to learn Forensic Medicine and as we need to give expert evidences in the police cases such as assaults and murders, when we look at the wounds we could most of the time know whether they were the results of self-defense as every body has the right to the self-defense. However, if the victim was just holding a stick, if you use the knife or gun, it is not easy to claim a self-defense. After all, if you pump the whole magazine of bullets into the victim’s chest and head and especially after the victim fell down and could not harm you anymore, your aggressiveness is exposed and after the vicious attack, you could not hide behind the cloak of self-defense. You exposed and use my weakness in references but concealed and lied by misspelling the Nga Ramankan to Nga Yaman Kan and your cohort “Colonel” Okkar put the multiple insulting tags at all my articles. Now I had corrected all the references after I had given more than enough citations for my articles. However, you have given lame excuses to put back the tags. Yes you are right, my articles are not perfect. You are always welcomed to correct the mistakes. And if you care to see, another contributor Bojokemujee had posted most of those atrocities under Military rule. Nevermind you can blame me but please made sure that if you put any of your POV please kindly give irreputable sources and citations. Ko Kyaw, no article or book is perfect for every one. Even Holy books of God, like Bibles, Tri Pidaka, Torah and Koran may be not perfect for the non-believers. I am just a human being. You all need to improve this but not by vandalism or with insults. Ko Kyaw, thank you for suggesting me to have my own blog, or write in the online journals like Burma Digest. TQ, yes, I have done that. Just see my user page. But what are you and Okkar to tell that I am wrong to write these articles in Wiki. First you all tried to kick Muslims out of Myanmar and now, are you all trying to kick out Burmese Muslim articles from Wiki? No way Mr Kyaw. We are here to stay. You all could continue your Genocide attempt on Burmese Muslims in Wiki and so called Myanmar.

Where are the always enthusiastic, overactive Wiki editors and Administrators like: User:Rlevse and Ryūlóng (竜龍) to mediate our dispute? I hereby demand your vote or opinion or mediation regarding those unnecessary tags. You should not come to the scene of a fight, give a haste ‘judgment’ punish the victim and run away. You could cite thousands of Wiki rules and regulations that your judgment is right but it is morally bankrupt and wrong not to look into the root cause of a dispute or try to mediate on that matter.

It is the time to take out most of the insulting tags Ko Kyaw. No need to wait until cows comes back. The vicious multiple repetitive tags show your animosity. Your nasty attacks show the true nature and show that your excuses of self-defense is no more valid. I herby remove the excessive vicious unnecessary tags. Two is enough. Come on Administrators, if you think I am wrong think about this dispute and give decision. I would not remove again. Nevertheless, I cannot accept the aggressors or potential Genocide criminals’ decision to continue desecrate my articles.Darz kkg 06:57, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Moken, please see my comments at Talk:Moken. The main article that I think you need to work on is Islam in Burma. But I suggest that you discuss your edits on the talk page before making them. Also, you seem to have trouble with some nomenclature. Be sure that you thoroughly understand the way that others use terms before making edits. --Bejnar (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• In researching I have found part of the problem. Pashu is just the local name in Kawthaung for people of Malay ancestry. It is also used to describe the mixed Malay-Burmese-Thai patois that many of them speak. Sometimes the word Pashu is also applied to the Moken as they are related to the Malays. An example of usage is the local Kawthaung name for Pterocarpus indicus or pashu-padauk while in English it is sometimes called Malay padauk. Pashu has nothing to do with religion, but that could be confusing since the Malay are more likely to be Muslim than the Burmese or Thai. --Bejnar (talk) 18:06, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TQ very much for the very useful information.--Darz kkg (talk) 13:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TQ again for the information but I am fed up with the way Wikipedia editors treated others who had contributed important facts for the benefit of others. So I am staying away to avoid tensions and arguments.

Proof (or reference for Wiki) = Just look at the tags in my Islam in Burma, Burmese Indians, Panthays or Burmese Chinese Muslim articles. I took those as an insult. You should edit to Wikify those or correct if I am wrong but don’t just insult others like this.

Most of you act like or sound like or look like real professionals.

Then if you all are not sure of Pashu/Moklen why one of the Wiki editors merge my Myanmar Malay Muslims or Malay Muslims in Burma article into the Moken article and then ERASED later?

If there were unacceptable facts or wrong facts, just correct them.

Why it is all right to erase my whole article? Is there any remedy or punishment for those IRRESPONSIBLE WIKI EDITORS?--Darz kkg (talk) 08:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I got some reference while Googling: Pashu of Burma

1/Myanmar (Burma). - Page 166

Robert Reid, Michael Grosberg - 2005 - 404 pages - Preview

Most Kawthoung residents are bilingual in Thai and Burmese. Many residents born and raised in Kawthoung, especially members of the large Muslim community, also speak Pashu, a dialect that mixes the Thai, Malay and Burmese languages. ...

2/Thailand's islands and beaches - Page 277 Joe Bindloss, Wendy Taylor - 2004 - 468 pages -Most residents are bilingual, speaking Thai and Burmese. Many people born and raised around Kawthoung, especially Muslims, also speak Pashu, a dialect that mixes Thai, Malay and Burmese. Nearby islands are inhabited by bands of nomadic ...

3/Thailand - Page 681.Joe Cummings - 2003 - 808 pages Most residents are bilingual, speaking Thai and Burmese. Many people ; born and raised around Kawthoung. especially Muslims, also speak Pashu. a dialect that mixes Thai. Malay and Burmese. Nearby islands are inhabited by bands of ...

4/Voices of Islam in Southeast Asia: a contemporary sourcebook. Greg Fealy, Virginia Matheson Hooker - 2006 - 540. 1 The Major Muslim Communities of Burma Tamil (Cholia) Malay Muslims (Pashu) Bengali Muslims of South Asian ancestry Zerbadee (Burmese-Muslims) Telegu (Corongi) Punjabi Chittagonian between Panthay and Burmese is reportedly common. ...

--Darz kkg (talk) 13:56, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity and religion are two areas that brindle with controversy. If you wish to work on articles about ethnicity and religion, please be very careful. All controversial facts must be cited to reliable sources. It is best if you can cite to neutral publications that are generally available. Academic publications tend to be more reliable than the popular press or websites with a particular point of view. --Bejnar (talk) 23:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

salaam absolutely awsome work rate and material. I created nearly all of islam in china, and muslim chinese martial arts on muslimwiki , (it has now found its way to wikipedia - but vandalised and deleted in many ways). How can i contact you at your wordpress as there are no emails. Alternatively you are more than welcome to use your great expertise at islam in burma at the muslimwiki http://muslimwiki.com/mw/index.php/Islam_in_burma - where your contributions will be most definately welcome. A fan 81.86.211.184 (talk) 23:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC) p.s here is some work i did at http://muslimwiki.com/mw/index.php/Panthay_Rebellion 81.86.211.184 (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Salaam. TQ brother. Sorry for the late reply and accepting the invitation now only. But allow me to use my other pseudonym, San Oo Aung @ Dr Zafar Shah or just San Oo Aung which is the name I adopted in my web page [9] and contribute as the editor of Burma Digest [10].But you need to edit my articles as my English is not good although I have a lot of facts about Burmese Muslims.--Darz kkg (talk) 15:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's really frustrating dealing with touchy political issues. It seems like articles related to Burma are repeatedly flagged POV without any explaination. I'm really sorry to see you go, I will do my best to keep an eye on these pages, though I think your purpsective is valuable to wikipedia. --Kraftlos (talk) 11:32, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, your recent edits or comments on Wikipedia, did not appear to conform with Wikipedia policies and guidelines:

• Wikipedia is not a directory for personal weblogs or advertising: Do not use Wikipedia to push personal or political agenda here. Wikipedia is not the medium for this. Please read and abide our rules at WP:EL and WP:Spam. If you feel very strongly that your edits are suitable for inclusion, bring it up at the article talk page for further discussion. Do note that the community frown upon disruptive editing, and such actions may led to one's account being swiftly blocked like this example next. Please stop, and consider the above guidelines along with the prior messages posted here, if you want to contribute postitively to Wikipedia in the long run. Thank you. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Aldwinteo

TQ for rudely warning me.

Sorry for not able to give time to read Wiki laws.

I congratulate you for NEARLY GETTING the distinction in IT.

I should just continue to stay away from Wiki to avoid this kind of insults.--Darz kkg (talk) 11:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm performing my duty to protect the integrity of this project as well as to prevent u in getting into any potential troubles like those previous cases above. As such, I'm surprised that a bona fide reminder to u earlier was construed as an 'insult'. Based on your reply above, ask yourself honestly, esp one who claimed in his cause to be a proponent of presenting 'hard truths', whether anyone will think that your remarks are 'sincere' in tone or another unwarranted personal attack again? As in the Law of Karma, do sit back and reflect whether your actions or comments to date, has been constructive in terms of your standing in Wikipedia and your credentials, or whether it may incur any unpleasant follow-up action by the community in future? Ironically for all to see, it doesn't inspire confidence that an individual who strongly advocate human rights & fair treatment, doesn't set a higher example in exercising much level-headedness or common decency to fellow human beings here so far. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please note that although wikipedia is an online encyclopedia where everyone can edit and contribute, we also do not welcome combative, disruptive and strongly opinionated editors to disrupt the project's integrity and well-being. You are kindly requested to READ UP on the Welcome section above to avoid running the risk of getting BANNED should you ever feel the need to belittle or direct a personal attack against someone who is only reminding you of something here. Dave1185 (talk) 18:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I understand that Expulsion of Indians from Burma in 1962 has been merged to Burmese Indians. In such case we keep the edit history for GFDL reason under a redirect. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Before making such a personal attack, you should actually look into the article's history. I have reverted many vandalisms from the article. So, if you are looking for Burmese editors or Anti-Rohingya editors, please look elsewhere and find another target. You say you think my "Edits are anti-Rohingya", I challenge you to show an example, or otherwise apologize for lying. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 18:44, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please kindly read back what you write_Most of these people were Bengalis from Bangladesh. --Ragib (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you cook various delicious dishes but add one drop of S***T like this is good/bad enough to ruin all you have done. This one fact is the basic accusation by the Myanmar military rulers to commit all the atrocities on them. By the way, why don't you mobilize the public opinion to accept back the so called Bengalis as Bangladesh citizens. Under the British we all were living in one country. When giving independence, the British need to define a border and some Burmese and Bengalis were caught on the wrong border. The Buddhist Burmese in Bangladesh side were even persuaded by former Myanmar PM General Khin Nyunt. But after tasting the lack of economic activities on this side they decided to go back or migrate to other countries. But Myanmar government has no right to say that they want the land only but could not accept the people staying on their side of the border. This is the basic fact and I hope you should not support them even if there are recent migrants. It is their duty to guard their border or take action but Myanmar military government has no right to go around with the army, surrounded the villages and towns and collect all the relevant documents, burnt them and collectively punish ALL the people.

You may be a good Wiki editor, good intensions and may have done a lot for them but supporting the SPDC with that WRONG statement is bad enough to further damage not only their reputation, legal standing and survival. Just look at BBC and Alj. Eng TV. If you care to read my blog with the title San Oo Aung, you can see that I am campaigning for the support of Muslim countries not only for them but for all the Burmese democracy.

So just look at one fact or one sentence, it may be a truth from your side. Most of the Wiki editors are also grasping their side of view which they claimed to be NPOV, used the Wiki rules that most of the people have no time to learn by heart and attack back aggressively. For the suffering persons, we could not accept the NPOV in every thing. Our world is not a black and white world. There are different grades of greys. Even NPOV of one side may be different if you see from different angles. As there is Islamophobia in Burma and around the world we are hardened to aggressively defend our POV.

TQ, if you want, I am ready to say sorry for hurting you but you owe a sorry not to me but to Rohingyas for calling them Bengalis.--Darz kkg (talk) 04:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are simply being paranoid about the comment. The comment was placed when, in the initial reports published in news media, the boat people were identified as Bangladeshis, without any specific notes about their ethnicities. Considering the fact that 98% of Bangladeshis are Bengalis, I made the comment. However, you go on and start personal attacks based on that comment, and launch the above rant?? Wow!! I see that making personal attacks is not something new for you ... you've done it before and in this case you did it again. I again urge you to lose the personal attacking attitude, and behave. I would also challenge you to prove your earlier comment and above rant against my edits, or otherwise you should apologize. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 05:26, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article Burmese Indians is up for GA Review. Since, I see you had worked on it before, can you please help now? Vinay84 (talk) 08:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. Ari (talk) 14:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: talk:Kyar Ba Nyein. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ari (talk) 06:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as talk:Kyar Ba Nyein are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Ari (talk) 06:15, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Mya Aye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 22:00, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I fight back, the group of Wiki editors would come and punish me. If punish also no much problem. I am staying away from wiki (i.e. contributions , except for taking references) for a long time. Mya Aye IS A MUSLIM. So people are attacking him esp when his daughter recently became popular, attacking military government of Myanmar. They renewed attacking him because of his daughter's activities like attacking General Aung San because of daughter Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. But if Mya Aye, popular student leader in jail is not important, GO AND TELL NOBLE COMITTEE not to be foolish to give the Noble Peace prize to a Chinese in jail. May be we all campaign to delete all the biography from Wiki because we need to keep the deletion of Mya Aye as a bench mark. TQ, NOW PUNISH ME. WELCOME. Darz kkg (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC) (Note: I wrote in anger, never edit back. There may be a lot of errors which I don't CARE.Darz kkg (talk) 06:32, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 12:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why if someone hijack my articles to merge, my edit history disappeared in the new edit history? This is happening in dozens of my articles.We give our contributions FOC to Wiki but why our efforts were deleted by NEW COMERS? Readers could not see our efforts. Please read the, [period of ancient Burma], (Redirected from my Early history of Burma)

SEE, MY NAME IS GONE HERE_

1. (cur | prev) 10:42, January 23, 2011 Hmains (talk | contribs) m (31,633 bytes) (copyedit, MOS and or AWB general fixes using AWB) (undo)
2. (cur | prev) 19:48, January 18, 2011 Dmitri Lytov (talk | contribs) (31,643 bytes) (→Through China) (undo)
3. (cur | prev) 21:53, January 12, 2011 Soewinhan (talk | contribs) (31,639 bytes) (Replaced with more accurate image (Human doesn't have boats to cross the ocean, and even Ice age didn't reach equator. The image is wrong on that ground)) (undo)
4. (cur | prev) 21:26, January 12, 2011 Soewinhan (talk | contribs) m (31,627 bytes) (moved Prehistory of Burma to Migration period of ancient Burma: it's primarily deal with migrations; I'll write about prehistory tomorrow) (undo)
5. (cur | prev) 18:28, January 12, 2011 Soewinhan (talk | contribs) (31,627 bytes) (→Through India: rmv wrong map, lower burma was under Thaton kingdom) (undo)
6. (cur | prev) 08:51, January 9, 2011 Hybernator (talk | contribs) (31,723 bytes) (see discussion) (undo)
7. (cur | prev) 07:52, January 9, 2011 Soewinhan (talk | contribs) m (31,838 bytes) (merger) (undo)
8. (cur | prev) 18:45, January 2, 2011 Soewinhan (talk | contribs) (31,724 bytes) (undo)
9. (cur | prev) 18:42, January 2, 2011 Soewinhan (talk | contribs) (38 bytes) (moved Prehistory of Burma to Early history of Myanmar)

At the [history of Migration period of ancient Burma]

Please look at my actual efforts for this article_[contributionsFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia]

1. 12:34, January 22, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Out of Africa: Describing the similar DNA between Burma and India)
2. 12:28, January 22, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (Adding discription into caption)
3. 12:21, January 22, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Description put as caption)
4. 12:16, January 22, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Removing the cheriot spread picture which is not very relevant)
5. 21:58, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) m Basic Education High School No. 9 Mandalay ‎ (Adjusting space)
6. 21:33, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) m Ramayana ‎ (Adding the Burmese version of Ramayana)
7. 20:58, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (Adjusting map size)
8. 20:55, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Changing place of map downwards)
9. 20:52, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Out of Africa: Shifting the place of map)

20:49, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Adjusting the place of map) 20:48, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Adjusting the size of map) 18:40, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Forefathers of Bamars: Adding the Geography of Himalaya that hindered the communicating between China and India) 17:37, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Added Tibet Plateau where the direction of rivers and valleys lead to migration downwards) 15:23, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Earliest migrants amongst Myanmars: Adding the ancient trade routes through Thaton/Pegu/Bago) 13:52, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (Inserting the Human spreading over history pic) 11:13, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Geography that facilitated the migration of Tibeto-Burman, Shans and Mons: Adding two maps showing the passage for migration) 00:20, January 21, 2010 (diff | hist) m Kyar Ba Nyein ‎ (→Achievements: spacing) 22:16, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Adding Assam, Manipur and Nagaland to complete the understanding of Burma's ancient history) 21:28, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Adding the history of History of Tibet to complete the prehistoric Burma) 21:16, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Adding the history of Yunnan to know the prehistoric Burma) 20:10, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Chinese history and migration/assimilations) 19:54, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Added the rarely recorded history of Many ethnic groups such as Tibets etc) 19:21, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Indus civilization of India) 19:11, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Adding the Indus Valley Civilization) 18:55, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Out of Africa: Adding mtDNA-based chart (model) of early human migrations of Africa to Asia) 18:42, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Out of Africa: Out of Africa through Europe, migrated to India and China) 18:38, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Out of Africa: Chariot spread immage from wiki) 17:42, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Adjusting space) 17:41, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Correcting Int link) 17:39, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Salones and Pashu (Malays of Burma) arrival to Burma through sea route from Taiwan) 17:34, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Out of Africa: Adding Africa to Asia migration facts) 17:30, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Just shifting the paragraph downwards) 17:28, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Adding Migration into and out of India) 15:41, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) User:Darz kkg ‎ (→Articles I have authored, started or expanded on Wikipedia: Adding two articles wher I contributed) 15:38, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) List of former sovereign states ‎ (→Asia: Dynasties in Burma) 15:25, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) List of pre-modern states ‎ (→Burma: Adding Pyu and Mons ancient states of Burma) 14:40, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Changing place of map upwards) 14:38, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Adding Chola Empire influence in early Burma) 13:49, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Indian and Burmese settlement in Arakan: Wesali = Vaisali) 13:18, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Early history of Burma ‎ (Upgrading the tag to the level of another same article with same topic and after improving by adding facts and references) 12:40, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Indian and Burmese settlement in Arakan: space) 12:28, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Migration period of ancient Burma ‎ (→Merger proposal: Explaining about the different links about the two articles) 12:27, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Early history of Burma ‎ (→Merger proposal: Explaining about the two articles) 12:15, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Salones (Moken) and Pashus (Malays): Int lk) 12:14, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Early history of Burma ‎ (→Verification issues/ neutral point of view issues: Merger proposal) 12:10, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Talk:Migration period of ancient Burma ‎ (Merger proposal for the two articles with same name or heading) 11:53, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Reference Books for further reading: Adding more reference books) 11:51, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Salones (Moken) and Pashus (Malays): space) 11:47, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→References: Adding Salones (Moken) and Pashus (Malays) settlement in the south) 10:54, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Reference Books for further reading: minor edit) 10:53, January 20, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Reference Books: Adding another book) 22:13, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→References: Adding the List of Reference books) 22:03, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) User:Darz kkg ‎ (→Articles I have authored, started or expanded on Wikipedia: Explaining my work on this article) 22:00, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Geography that facilitated the migration of Tibeto-Burma groups: Changing to a more inclusive heading, Geography that facilitated the migration of Tibeto-Burman, Shans and Mons) 21:58, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Geography that facilitated the migration of Tibeto-Burma groups: Adding Burma is like a big super-highway between India and China) 21:56, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m Indians in Burmese History ‎ (Bold for the sub-heaing) 21:49, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Added in the ethnic minorities: Tibeto-Burmans, Shans and Mons of future Burma) 21:47, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Indian and Burmese settlement in Arakan: spaceing) 21:46, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Forefathers of Bamars: space) 21:36, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→References: Expended, so no more stub) 21:35, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (Out of date Tag. Given references or sources. May need to put a new Tag for Wikification and improvement) 21:33, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Taiwan to Yellow and Yangtze rivers. Thro' Yunnan migrated to Burma) 20:21, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Forefathers of Bamars: Adding the Geography that facilitated the migration of Tibeto-Burma groups) 20:07, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Earliest migrants amongst Myanmars: Mon migration period) 20:01, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (Adding Bronze Age life in Burma by Dr Than Tun) 19:52, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Indian and Burmese settlement in Arakan: Prehistoric period of Arakan, Burma) 19:48, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Forefathers of Bamars: Indian and Burmese settlement in Arakan) 19:22, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Forefathers of Bamars: Shifted from above paragraph only) 19:21, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Earliest migrants amongst Myanmars: Tibeto Burmans should be below) 19:10, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Heading shifted) 19:09, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Earliest migrants amongst Myanmars: Shifting Heading upwards) 19:03, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Mons or Talaings origin from India) 18:52, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Indian Dravidian tribe, and Vsnu @ Beikthno) 18:46, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Correcting Orrisa as Buddhists) 18:43, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through India: Orrisa and Andra migration into Burma) 18:33, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Through China: Taiwan was the origi of second wave of migration) 18:21, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (New headings) 17:20, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m Early history of Burma ‎ (→Oral traditions: The name of the heading is no more relevant now. After puting the facts about various groups of Burma migrate from Taiwan to China then to Burma, I will try to made new subheadin) 17:16, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (Migration out of Africa to Taiwan) 17:00, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (Early humans (before Homo sapiens) migration) 16:38, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (Adding Pre-modern migrations) 14:23, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m Kyar Ba Nyein ‎ (minor edit) 13:40, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Oral traditions: Facts about contradicting ideas: Mongol origin and belief of having Royal blood-line from Sakyans of Aryan Race. Given reference) 13:20, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (→Oral traditions: Adding more facts about early settlers in Burma and giving inline references) 13:05, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (Adding inline reference) 12:52, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) m User:Darz kkg ‎ (→Articles I have authored, started or expanded on Wikipedia: Adding an article I have contributed more facts) 12:49, January 19, 2010 (diff | hist) Early history of Burma ‎ (Adding facts about prehistoric time with reference) Darz kkg (talk) 03:26, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry about that. I did not pay much attention to edit history. But, the problem is there are two similar articles with similar content. (Early history of Burma and Early History of Burma). You may try to preserve your edit history by copy and paste this article back to Early history of Burma title and request an administrator to delete the redirect. And then, move it again to this link (Migration period of ancient Burma). Soewinhan (talk) 04:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I copied Soewinhan's reply in that article's discussion page. But I am fed up with WIKI's system happening like this. I could not waste my time doing all these. Darz kkg (talk) 08:28, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the cut and paste move. But now, I've requested to merge the histories of the two articles at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. But as you have said, "This is happening in dozens of your articles", you may wish to merge the histories of your other articles. You just give them the old article title and the new (current) one. They will undertake the merger themselves. Thanks. Soewinhan (talk) 17:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TQ very much for your kind help. Apology is even unnessary. --Darz kkg (talk) 06:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Ganesha in world religions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Śakra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you probably have a lot more experience now than when you did this, but I hope you can see why those categories for "Lists of..." are not appropriate for an article on a single person. If it's still confusing to you, please let me know! – Fayenatic London 20:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help reorganize the content in the biography section for Saya Gyi U Nu? See the talk page for details. Thanks. -AngusWOOF (talk) 06:51, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Darz kkg! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 14:23, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

TQ for invitation...But sorry, nowadays I am quite busy with my General Practice Clinic and the heat up of politics in Myanmar. Later, if I am free I will try to participate. TQ again Regards DARZKKGDarz kkg (talk) 10:12, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Brexit, you may be blocked from editing. I have reverted this disruption. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:48, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SORRY

But I have no intention to vandalize my beloved Wikipedia as you could see my good record for a dozen of years of publishing new articles and editing with new facts.

But yes, I know that I have written in a wrong place. Sorry for that.

I was just carried away with my invention of a new coined term BRPMEXIT or British PM Exit for the list of British PMs removed or resigned relating the Brexit.

But if possible you Wikipedians need to be more polite in writing. Because of these kind of rude Wikipedians I tried NOT to write or edit in Wikipedia for many years.

Please mind your words as I have no intention to vandalize my beloved Wikipedia. Anyway TQ for editing to correct my error.

You have the right to remove my edit in the main article but if I am not wrong you should not delete by suggestion in the talk page whether it is right or wrong. You should just reply there under my suggestion and also here to remind me.

Never mind. I have decided to stay away from editing Wiki as much as possible. Anyway TQ for the rude word so that my desire to edit would be stopped.--Darz kkg (talk) 11:33, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick(Talk) 12:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC) With due respect...Why you need to DELETE ALL the facts? You could leave some facts AS WIKI always demand for the REFERENCES. I wrote with references. Please kindly put back some facts as gysts. Because of this kind of Wikipedians I used to stay away from Wikipedia--Darz kkg (talk) 12:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Tun Tin has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 10:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]