Talk:Red-whiskered bulbul

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Low‑importance Red-whiskered bulbul is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more) Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more) Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more) Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more) NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more) Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more) Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more) Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more) Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

I'd added the name "Krong-hua-juk (กรงหัวจุก) in Thai" (which I get from Google Images, etc.) but reverted it. Despite Google's opinion, I'm starting to think the bird that locals are excited about here is actually Hoopoe (Upupa epops). Septimus.stevens (talk) 05:54, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: this edit: The new thumbnail is certainly far superior as a picture, but I think that the lower-resolution picture that was previously used as the bird-identifying thumbnail is clearer in showing the bird as a small thumbnail. What do you all think? Should we revert the edit, even though the current picture is certainly a better picture? Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I'm not sure, since the new thumbnail shows the tail. I'd like to see other opinions. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support retaining the present image which shows the tail. Tail features in description and hence the image is more encyclopaedic. AshLin (talk) 11:22, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I read about the subspecies, but the info was not sufficient. Pls explain how to identify subspecies. Uploader1234567890 (talk) 16:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:HOWTO; this isn't what Wikipedia is for. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Uploader1234567890 (talk) 17:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]