User talk:Ahrgrr
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:26, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Peugeot SK3
[edit]Bonjour, Ahrgrr.
Lorsque tu as regroupé les images de SK3 (merci pour ça, d'ailleurs), tu as mis ce modèle en tant que dérivé de la 402. Mais quand on lit le descriptif qu'il y a à côté du véhicule, les caractéristiques techniques du bestiau et la brochure Peugeot de 1938 (et plus particulièrement l'intro sur les utilitaires), on voit qu'il s'agirait plutôt d'un modèle à part bien qu'utilisant le moteur de la 302.
Sur quoi t'es-tu basé(e) pour le classer en tant que version de la 402 ? Dans le doute, ne faudrait-il pas plutôt rattacher directement la catégorie à Peugeot vans, avec un {{Cat see also}} en intro vers les catégories des 402 et 302 (et réciproquement) ? -- BarnCas (talk) 03:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour BarnCas,
- Je me suis basé sur l'article Wikipedia de la 402, paragraphe utilitaires :
Les utilitaires 402 s'appellent SK3 (cabine 402, moteur 302), SK4 (cabine 402, moteur 402), MK4 (cabine 402, moteur 402), MK5 (cabine 402 B, moteur 402 B) et DK5 (cabine 402 B, moteur 402 B, roues arrière jumelées)
L'info est sourcée, et je l'ai revue au détour de divers sites de passionnés. Personnellement j'associe plus une gamme à sa silhouette qu'à sa motorisation : une 402 à moteur de 302 me semble « de type 402 ». Mais si cette vision n'est pas si partagée que ça, ta proposition tient la route. Ahrgrr (talk) 10:17, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted content
[edit]
- use in any work, regardless of content
- creation of derivative works
- commercial use
- free distribution
See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.
Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.Yours sincerely, Guanaco (talk) 21:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Showgirls Deptford film club.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |