Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Romance-speaking Asia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:21, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Romance-speaking Asia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research. "Romance-speaking Asia" returns only Wikipedia and Wikipedia mirrors. It's not a natural search term and the article duplicates content from the main Romance languages article and various others, a lot of which has simply been copy and pasted. No evidence that "Romance-speaking Asia" is a topic in its own right. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 16:17, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to be WP:SYNTHESIS. Pburka (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 18:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. CThomas³ (talk) 18:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a usual term. This is especially true because the prevalence of French usage in Vietnam and neighboring countries is nothing nearly as large as in the so-called "Francophone Africa".John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:28, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above. power~enwiki (π, ν) 22:58, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete original researchHariboneagle927 (talk) 02:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.