Fr.Latreille

Image Tagging Image:Veynes-Gap29.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Veynes-Gap29.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Fil nik 13:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:Voies-Estaque11.jpg

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 15:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Tubaire02.JPG

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 16:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Marseille-Pagnol81.jpg

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 22:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done -- Fr.Latreille 22:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Marseille-StJeanduDésert18.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Fil nik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 16:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Done -- Fr.Latreille 21:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour, et merci pour vos contributions. Votre image ou autre fichier multimédia a récemment été supprimé, en accord avec nos procédures et notre politique, car il ne rentrait pas dans le cadre du projet. Je vous invite à consulter la page des critères d'inclusion. En quelques mots, Commons est conçu pour héberger des fichiers : des photographies, des diagrammes, des animations, de la musique, du texte lu et des séquences vidéo. Wikimedia Commons ne contient pas d'écrits comme des articles encyclopédiques, des livres, des actualités, des définitions de mots, etc. Chacun de ces types de contenus est hébergé par un projet spécifique : Wikipédia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary et Wikiquote. Si votre contribution vous semble entrer dans le cadre de l'un de ces autres projets, n'hésitez pas à y contribuer pour l'y ajouter. Si vous pensez que la suppression de votre fichier ici était une erreur, car votre contribution respectait les critères d'inclusion, vous pouvez demander sa restauration sur la page Commons:Demandes de restauration, en indiquant la raison pour laquelle votre fichier entre dans le cadre du projet et pour aider les autres à évaluer la pertinence de votre requête. Merci pour votre compréhension.

abf /talk to me/ 22:24, 18 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Marseilleveyre-panneau22.JPG

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File deletion warning

File:Marseilleveyre-panneau22.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

82.229.4.29 17:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Copyright

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

De nombreuses images ajoutées ici sont des copyvio flagrants. Merci de faire attention au droit de copyright et d'auteur. Dionysostom (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Exemple : File:Marseille-Mazargues95d.JPG File:Marseille-St-Pierre-plan.jpg File:Marseille-Buzine61.jpg File:Marseille-Buzine64.jpg File:Marseille-Buzine62.jpg File:Marseille-Buzine63.jpg ainsi que la plupart des panneaux de quartiers de marseille (pas de fop et droit d'auteur applicable car réelle création ) Dionysostom (talk) 22:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Marseille-Mazargues95d.JPG

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Marseille-Mazargues95d.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dionysostom (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Marseille-St-Pierre-plan.jpg

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Marseille-St-Pierre-plan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Dionysostom (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Université-Saint-Charles20.jpg

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Université-Saint-Charles20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 00:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of mistakes

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You nominated Category:Churches_in_Muro_(Haute_Corse) for deletion (it has already been deleted), saying: "empty; created by mistake (a convenient category exists: Churches in Muro (Haute-Corse)." Just for future reference, when you've mistakenly created a category like that, you can use {{speedydelete|reason}}, which is much easier to use than the regular deletion process. - dcljr (talk)

Thanks very much. I'll try to do so in the future. - Fr.Latreille (talk) 19:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tip: Categorizing images

Latest comment: 12 years ago14 comments2 people in discussion

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Fr.Latreille!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Image:Eglise-Montluel-intérieur-59.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Eglise Montluel-53.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Chapelle Montluel-65.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Eglise-Montluel-intérieur-54.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Chapelle Montluel-66.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Eglise-Montluel-intérieur-55.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Eglise-Montluel-intérieur-57.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Eglise-Montluel-intérieur-58.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Eglise Montluel-façade-49.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Eglise Montluel-façade-50.jpg was uncategorized on 18 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Image:Notre-Dame de Bois-Vert-23d.jpg was uncategorized on 13 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Désolé : toutes ces images avaient été catégorisées le 18 septembre dans la demi-heure qui a suivi leur création. Il aurait été préférable de le vérifier avant de m'envoyer ce rappel à l'ordre... le lendemain ! - Fr.Latreille (talk) 15:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

+ 1 OK --Fr.Latreille (talk) 21:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Églises Saint-Claude par départements

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour,

Avantages de la création des catégories pour les églises par patron saint et par département sont nombreuses:

1. Facilité pour voir comment les églises sont réparties sur le territoire Français pour un patron saint

2. Pour un département facilité de voir quels sont les patrons saints représentés

3. Repartir le gros volume des églises en France pour les patrons fréquemment utilisés (Saint Jean, Saint Pierre, Saint Martin etc.)

Il est vrai, que l'inconvénient pour les patrons peu fréquents, est d'avoir peu d'églises réparties dans des nombreuses sous-catégories comme s'est le cas pour Saint-Claude. Mais, qui peut dire combien existe-t-il d'églises Saint-Claude en France sur 100 000 églises en tout? Une dizaine me paraît peu probable. La tâche difficile est de répartir à posteriori les églises par département comme la catégorie in France deviendra trop importante. Qui se chargera de la faire après?

J'ai privilégié une démarche homogène pour touts les patrons saints et en plus on peut toujours utiliser la template scan catégorie pour afficher l'ensemble des item de la catégorie mère. Pour l'instant j'ai décidé de ne plus remonter l'information sur les patrons saints des églises, plutôt que de le mettre sous la catégorie in France. --Moonik (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

J'avoue, ce n'est pas un sujet simple. Initialement l'idée d'utiliser le patron saint pour les églises d'un département devrais servir tout simplement à répartir un millier des églises mis en vrac dans une catégorie (pour moi indigeste), par une cinquantaine voir même centaine des patrons. J'ai réglé le problème des églises dont on ne connait pas le patron saint en ajoutant la catégorie Unidentified patron saint churches in ... et le problème des patron saint locaux ou exotiques en introduisant la catégorie Other patron saint churches in ... qui les regroupe sans distinction. Mais le problème des multiples saints du même nom n'est pas résolu et il est vraiment difficile à traiter par manque d'information. Les églises aux multiples patrons saints posent également le problème. Faut-il faire les intersections des patrons ou de les classer sous les patrons individuellement? Il sera bien de trouver un autre critère que les patrons saints pour classer les églises dans les départements. Personnellement, je suis à court d'idées sur ce sujet. Le critère architectural est encore bien plus complexe à mettre en ouvre (la même église représente souvent plusieurs styles architecturaux), mais certainement peut-être plus intéressent pour les lecteurs que les patrons saint. Pour l'instant le sujet reste en suspend. --Moonik (talk) 07:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Vierge de la Salette avec enfants (statuette).JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Fr.Latreille, where is this statue located (country, inside/outside of a building)? Who is the sculptor? When was it installed (year)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Ambel-église-statue-17.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Fr.Latreille, where is this statue located (country)? Who is the sculptor? When was it installed (year/century)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:Corps-médiathèque-91.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Fr.Latreille, where is this statue located (country)? Who is the sculptor/artist? When was it installed (year)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:La Fare05-Taix-57.JPG

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Fr.Latreille, who is the sculptor of this statue? When was it installed (year)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Barrage de Castillon (La Mongie)

Bonjour Latreille, un remerciement pour votre excellente remarque. J'ai corrigé et amélioré en créant la page wikipédia du barrage de Castillon à la Mongie. Voir en ligne :[1] Serge Ottaviani (User talk:Serge Ottaviani) 09:05, 29 Octobre 2013 (UTC)

File:Entre Volx et Forcalquier70.JPG

Bravo pour cette photo : désormais, il y a une route de rocade de Volx qui passe sur ce chemin. Elle est historique maintenant. (user:Azoee de fr:)

Image Berger 7 - NEUVILLE-SUR-SAONE - Terminus du Tramway

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Bonsoir,

Cette image est intéressante, mais son copyright me semble douteux. En effet le tram a été inauguré en 1932, donc la photo est au mieux de cette année-là (au pire de 1952), et rien ne permet d'affirmer que son auteur (connu ou inconnu) serait décédé avant 1944. Par défaut, la règle des 70 ans s'applique.

Cordialement, Fr.Latreille (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour,
Merci de votre alerte.
Je me suis pose la question également, mais j'ai estimé que la technique d'impression de cette carte postale était bien des années 1930, et pas de l'après-guerre, où on a des cartes postales en impression quadrichromique généralement brillantes et sans marge blanche.
Je pense qu'on peut attendre l'éventuelle protestation d'un ayant-droit pour supprimer immédiatement le cliché.
Qu'en pensez-vous ? Cordialement --Claude villetaneuse (talk) 06:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

File source is not properly indicated: File:Marseille-Pagnol87.jpg

Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marseille-Pagnol87.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Marseille-Pagnol87.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 08:45, 18 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Peu importe : la photo est de très mauvaise qualité (déjà noté), et DOIT être détruite pour ce motif.

No matter : the picture is too bad (still noticed), and MUST be deleted (yes, I am the author).

--Fr.Latreille (talk) 19:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Logo église orthodoxe.jpg

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Logo église orthodoxe.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--Krdbot 01:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Position of photo

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Fr.Latreille, merci for your foto File:Monument aux morts arméniens-Marseille-les Borels.JPG. Could you maybe add the GPS position of this object or even describe where exactly you found it? Merci, --Arnd (talk) 16:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

I don't have exact coords of it. It seems to be something as 43.3665284,5.3630482. The armenian church is located nearby the great arch bridge "Viaduc des Aygalades", at its eastern end ; access from croosing roads "Chemin de Saint-Antoine à Saint-Joseph", "Vallon des Tuves", "Boulevard du Bosphore", via alley "Traverse de l'église". All that between Saint-Antoine and Borels quarters, in 15th arrondissement of Marseille. Can you do with that? Truly yours, Fr.Latreille (talk) 14:47, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Fr.Latreille, it is hard for me to follow these roads. Could you please instead start from here, center the building which is the Armenian church, zoom in as much as possible and finally copy and send me the link. Thank you, --Arnd (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. I can't recognize it on the map. I just remember it is slightly on the right of the tag (1 or 2 cm). I should have to return there... Maybe... --Fr.Latreille (talk) 14:59, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

File:Monument-Solaro.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Monument-Solaro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

PierreB (talk) 09:29, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

File:Marseille-LesCamoins70.jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Marseille-LesCamoins70.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

90.43.38.116 21:45, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

File talk:TGV Duplex - Canal de Marseille (LGV Sud-Est, Bouches-du-Rhône, France).jpg

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour,
J'ai demander de renommer le fichier (et d'autres photos prisent à côté).
Merci de votre signalement, je me suis rendu compte que je faisait l'erreur au quotidient.
Cordialement,
Myst (talk) 14:07, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sinon, je me souviens avoir apprécié vos photos (quand j'étais actif). Merci de vos contributions à Commons. Myst (talk) 14:09, 21 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

In Marseille

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Bonjour, ces créations sont simplement la version marseillaise de centaines de catégories "... par ville" (Category:Categories of France by city), 536 actuellement et où j'avais constaté que notre ville accusait un retard abyssal qui faisait peine à voir. Par exemple, Category:Animals in Marseille répond à Category:Animals in France by city où s'y trouvait Paris, Lyon, Bordeaux etc et pas nous. Idem Category:Plaques in Marseille pour Category:Plaques in France by city. J'en ai créée 250 et à l'époque, il devait en exister que 100 donc aujourd'hui on en a 350 sur 536.

Vous pourrez constatez dans l'historique de ces photos que j'avais changé la catégorie "Marseille" en "Animal à Marseille" ou "Plaques à Marseille". Hyper logique quand les sous-catégories en questions existent/sont créées.

Sinon je me permet de vous informer que la catégorie Marseille Category:Marseille est une méta catégorie, autrement dit que dans l'absolu elle ne devrait contenir aucune photo. Ceci est écrit dans le bandeau bleu en haut de page "Dans la mesure du possible, les images doivent être déplacées dans la sous-catégorie la plus appropriée". --Maxéco (talk) 14:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Pour les archives, il y a Marseille (centrale) et Aix (annexe), cas apparemment unique/très rare en France d'avoir des archives dep dans deux villes. Le Département des Bouches-du-Rhône présente la particularité de posséder deux dépôts d’archives : un à Marseille, et un à Aix-en-Provence Cette annexe aixoise des archives départementales est située au cœur du quartier Sextius Mirabeau --Maxéco (talk) 11:04, 26 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bonsoir, si effectivement il y a une erreur sur castle/chateau, faites-moi signe le jour où il y aura un vote je vous soutiendrais dans votre démarche. Voir que peut-être le problème est plus global et que tous les castles de ville de France se trompent comme ceux de Marseille.

Sinon, comme toujours, vous êtes un top membre qui fait plein de bonnes photos, continuez, c'est super. --Maxéco (talk) 17:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

About the cateogries about the flag of France

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

What would you suggest me to do instead of many categories? Is there is an alternative way to categorize the flags of France by location or any categories I can keep? SpinnerLaserz (talk) 21:38, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Bonjour

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Désolé si je parle français, ceci concerne vos préoccupations concernant les catégories de drapeau français. En ce qui concerne les catégories de drapeau français, quelles catégories dois-je supprimer. Vous avez vraiment raison sur ces catégories. Après avoir réexaminé vos préoccupations qui m'ont été données, j'avais décidé de supprimer les catégories que vous souhaitez supprimer. J'ai également cessé d'éditer des images et de ne pas créer de catégories inutiles aux drapeaux. Je voudrais m'excuser pour l'énorme malentendu sur la catégorisation. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Highways Junction vs Highways Fork

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour

Comme j'essaie de l'expliquer ici, il y a pour moi une différence entre Highways Junction et Highways Fork.

Je viens de me rendre compte que vous avez transféré la photo A7 (jonction A9).JPG de la catégorie "A9-A7 Junction" vers "A9-A7 Fork". Mais, comme écrit en description, il s'agit bien de la jonction de l'A7 sur l'A9, et non de la séparation des 2 autoroutes (pour le sens des voies vue par la photo). Je me suis permis de rétablir la catégorie. Mais, bien sûr je peux me tromper. Discutons-en. --Poudou99 (talk) 17:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Rond-point

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Bonjour, vous avez de la chance car je constate que vous m'avez écris il y a 3 jours alors que cela doit faire 5 ou 6 mois que je ne m'étais pas connecté. À 3 jours près, vous auriez pu avoir une réponse que dans 6 mois et non aujourd'hui :) Sinon, il s'agît d'un rond-point pour accéder à la fac de Luminy qui était en travaux de rénovation à l'époque comme toute la route du rond-point de la Gineste jusqu'à la fac. Effectivement, la qualité des photos est médiocre car prise au portable et s'il faut en supprimer certaines, que cela se fasse. J'espère que vous téléchargez toujours autant de photos des quartiers de notre ville et je vous souhaite une bonne continuation.--Maxéco (talk) 16:04, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Le Baou-Roux.jpg

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

{{User:Deletion Notification Bot/SDEL/headingless|1=File:Le Baou-Roux.jpg|2=Book cover under copyright. --User:CptKeyes CptKeyes ([[User talk:CptKeyes talk

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : CptKeyes.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

File:La Viste, tour 1.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:La Viste, tour 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:La Viste, tour 2.jpg

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:La Viste, tour 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

File:Caro-Ricoré 1.jpg

Latest comment: 16 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Caro-Ricoré 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 06:09, 1 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic