Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PzKpfw LXVIII Super Tiger
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 05:58, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- PzKpfw LXVIII Super Tiger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Article about a a fictional tank that someone made inside a video game (the article is written by the guy who designed the tank). It's "a tank I created one day". In no way shape or form notable and the only source is an IM chat. Cameron Scott (talk) 01:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. There's no evidence provided that this meets WP:N. Nick Dowling (talk) 01:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I'm speechless at how inherently nn this is. No possibility of reliable sources providing substantive coverage. gnfnrf (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for all the reasons stated above and on the article's Talk page--and much respect to Cameron Scott for his patience. Drmies (talk) 03:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This article belongs somewhere, but not on Wikipedia. It lacks “notability” and “reliable” sourcing. —SlamDiego←T 04:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing much to say has it fails various Wikipedia policy one good example is Notability. --SkyWalker (talk) 08:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 14:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pretty much per nom. I am also trying to help out the creator by pointing to the appropriate guidelines and policies. MuZemike (talk) 16:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even without the numerous tags, it's obvious this article has several problems. Cutting some slack in the sourcing area, notability is still a killer here.--Koji† 22:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:SNOW Delete: Totally non-notable. Schuym1 (talk) 22:38, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Send in the tigers? I'll get me coat. --Cameron Scott (talk) 22:42, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. JBsupreme (talk) 02:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.