Sdrtirs

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:USGov-PD. Since you had some involvement with the Template:USGov-PD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:44, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:C.D. Santa Clara.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Requested a PNG version ({{Should be PNG}}). --Sdrtirs (talk) 21:23, 1 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Polícia de Segurança Pública logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:10, 19 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello Sdrtirs. I'm very slow to notice this, but this edit from you in December was off the mark, I think.

Every sentence/fact in the article is cited, so a general refimprove tag is not needed. If you have specific issues with the sourcing, please improve it where you can or note on the talk page where it might be lacking. I think that notability is well established by the coverage in the mainstream press already cited in the article, so that tag is surely unnecessary. If you genuinely don't believe that this club is notable, please go to AfD rather than adding the tag back so that issue can be resolved.

I find the COI tag to be unwarranted. It asserted that "A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject" - as the creator and only major contributor to this article, I have no connection to this club whatsoever; I have not even visited it and nor do I personally know anyone who has, and I certainly wasn't paid to write the article. I had simply heard of it and was interested in reading more on it, but when I looked on Wikipedia there was no article on it. I didn't intend to write a biased or promotional article, and I think I fairly reflected the sources I could find.

You noted the deletion log on the talk page - the article was indeed speedily deleted by User:PMDrive1061 as I did not add the sources I had to hand when I first hit "save", partly due to my browser being in the process of crashing at the time, but that cannot count against the article now, several years on and with reliable sources cited. It was the first completely new Wikipedia article I had written, and I was unfamiliar with the requirements to get past the gauntlet of the new page patrollers unscathed. I discussed the speedy deletion with that admin at the time, see User talk:PMDrive1061/Archive_2#Speedy_deletion and User talk:Fences and windows/Archive 1#Speedy deletion of Torture garden (fetish_club). Please don't presume COIs without evidence. You can consult people at WP:COIN if you still have doubts. Fences&Windows 18:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:C.D. Santa Clara.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 19:34, 27 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:Utherverse logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 6 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

The article Betcee May has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable model per WP:BIO and WP:PORNBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dismas|^(talk) 13:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Hypnotiq.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:26, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Renee Perez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renee Perez until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:44, 8 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Britney Rears 3 Britney Gets Shafted.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Daniels (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Daniels (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:09, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Britney Rears Wild Back Stage Sex Party.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jana Jordan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jana Jordan (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:05, 30 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Instituto Superior de Ciências do Trabalho e da Empresa (logo, 1972-2009).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. GMG^talk 12:35, 20 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Just a heads-up as a courtesy, because you did the last edit on Nude magazine, which was to make it a redirect to List of pornographic magazines... the actual magazine Nude does not in fact feature pornography or nudity but is about creative artists (e.g. photographers, stylists, makeup artists, even musicians, as well as models — all shown clothed), as its website and this site with collected covers indicate. Making assumptions by the title alone might have led one to redirect Life magazine to List of biology journals. – _•Raven  ^.talk 14:28, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krista Ayne is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krista Ayne until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Morbidthoughts (talk) 09:03, 1 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Category:English-language television shows has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:27, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply