Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/My Occurrence
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- My Occurrence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is just another poorly written episode article that is mainly plot with a small review section. These kind of articles might have been good 10 years ago, but new episode articles should need more to them than just a review section. Gonnym (talk) 21:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but you deleted half an article and then restored redirect saying it's mostly has plot.
- The episode is often cited among the best Scrubs (TV) episodes, it has significant coverage.
- "mainly plot with a small review section" - three paragraphs of plot, three paragraphs of reception. BilboBeggins (talk) 10:44, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Scrubs season 1#ep22. I'm usually in favor of keeping articles with only reviews as secondary coverage, but a single review in The A.V. Club and brief mentions in listicles such as IGN isn't enough. (This doesn't count as a significant review – my general rule of thumb is that sites or authors should have their own article to provide a significant review.) A redirect is best as episode titles are reasonable search terms. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:17, 4 December 2024 (UTC)