Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Noskowiak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 06:19, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Noskowiak

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He has not played a game for the Cyclones. Does not appear to be a high school prospect with sufficient sources to pass GNG a la Diamond Stone. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 00:43, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Noskowiak is an ESPN Top 100 recruit and ranked as a top 15 guard in the country. He was heavily recruited by power five schools and landed at a pre-season top 5 Iowa State program. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.33.112.137 (talk) 04:01, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: WP:CRYSTALBALL: There are loads of agencies, magazines, and others that exist to create lists of "top recruits," "top position players," and the like. As an ACC fan, I know: everyone has the best recruiting class in history, and, if they don't, they have a "diaper dandy" or something similar. Wikipedia standards are not based on such fevers. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:11, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Rikster2 (talk) 14:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON; adopt @Rikster2 rationale. Quis separabit? 15:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.