User talk:Septimus.stevens

Hello!

Hi Septimus.stevens! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/USPC Presidential Rankings.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 18:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The rankings you added to Historical rankings of Presidents of the United States and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/USPC Presidential Rankings are not what you believe them to be. They are Siena college rankings not USPC ones. I've added archives and links to the first article to confirm this. Or see http://web.archive.org/web/20120511165919/http://americas.sas.ac.uk/research/survey/presidents.htm and http://web.archive.org/web/20120419031350/http://americas.sas.ac.uk/research/survey/overall.htm vs http://www.siena.edu/uploadedfiles/home/parents_and_community/community_page/sri/independent_research/Presidents%202010%20Rank%20by%20Category.pdf . Nil Einne (talk) 12:40, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of St Crispin's Day Speech, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://oldpoetry.com/William_Shakespeare/8449463-St_Crispins_Day_Speech_from_Henry_V.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 06:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/USPC Presidential Rankings, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:19, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Septimus.stevens. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "USPC Presidential Rankings".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/USPC Presidential Rankings}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article St Crispin's Day Speech has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page consists entirely of the text of a monologue from Henry V—it is not an encyclopedic article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Escher Curve has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This term appears completely non-notable. The only source is someone's opinion on a discussion forum. Beyond the bare use of the term, no assertions in the article are sourced. The tone of the original forum post also strongly suggests that the article is concealing a significant bias in the use of the term.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlexTiefling (talk) 12:31, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on TFTSTHAN requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Boleyn (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as PALIMPZEZT, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paradoctor (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Palimpzezt, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paradoctor (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to Inception, please be aware that, per Wikipedia's guidelines on referring to transgender and nonbinary people, we use someone's current name, not the name they had at the time a film came out, unless they request otherwise. Instead, there is a footnote there explaining what Page's name was at the time. If you have any questions about the implementation of that guideline, it's best to bring them up on the article's talkpage. -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 16:26, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I figured the fastest way to learn the policy was to Edit the page! I was right. Septimus.stevens (talk) 21:13, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you have any other policy questions in the future, feel free to let me know, either on my talkpage or by using {{ping|Tamzin}} here. Also, not sure if you meant to do this or not, but please don't edit other users' comments. Thanks. :) -- Tamzin (she/they) | o toki tawa mi. 21:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]