Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Your Coffee Cups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Should anyone wish to merge any of the content elsewhere please let me know. Michig (talk) 06:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Coffee Cups

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Webpage is already gone. Seems to have been spam. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 00:00, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 7. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 00:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable defunct cafe —Мандичка^YO 😜 03:03, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It looks like it got some coverage when it first opened, but not really any after that point. (Although given the amount of media outlets that love commenting on owners posting nasty comments on Yelp, I'm surprised that these comments to some of the customers didn't gain some attention.) In any case, the coverage it did receive isn't enough to pass notability guidelines as a whole and given that it's since closed down, it's unlikely to gain any more. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:42, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches found nothing significant and notable and it seems they're best known for the sexual controversy. SwisterTwister talk 04:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Deletefor the reasons given above. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 20:08, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Any coverage is one event type stuff. Nwlaw63 (talk) 19:14, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Selective merge to Bikini barista § Growth outside Seattle. I'm surprised this option has not been considered. The Bikini barista article presently has no content about this, and content in the article is certainly verifiable (e.g. [1], [2]). Per the many delete !votes above, though, this may not occur. If so, then that's the way it goes. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:31, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.