Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Teavee Song
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep or merge with Mike Teavee. This one will need some formatting before it can be merged without making the Mike Teavee article look like a dump, so I will add a merge tag instead of merging this myself. Sjakkalle (Check!) 14:27, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Nothing worth keeping in this article. It's practically dicdef.Dave 03:13, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:16, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- comment It's practically blanked because it used to be a big ol' copyvio of the song lyrics from Dahl's book. Joyous | Talk 15:56, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or delete Keep it or if no one edits it then delete it, try to redirect. —preceding unsigned comment by 69.118.130.88 (talk • contribs) 19:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC) who is the author of the article][reply]
- delete or expand If it can't be expanded with anything worth noting then delete it. Or maybe make a page for all of the childrens songs on one page- I don't know why you would want to, but it is an option.
- comment Hmm, I do like the idea of creating one page for the bad childrens' songs.- JustPhil 13:16, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think now it is better since it does not have the long copyrighted lyrics, though it still needs some work.- JustPhil 17:44, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Merge to Mike Teavee. Now, I doubt it will get any better.- JustPhil 01:32, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to the movie page. Stifle 00:01, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - wonderful song, notable song, notable movie, notable book. What more do you want? Zordrac 11:41, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- A wonderful article would be nice. Mike Teavee is well on the way to becoming one. I think the current iteration of Mike Teavee Song has exhausted its potential. Merge. —Cryptic (talk) 20:39, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep this page and put the lyrice to the song. 17.255.240.2 23:19, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.