AnonEMouse

Thank you for contributions to the project (meticulous sourcing, and not article subjects to get up to quality status that easily either), Great work! May you wear the crowns well. Cirt (talk) 00:59, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have a feeling that the answer is no because it is an electronic source but your opinion would be appreciated. : Albion moonlight (talk) 03:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

My effort to regain adminship was unsuccessful. Thank you for taking some time out of your day to voice your opinion.--MONGO 05:22, 28 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I'll take you up on this offer. CM (talk) 23:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mouse would you take a look at this user page? If you look at the history it looks like Thamarih wanted to blank it and some other user reverted it. That seems odd to me. The sock case was closed by you as no evidence. I'm wondering if this user is being harassed, I see no reason to keep this blabber all over his user page. User page isn't a talk page. Can you assist? Thanks. Wjhonson (talk) 08:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey there bud, I wanted to let you know that I just enrolled in the edit review process and was wondering that since we have worked on some stuff together and I had dealt with you when I was doing the editing to the male porn stars section. I was wondering if you would be kind enough to maybe go through some of my edits and contributions and give a chime in on how you view me as an editor and contributor to wikipedia. I am registered right here [1]. Any help you can give would be greatly appreciated. I believe you would see that I had my user name changed from Junebug52 to Canyouhearmenow. It was a little more on the masculine side and people didn't have to wonder if they were dealing with a guy or girl. LOL Canyouhearmenow 20:53, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't know if you've seen this article, but would you stop by the AfD page Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/SocialPicks to offer your opinion on whether the article subject is notable? It looks like a couple of admins are campaigning for "delete" votes, so I think it might be good if some other admins take a look at what is going on. Thanks. Dimension31 (talk) 01:02, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Buscema#Request_for_Comment_-_Integrate_two_versions

--Skyelarke (talk) 14:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi

I'm sorry for bothering, but I really need your help. User:Doc glasgow has reverted the Bonanno crime family page that I've written countless times, due to the fact that he/she means that there are no sources confirming the information I've written on the crime family's bosses and caporegimes, however, I have given up my sources from where I got the information, both from Jerry Capeci's Gangland, as well as the New York Times and the Federal Burea of Investigation news pages on organized crime. Although letting him/her know about this, User:Doc glasgow has not only reverted the Bonanno crime family page, making it seem undone, but also made abusive threats about blocking me from Wikipedia, when really it should be User:Doc glasgow who should be blocked. This person can not be reasoned with, as he/she has been reverting both the Bonanno crime family page, as well as the Colombo crime family page, in addition, the person can not be reasoned with. Please, I need your help! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlir91 (talk • contribs) 14:18, April 1, 2008

I'm sorry for bothering, but User:Doc glasgow has repeatedly given me abusve threats of blocking me from Wikipedia, when he has completely disregarded all the sources I've given up at the Bonanno crime family page, as well as at the Frank Papagni page. Please, I really, really, really need your help!!

Thanks for uploading Image:Donna-Rice-Hughes-5.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Andrea_Mackris_Benedict_Morelli.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:02, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:The_Stewardesses.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 03:05, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Reply

I have tagged Image:Evil_Breed_The_Legend_of_Samhain.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Reply

Come back soon ... or at least tell us everything is okay (assuming, of course, that it is). The arbitration pages, among many other places, aren't the same without our Squeaker of the House. Newyorkbrad (talk) 19:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Zombie Strippers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Zombie Strippers. Torchwood Who? (talk) 02:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Briana Loves Jenna.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Briana Loves Jenna.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 17:37, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Image:PaigeSummersPent199801.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:PaigeSummersPent199801.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Image:Try Everything Once Except Incest and Morris Dancing.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the image can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Try Everything Once Except Incest and Morris Dancing.jpeg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:19, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading Image:Family Guy Jenna Jameson.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sdrtirs (talk) 19:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading Image:Silent Prey.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:20, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Alessandra Mussolini.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC) Reply

You're one of the good ones, AnonEMouse, and you're missed here. Here's hoping your encounter with that pesky "Real life" turns out with great success, and you're back here before long. Cheers! Dekkappai (talk) 17:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I thought you might have died or become ill or something bad like that. It is very good to see that you are merely on an indefinite wiki break. Be well and may the force be with you, You were one of the best admins wiki had to offer. I hope you decide to return as an active admin soom. : Albion moonlight (talk) 07:19, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I nominated this for deletion from the commons. I communicated with Annie and she says she never put this image into the public domain at all. Thanks! --BenBurch (talk) 04:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could you maybe help me with getting more info for the references so it could be more visable on the NOTES Kelvin Martinez (talk) 00:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Honorific titles in popular musicReply

Hi, Kelvin - AnonEMouse really isn't active here right now - you should probably make your help request elsewhere. Regards - Kelly ^hi! 01:15, 13 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've always wondered this.............how exactly does one go about becoming a Wikipedia administrator? Veldin963 (talk) 05:58, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Serious answer: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship. Here's mine: Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/AnonEMouse.

Only slightly less serious answer:  

If you want a response in fewer than the 6 months this took, ask someone who doesn't have an "inactive" banner on their talk page. :-) --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 20:31, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading Image:Silent Prey.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The image had "one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline" for a year now. Please don't use boilerplate that doesn't say what you mean. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 20:28, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:Carol Shaya Playboy August 1994.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Stifle. You wrote the following on my talk page:

Thank you for uploading Image:Silent Prey.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy.

Since that image had one of those templates at the time you wrote that, giving great detail as to why the rationale was met, I have no clue what you're on about. Please don't use boilerplate that doesn't say what you mean. I gather you want the image deleted; if so, please say why. I'd also appreciate, as a personal favor, if you not rush, since I haven't been not very active for almost a year now, and it might take me some time to hold up my end of the discussion, though I will do my best. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 20:18, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The rationale you added to that page did not include a purpose of use, which is a requirement. (This is the version I tagged. Another user has subsequently added the purpose correctly, so there is nothing else for you to do. Stifle (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I did that. Sure wish they could make a bot that would fix these descriptions for perfectly good images, instead of tagging them for deletion. Because many perfectly good images get deleted that way... And good to see you, Mouse. Dekkappai (talk) 21:07, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hm. The template added 11:18, November 14, 2008 by Sfan00 IMG didn't have a purpose of use field. However the rationale I added at the time I uploaded the image distinctly said "The image is used as the primary means of visual identification of the article section dealing with this video", which seems to be a fine purpose of use. So it seems that by adding the template Sfan actually made the image more likely to be deleted by someone, such as yourself, not less. Surely there is something wrong here. Oh well, thanks to Dekkappai, it's not an issue any more. Thanks, Dek. Good to see you too. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 21:29, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi AnonEMouse -- I know you don't stop by Wikipedia as much as you used to, but on the off-chance you do look in during the next 7 days, this image was nominated for deletion & you may want to offer your opinion. Otherwise, I opposed the nomination & quoted the comments you made a year & ahalf ago that this image was not easily replaceable. Even if you see this notice too late (or no longer care), still I feel it's the civil thing to keep you informed. -- llywrch (talk) 18:53, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

You may remember me from when you helped with the Alice Bailey article, and may not be happy about another request from me to help with an RfC for a very controversial and very disputed article. You can see the RfC here. I am asking you because the administrator who initiated the RfC in response to a complaint to OTRS, has not participated, and some impartial administrative guidance might prove very helpful. Let me know if you are willing, and if you think you efforts could help.

I hope you have been well. (Once Kwork) Malcolm Schosha (talk) 23:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Looking more closely, as I should have in the first place, is seems that you are back only infrequently, and I am sure you would not want to get involved in an article that is so disputed.

Be well. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 15:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Template:911ct supporters has been nominated for deletion by Ice Cold Beer. As this TfD nomination includes objections to the same list of people that is currently in use in Template:911ct, I am inviting you to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. (I am sending this message to you as a current or former editor of Template:911ct, following the guideline on multiple messages.) Regards —  Cs32en  08:31, 30 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you had rated Jesse Levine as B class a while back. It's been worked on a bit since then (and he had a career-best showing at Wimbledon), and I was wondering if you might look at it to see if it yet warrants GA status. Many thanks.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have reassessed the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. There are some concerns which you can see at Talk:David Heymann/GA1. If these are not addressed, the article will be de-listed. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:Notimex.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:19, 29 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

....even if it's just a hit-and-run editing session, though I hope you're going to be more active. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:41, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wow, great to hear you feel that way! How things change over a few years! I'm afraid I can't promise anything long term, that real life stuff is still there. But great to hear that I made a positive impression on you somehow! --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 11:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Leanni Lei. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leanni Lei. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Yasmine Bleeth mugshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 22:16, 12 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kathy Boudin mugshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 00:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:TWBGB2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:19, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Yasmine Bleeth mugshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:49, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Carol Shaya. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Shaya. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Following your comment on the file talk page, I've restored and listed at at Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 21#File:Silent Prey.jpg. PhilKnight (talk) 23:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Silent Prey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article International Escort Awards has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the GNG; no independent significant coverage, just puffery from sites associated with the ward's (non-notable) sponsors, self-published sites, and the occasional brief news-of-the-weird type story.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi, since I checked that you were an admin, please could you delete my template. Find it on Template:User:Trikster87/List of Wikias, then delete it. It's because I don't want it anymore and I was planning to do something else on my user page. Thanks! Trikster87 (talk), 10:32, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Happy Thanksgiving Tony the Marine (talk), 25 November 2010

Hi, AnonEMouse. I need your help for one of Pornographic actor's article Ramon Nomar, i created this article as stub and now it has been declared as nominee for deletion, reason was given that it doesn't fulfill the criteria of WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. This article was made to represent the significance of Venezuelan pornographic actors (none of them have any article on wikipedia). I need your help in this matter, you are pretty experienced and can watch it properly, i think notability criteria should not be bounded to the count of number of Awards, it must reveal the significance of particular ethnic/geographic group/region. Hope you'll observe & support this. Bill william compton (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Carol Shaya Playboy August 1994.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 03:47, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Silent Prey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:08, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PaigeSummersPent199801.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Try Everything Once Except Incest and Morris Dancing.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:18, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dana Plato mugshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 17:20, 26 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 20:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Escort Awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Escort Awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:23, 16 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi AnonEMouse, My name is Matthew Roth and I'm a Storyteller working on the 2011 fundraiser with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. I know you are inactive, but I'm curious if you would want to talk with me about some historical editing work you've done. It wouldn't necessarily be for the fundraiser, but I'm very curious to get your take on a number of aspects of the project? I was particularly intrigued by the work you did to bring Jenna Jameson up to FA status. I think it's remarkable that on WP you can have excellent prose and material on anyone from nobel laureates to adult film actors. The interviews usually last 60 minutes and involve a number of questions about your personal editing experiences, as well as general questions about Wikipedia and its impact in the world. Please let me know your thoughts by emailing mroth (at) wikimedia.org. Thanks! Matthew (WMF) 18:15, 6 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

-) A mostly inactive former admin now, of course; but I very much appreciate it. Thanks! --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 21:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

I invite you to the yearly Berlin hackathon, 1-3 June. Registration is now open. If you need financial assistance or help with visa or hotel, then please register by May 1st and mention it in the registration form.

This is the premier event for the MediaWiki and Wikimedia technical community. We'll be hacking, designing, teaching, and socialising, primarily talking about ResourceLoader and Gadgets (extending functionality with JavaScript), the switch to Lua for templates, Wikidata, and Wikimedia Labs.

We want to bring 100-150 people together, including lots of people who have not attended such events before. User scripts, gadgets, API use, Toolserver, Wikimedia Labs, mobile, structured data, templates -- if you are into any of these things, we want you to come!

I also thought you might want to know about other upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC and our other events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation Volunteer Development Coordinator 00:47, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to see you're not around. Hope all is well with you!—D'Ranged 1 ^talk 04:25, 26 August 2012 (UTC) (formerly ChiDom/Rentaferret)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:Undressing Emmanuelle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Logging in as (very temporarily) active, boss. :-) --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 01:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

User:Catherineyronwode/Carroll Runyon, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Catherineyronwode/Carroll Runyon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Catherineyronwode/Carroll Runyon during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 18:51, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Jenna Jameson was nominated to be Today's Featured Article, discussion at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests. — Cirt (talk) 18:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

It was nominated by Minimac. — Cirt (talk) 18:51, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Jenna Jameson for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. --Harizotoh9 (talk) 02:09, 17 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the notice, and for working to improve the article. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 03:04, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks! I look forward to working with such a "spirited" individual as yourself... :) --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 16:30, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

BTW, just caught your edit summary re: Eric and I agree... :) --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:PaigeSummersPent199801.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:12, 4 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Donna Rice and Gary Hart.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MASEM (t) 16:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:An Honourable Deception.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:23, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

You seem to be an authority on biographies, and an admin, according to WP:WPBIO. I'm having some issues right now with a user deleting an image I added to the article for Viktor Tsoi, a deceased Russian rock musician. The user, Hullaballoo Wolfowitz, claims that

1. The image fails NFCC#1 (which it does not, as there are no other free photos of the singer with his family, and the singer, as well as his wife, are dead)
2. The image fails NFCC#8
3. I don't need a non-free image of the article subject's family to convey the fact of its existence
4. The image use rationale is patently invalid

I was wondering, seeing as you are a person with actual authority and proven knowledge on the subject of biographies, if you could take a look at the Viktor Tsoi page and figure out which one of us is in the right, and what I can do to improve the image's fair use rationale. Or, if you're not the right person to ask, then I hope you can point me in the right direction.

Thank you for your time, AndreyKva (talk) 22:01, 15 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Briana Loves Jenna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Briana Loves Jenna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 09:31, 29 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Briana Loves Jenna.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marylin Star, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marylin Star (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louise Glover, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Glover (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply