Acsenray

Hi. Please note that I moved your article "Rockefeller Republicans" to "List of liberal U.S. Republicans"; see Talk:List of liberal U.S. Republicans for my reasons. Note that there was an older existing article at Rockefeller Republican which I guess you were unaware of. Once links to your article are cleaned up, I suggest that "Rockefeller Republicans" be changed from a rediect to "List of liberal U.S. Republicans" into a redirect to "Rockefeller Republican". Cheers, -- Infrogmation 17:23, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)

I hope you plan to add some descriptive text. --Hemanshu 16:31, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Seen you've done a great deal on Ohio politicians--thought you might be interesting in commenting on Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. politicians. Keep up the good work! jengod 21:04, Aug 4, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for straightening me out on the Tafts and their names. Appreciate it! Tim 15:30, Aug 5, 2004 (UTC)

I see you've expanded the "Accusations, impeachment, and legal problems" section of the Bill Clinton article. Unfortunately, I believe some of it will be considered non-NPOV and much of it belongs, perhaps, in other articles dealing with specific scandals (whether they currently exist or not). I have no strong interest myself in maintaining the Clinton article so please don't take this as an attack; I just figured I'd give you a friendly warning before you start seeing others reverting your edits. Also, I see that you're a journalist. You might need to try extra hard to resist turning the presidential bio pages into newspaper exposés. ;-) See also What wikipedia is not. - dcljr 19:38, 11 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You asked me to check out the Bill Clinton article again. The "Accusations..." section seems fine now, except the figure $850,000 is mentioned twice. Other than that it looks good. - dcljr 16:39, 31 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I'm working on it as we speak. [[User:Supadawg|supadawg -  ]] 22:18, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)

What do you think? Over the top? [[User:Supadawg|supadawg - Talk]] 17:30, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

In response to your note on my talk page: My source for elected officials is Official Roster of Federal, State, and County Officers and The Ohio Municipal, Township and School Board Roster, both published by the Ohio Secretary of State. It looks like that information is also available on the Secretary of State's web site. [1] Unfortunately, it doesn't look to go down to the level of local zoning board and so forth. That information may only be available at the local level. Jwolfe 03:43, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Great job with the table!

I did make one change in Georgia - the only state of which I am qualified to speak - from "Circuit Superior Court" to "Superior Court". Pleadings, orders &c. are captioned "Superior Court of _______ County", although judges and D.A.'s normally have their stationery, signatures etc. Judge/District Attorney for the ______________ Judicial Circuit.

Thanks! Ellsworth 13:24, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Good job with the continued markup. Keep it up. Ellsworth

Thanks for turning the stub I created (because I don't like red links) into a decent reference. It gave me a warm feeling to see it. Rich Farmbrough 10:47, 23 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words. I'd seen your handle on some of the pages I'd worked on, e.g. my former congressman, Frank Cremeans. I've also expanded some articles you began, John W. Griffin, Thomas Kindness, Bill Harsha. Good to read your article on the lady challenging Michael R. Turner this year. That's my congressional district and I didn't know anything about her save her name. You've probably seen it, but I've a long list of articles I've made sizable contributions to on my user page including many in legal and political biography. For example, I put the predecessor/successor boxes on all the associate justices of the Supreme Court and wrote blurbs on all the reporters save the current one who I haven't been able to find anything on.
May I make one suggestion about creating new biographies? If you create articles under a nickname, e.g. Tom Kindness, would you put in redirects under the full name? I didn't see your Kindness article at first and started writing either under Thomas or Thomas N, then combined the two. I know I'm guilty of this as well because when I went to look at my own Charles Sanders article just now, I couldn't find it because I'd entered it under Charles W. Sanders.
If I can be of help, let me know. PedanticallySpeaking 17:18, Oct 7, 2004 (UTC)

My apologies if I bumped into you on the Government of Ohio article. I saw it down on my watchlist where you'd worked on it earlier today and took a look, which spurred me to make a couple revisions to the section on the State Board of Ed. I just noticed from the edit history you were on there at the same time and I probably caused you an edit conflict. I do apologize.
One useful wikipedia call is to put the "inuse" template at the top of a page you are editing. That will put up a flag warning everyone to step aside because you are working. I use this especially when I'm making a lot of edits because some of our eagle-eyed contributors waste no time to start editing. But be careful to delete it when you are done or else people will grumble. Ave atque vale! PedanticallySpeaking 16:10, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)

Oops. You're right. As far as I can tell they are both named Richard A. Zimmer. If I knew what their initials stood for I'd make Dick Zimmer a disambig page with their full names for their own pages. How would you like to proceed. Something like Dick Zimmer (commissioner) and Dick Zimmer (representative)? AlistairMcMillan 00:16, 20 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Please avoid moving a page by cutting and pasting it's contents into a new location. The appropiate action is to use the "move" tab at the top of the page, which opens a page asking for the new title. Additionally, when moving a page, please be sure no double redirects are created, as happened at Ted Roosevelt. Thanks. Gentgeen 19:26, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Acesnray,
I copied the party affiliations of the Secretaries of State from the list in the back of the Ohio Secretary of State's "Official Roster of Federal, State and County Officers" (Columbus, Ohio: The Secretary, biennial). The one Secretary with no party listed in the Wikipedia article is also blank in the book. The older editions have information deleted from the newer, such as the legal descriptions of the Congressional districts from the first apportionment onward. I debating whether I want to get involved with posting that. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 15:54, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)

Greetings, Acsenray!
My big project last week or so has been List of Ohio county name etymologies and its two subsidiary articles, which are finally done. Any thoughts? Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 17:21, Oct 23, 2004 (UTC)

Salve, Acsenray!
I've posted a report on the election in our state at Talk:2004_U.S._election_in_progress#Ohio:_A_Report_From_the_Front and on my talk page. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 20:48, Nov 2, 2004 (UTC)

Was there any discussion about moving Christopher S. Bond to Kit Bond? Even though he is widely know as "Kit", isn't it somewhat unusual to list a person under their nickname instead of their given name? --Kbh3rd 18:30, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)

• Salve, Acesnray!
  Haven't seen you much lately. Hope all is well along the Potomac. Your changes to Bob McEwen and a couple other articles popped up on my watchlist and I noticed you made some changes regarding numbers, changing words to numbers, and replacing the word "percent" with the percent symbol. I was taught in school to spell out numbers under one-hundred and in journalism class to always use the word percent in stories rather than the symbol and our stylebook endorses the latter while says either is acceptable on the former. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(dates_and_numbers)#Number_names. Ave atque vale! PedanticallySpeaking 15:45, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

• Salve!
  I was looking in the wrong column in the "compare versions". You changed it to "percent" from "%". Sorry about that. Some of us can't read. I'm going to make a proposal to the stylebook re spelling out numbers. To me, it just looks odd to see "24". I do recognize the AP uses numerals, but we don't have the same space concerns as they or printed reference works do. I'm going to make queries about where to post my proposal and when get it up, I'll let you know so you can offer your comments. One other thing. You've been putting up results for this months elections; will you be sure to get the final numbers when the elections are certified? Ave atque vale! PedanticallySpeaking 16:01, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)

Hi. I hadn't realized or remembered about the west-central placement for Dayton. I went to high school in Xenia, but that was some years ago. Anyway, I added "west-central" back to the intro and made a few other changes. See what you think. Maurreen 05:33, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hi there! I'm glad you want to contribute to the List of U.S. political families, but please note that it is, strictly speaking, confined to family members who are politically active. Neil Bush, Barbara and Jenna Bush, etc., are not politically active at present (although who knows about the future?), so they should not be included. Moreover, the list is not meant to be a scandallog. It's not a place to include Bush's daughters' underage drinking (which you put in) or Kennedy's nephews cocaine snorting (which you didn't). Therefore, I have reverted your latest edits. If you want to print scandal, however, List of notable U.S. presidential relatives is the perfect place for you - Neil Bush is already there, you can add Barbara and Jenna if you wish, etc. David Cannon 08:22, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Howdy. I've been going back and forth on whether to delete the Hagans and Riffes from the List of U.S. Political Families page, and I figured I'd drop you a friendly note before doing anything rash. The talk page on that article seems to have dried up and I never got any responses to my query about what threshhold should be set for calling a family a "U.S." family, as opposed to something else, as part of my mission to clean up and standardize that page. Neither the Hagans nor the Riffes seem to have contributed any individuals to any national political office; the number of families with multiple members active in state and county politics in all the states is enormous, especially if history is taken into account, and I can't justify trying to add all those families. While the Hagans and Riffes are no doubt notable in Ohio, I don't believe they belong on a page devoted to nationally notable families. I'm leaning toward deleting, but I'll let you have your say if you wish. Perhaps a page of Ohio political families is in order. Thehappysmith 04:48, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This article started by you has been blanked by two anon's claiming it's inaccurate. I've reverted it, but I thouhgt I'd mention it to you, in case you had some response. JesseW 03:47, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Been tracking your edits since this morning. We will end up disagreeing on some things and agreeing on others. But I thought I would drop a line to say hello. You seem to have a fascinating mix of interests.—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 21:19, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Returning your greetings. I wonder what you might disagree with in my recent edits, most of what I've done today has been rather minor. Acsenray 21:22, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Like I said, we'll agree as often as we disagree. Take a look at Talk:Hindustani language.—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 21:28, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Oh, and Talk:List of Mughal emperors.—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 21:29, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

You didn't like what you saw there? :D—iFaqeer (Talk to me!) 23:16, Nov 29, 2004 (UTC)

Suppose that we are electing a school board or town council where there are no districts, and the election is "at large". Suppose that there are N vacancies. The voter might have 1 vote to cast amongst the several candidates, or N votes, or 1 <= M <= N. Which applies in Cincinnati, Ohio. How many names must a voter cross off on the ballot paper?

If the answer is N, then the board or council is likely to be run by a landslide result, with no representation from other parties, even the second biggest party.

If the answer is M, then a landslide is less likely, and there is likely to be some reprentation from the second biggest party.

If the answer is 1, then there is likely to be wide selection of representation of big and small parties.

Thus the number of votes per voter is important.

PS I just noticed that the discussion for the Cinncinati elections left of the heading "How Many Votes per voter". DRAT.

Syd1435 07:44, 2004 Dec 3 (UTC)

Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 1000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

• Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
• Multi-Licensing Guide
• Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk) 18:07, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

Salve, Acsenray!
Hope this message finds you well. I saw the neat article you were working on the many Ohio towns that aren't in the county with that name (e.g. Hamilton, Warren, Butlerville, Clintonville). I had been thinking of doing something like that myself. Glad to see you put it together.
Today I did two short articles on Ohio government, Ohio State Board of Education (largely copied from one of the other government articles) and Ohio Ballot Board. I continued work on User:PedanticallySpeaking/In Progress, which when finished will be moved to Ohio election law. Let me know what you think of them.
Finally, it appears I somehow forgot to send you a note about my WP:RFA candidacy. I'd appreciate your vote here. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 19:10, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)

Salve, Acsenray!
Thanks for your congrats on my election. I was delighted with the positive comments I got in the election, even if the same issue as last time was drug up. I posted a comment in support of your peculiarities article here, that cites an example of the real confusion out there re our towns not being in the similiarly named county. Ave! PedanticallySpeaking 15:25, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)

Salve, Acsenray!
Haven't seen you in a while. Hope you are well. I radically expanded this article and nom'd it as a FAC. I'd appreciate your vote here. PedanticallySpeaking 18:59, May 26, 2005 (UTC)

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. It looks like you haven't been around lately, but if you come back and are at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. I've marked you on this list as "inactve". Feel free to update this as well. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) July 3, 2005 17:14 (UTC)

Salve, Acsenray!
Welcome back! I opened my watch list and who is on top but a familiar name that hasn't been seen in a while. In your absence, I've done several political articles, e.g. Jean Schmidt, Paul Hackett, Bob McEwen, Tom Brinkman, W. Mark Felt. Best wishes to you. PedanticallySpeaking 16:24, August 23, 2005 (UTC)

Hi,

I've completely redone the intro to the Hindustani article, based on the idea that, before Partition, the term referred to Urdu (standard Hindi didn't yet exist), and that it is but one of many "dialects" of Hindi, not the whole dialect chain, as the article presented it. Needless to say, the people who believe that Hindustani is a "mix" of Hindi and Urdu think this is absurd. I would appreciate any input you might have. kwami 21:16, 20 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hello, good work on Kim Zurz, and thanks for the contribution. However, you did not any references to the article. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a push to encourage editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. From what websites, books, or other places did you learn the information that you added to Kim Zurz? Would it be possible for you to mention them in the article? You can simply add links, or see WP:CITET if you wish to review some of the different citation methods. Thanks! Lupin|talk|popups 21:10, 4 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Greetings!
Haven't written you in a while. Hope you are well. I've submitted Bob McEwen as a Featured Article Candidate here and I'd appreciate your vote. PedanticallySpeaking 17:51, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your reply. The question of an article gaining feature status is not about how important the person or topic is but whether or not the article is any good. On my articles on Tom Brinkman and Julia Stiles objections were made when they were on the front page about how noteworthy the subjects were. I'm surprised I didn't get that on Helen Gandy, which was featured and on the front page a couple months ago. Thanks for writing back. PedanticallySpeaking 17:28, 24 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Dear fellow editor: I reorganized the references to "codified law" in the article on Statutory law (creating a separate paragraph at the end of the article) because I wanted to make sure that non-lawyers can understand that the term codified law is also used in a more narrow technical sense. I argue that the more narrow sense is the one most people (lawyers and non-lawyers alike) would run across. Yours, Famspear 23:26, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please see a question I posted at talk:List of Governors of California#Earl Warren, as your contribution to the article did not make sense to me. Thanks in advance, --Asbl 19:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Fred J. Shoemaker, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Fred J. Shoemaker. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Erechtheus 23:04, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Are you involved somehow? You have made some interesting edits. --198.185.18.207 22:03, 5 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

The plagiarism detector bot indicated that, two years ago, you added a large chunk of text to Murray Seasongood which was a direct copy-and-paste from the Cleveland Chamber of Commerce's site. That material has been removed; I hope that you have long since stopped doing that sort of thing. DS 01:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Seconded. -- Zanimum 19:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well, this is certainly an embarrassing situation and one that I would not have intended. Since the page has already been deleted, I can't go back and see what exactly it is I did, but I hope you accept my assurance that no direct copying was intended. At least, I hope so -- it's been so long that I don't even remember that particular page. I am fully aware on a personal, artistic, profesional, and legal levels of the importance of not copying things, so I hope to avoid repeating such mistakes. Acsenray 16:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your level-headed thinking is needed at Democratic-Republican Party. One person is trying to erase the concept of Jefferson's and Madison's Republican Party, from changing the (now) alternate name to "Republicans" and violating WP:MOS by unbolding the alt names in the first sentence. Skyemoor 16:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

For that fact, I don't have my reference. I'm trying to think where it came from. It wasn't from someone's blog or anything like that. Damn, I just can't remember. It's from one of those voting websites, something similar to vote smart or voteusa, but I just cannot remember right now. I'll look and verify that for you when I'm less buzy, ok? VitaleBaby 00:05, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!Acsenray 14:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I was wrong about his first name. I see what happened though. I found the voteusa page that I was looking at, and it had Stickland and Ted Kulongoski, who actually is Theodore, listed one after the other. So I screwed it up. Interesting that the guy's name is actually Ted though. VitaleBaby 04:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the followup! Acsenray 16:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Greg Harris (politician), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Fram 10:29, 29 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

An editor has nominated James McGee, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James McGee and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Tikiwont 14:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for picking this rather awkwrad template. Personally, I do not consider the Afd nomination warranted. Tikiwont 14:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Election Results, Dayton, Ohio, Municipal Court Judge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 09:12, 31 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Herb Hammer, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Herb Hammer seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Herb Hammer, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Roger Cloud, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. Hammer1980·^talk 10:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Election Results, Mayor of Cincinnati, Ohio (Primary Election), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Election Results, Mayor of Cincinnati, Ohio (Primary Election). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Lawrence Cohen 17:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joseph Levin, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Joseph Levin. Dchall1 (talk) 05:08, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is a note about it on the talk page.--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 17:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

The following articles Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Homer_E._Woodling were nominated for deletion. You are welcome to share your opinion on if they should be deleted or not. Thank you for your time. --SportsMaster (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

An article that you have been involved in editing, Greater Western Ohio Conference, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Conference. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? §hep • ¡Talk to me! 23:13, 3 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Cannabis (drug). Thank you. NJGW (talk) 19:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why the insertion of italian names into the instrument template? --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 01:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hm, looks to me like at least a couple of us think it should be discussed. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 16:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think the fact that no less than four seperate people disagreed with it means the consensus is against the addition of the names. A while back I may have even made a note on the Instruments project, and gone boldly reverting all the changes in the name of consensus...but now, I don't care. If you wanna ruin the NPOV of WP by adding all these names, and going against the MOS re: caps, be my guest. I did my part. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 16:09, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

It may be more useful to discuss this on the infobox talk page. __Just plain Bill (talk) 16:37, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

In response to your comment on my take talk page, that's simply not the case. In fifteen years of playing solos, chamber music, and band music, I have never, ever, not once, seen the word "eufonio" printed at the top of a page. Nor, in my extensive experience doing score study, is that true for any other instrument: our sheet music does not call a horn a "corno," nor a trumpet a "tromba," nor a bassoon a "fagotto." Unless, of course, you are in Italy. Which we are not.

Forgive me for being blunt, but your blanket assertion of "it's still very likely that when you pick up a sheet of music, the name of the instrument will be in Italian" simply does not correspond to reality. At all. Period. --NetherlandishYankee (talk) 22:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't correspond to my experience anyway. TheScotch (talk) 09:19, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rainbow Guts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Orange Mike | Talk 19:55, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! I have amended your edit to Kurta and posted my reasons on Talk:Kurta#Panjabi. Please reply there. Thanks! Fowler&fowler«Talk» 20:38, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I noticed your signature on this user talk page and noticed that your font spilled over into everything past it. I have since fixed it on that page, but you might want to add a </font> tag to the end of it in your preferences to fix it for good. Cheers, Valley2city^‽ 14:46, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've noticed that you changed the opening sentence of the Don Draper entry to read "Born Dick Whitman". I had previously changed the entry to read "also known as Richard Whitman" for a very specific reason. The phrase "Born Dick Whitman", "Born Norma Jean Baker" or any other such permutation in a Wikipedia article suggests that either the subjects name was changed legally or that the subject adapted a stage name or a professional name that they were known by.

In the case of the fictional character of 'Don Draper', this man is using the name of a dead man, and has not legally changed his name to Donald Draper, nor is he using the name simply for business uses.

In a real life case that is a parallel to Draper's story, Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter used the name 'Clark Rockefeller' and that is what the entry is entitled. However, the opening sentence is as follows: "Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter (born February 21, 1961) is a German con artist who went by the alias Clark Rockefeller." and not "Clark Rockefeller (born Christian Karl Gerhartsreiter).

To state "born Richard Whitman" at the opening of the Draper entry is deceptive, even though it is, by definition, factual.

I admit that my phrasing "also known as", while also accurate, does not flow well. If you can write a new sentence that takes into consideration the point I made, I think that would be a good compromise.

I do not want to engage in an edit war, and would greatly prefer that we come to a consensus about this.

If you have any questions, or comments please let me know. Thank You-(75.69.241.91 (talk) 22:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC))Reply

I recently removed the material you re-added here. This appears to be at best a trivial anecdote, and adds little value to the encyclopedia. At worst it is simply incorrect, or of such minor use that it misleads the reader. If this cannot be attributed to a reliable source, it should be removed. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 20:49, 2 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

As you seem to have been active since this was posted, but not replied to it, I'm going to assume that you've read it and declined to respond. Per my note above, I am removing this statement again. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I indeed replied, in the talk page for the article. If you had checked that, you would have seen. I will re-revert pending your reply in the appropriate forum -- the actual talk page for the article in question. Acsenray (talk) 17:07, 17 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you uploaded File:Tom Griffin in 1975 prototype Houston Astros uniform.jpg and File:Joe Niekro wearing the Rainbow Guts uniform.jpg but seem to have forgotten to provide the source and add the copyright tag to show their copyright status. Cheers ww2censor (talk) 04:21, 11 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

You edited the opening line of the Radio Caroline article, by totalling ignoring the written and quoted source, and replaced by an erroneous and distinctly political POV. This article has been subject to some harsh, and inaccurate editing recently, and it is only recently it has actually been settled and is in line with most published and quotable material. If you would like to make a positive contribution, it would be appreciated if some further, and documentable reference could be found for the US Fraud case referred to in the article. --Keith 18:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Acsenray! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 31 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Courtis Fuller - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Doug White - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Gary Cates - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Scott Nein - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Tom Atkins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Stan Aronoff - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Margie Planton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Anthony O. Calabrese Jr. - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. George Herbert Walker III - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Charles Levin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:18, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Charles L. Wolfe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable one time political candidate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kevin (talk) 01:13, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Haitian dollar. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Haitian gourde. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Haitian gourde - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Shashwat986 (talk) 22:12, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Frank Gaul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not look notable. Seems to fail WP:POLITICIAN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Scott Mac (Doc) 17:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Frank Gaul, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Gaul. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Scott Mac (Doc) 09:44, 12 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Margie Planton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Just being a mayor is not usually sufficient for WP:POLITICIAN and I haven't been able to find sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Edward S. Brown has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable local candidate

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lionel (talk) 22:16, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

A discussion has begun about whether the article Joe Sulzer, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Sulzer until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Cirt (talk) 12:25, 15 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Anthony J. Celebrezze III has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability concerns

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ϢereSpielChequers 00:31, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

The article Jeff Hardenbrook has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long-term unreferenced biography with no indication that the subject meets the criteria for notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 00:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for uploading File:Steering wheel logo - 2011 Dodge Avenger.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Armbrust ^{WrestleMania XXVII} _{Undertaker 19–0} 21:10, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

This notice was posted while I was composing the licensing informationAcsenray (talk) 21:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi Acsenray, I understand this is the French word for the English word Brand. Sixty or seventy years ago it was used for very particular brands of European cars, perhaps partly as a mark of excellence.
It seems to have been revived by some Wikipedia editors but used quite differently.
Does its new use simply mean brand or is there now an extra useage I am unaware of?
If it means no more than brand why is it being used? Thanks Eddaido (talk) 21:34, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your note. Can you back that up with any references? I'm told the revival of the word in Amercian English comes (obviously) from North American editors and I'm wondering what is special about it and why we should have it. Thanks. Eddaido (talk) 01:07, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect East Bengal (football club). Since you had some involvement with the East Bengal (football club) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Avenue X at Cicero (talk) 05:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Acsenray, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Guts whether the article Rainbow Guts should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving Rainbow Guts, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Orange Mike | Talk 02:07, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Ohio State Route 201, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mad River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Acsenray,

Back in December, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchuk wikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited The Kite Runner (film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Service station and Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hollywood Residential (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Starz

List of Hollywood Residential episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tom Arnold

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

The article Rick Carne has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability. Never held political office

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 13:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Three-dimensional space, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Werieth (talk) 19:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of colleges and universities in Ohio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• br />(Fenn College) || ''[http://www.csuohio.edu/class/com/clevelandstater/ The Cleveland Stater]]'' || [[WCSB]] 89.3 MHz ||   || [[Cleveland-Marshall College of Law]] || James J. Nance

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Election Results, Dayton, Ohio, Municipal Court Judge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Election Results, Dayton, Ohio, Municipal Court Judge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wizardman 17:52, 21 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Gomer Pyle, U.S.M.C. characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NCO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:36, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larry Householder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry Householder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 23:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Acsenray, you seem to have a lot to say about the plot He Died with a Felafel in His Hand, do you think you could review your contributions to this page to provide a more concise plot. At the moment, it does not appear to be in line with: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:How_to_write_a_plot_summary . Thanks Jabba in the pit (talk) 06:28, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

– nafSadh did say 04:03, 12 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

The article Dean Strausbaugh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Long under referenced, no significant claim to notability, and no significant outside secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 01:22, 15 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on William Burga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Dissident Aggressor 23:51, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article Robert Lucas (candidate) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

The article Sandy Cox has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable local politician.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:07, 6 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baidya, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ray and Mallik. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ed Emery (Ohio politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Emery (Ohio politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HangingCurve^{Swing for the fence} 03:35, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pat Geary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Geary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 19:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joel Hyatt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Hyatt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abner Orick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abner Orick until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edythe Lewis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edythe Lewis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 16:51, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike M. Liskany is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike M. Liskany until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Capizzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Capizzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dick Zimmer (Ohio politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dick Zimmer (Ohio politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:36, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Don L. Crawford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don L. Crawford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

The article Richard Zimmer (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not needed per WP:TWODABS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Jeff Seemann has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defeated political candidate.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 19:43, 3 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited J.Crew, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiegel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article James Metzenbaum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable politician.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. User:Namiba 12:16, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larry A. Kaczala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larry A. Kaczala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

You used incorrect spelling on the Montgomery County, Ohio article. You used "neighbouring". It's neighboring, not neighbouring. Ohio is in America. American spelling is to be used.—Bde1982 (talk) 17:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Theodore Roosevelt V is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theodore Roosevelt V until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. schetm (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bell pepper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chili.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 28 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article M. Herbert Hoover has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notable person who fails WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sahaib3005 (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Clarityfiend (talk) 18:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gruyère cheese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Generic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Curbon7 (talk) 14:30, 23 January 2023 (UTC)Reply