Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilimar Hernandez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 13:09, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lilimar Hernandez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD deleted. Not a notable actor. Fails WP:NACTOR as does not have significant roles in multiple notable productions. ~~WP:GNG as no significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject – only reference is a WP:SPS written by the subject.~~ Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but it's not a self-published source, that's the image caption. I found the actual author of the article (Madeleine Marr) at the bottom. nyuszika7h (talk) 14:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Opps, I missed that, I got fixated on the twitter link. That is a good reference and is non-trivial coverage so works towards WP:GNG, need more like it as GNG says: "multiple sources are generally expected". WP:NACTOR is a bit more problematic. Likely WP:TOOSOON as needs to do more as a actor. Geraldo Perez (talk) 14:48, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Also note Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lilimar was an AfD for the same person closed as delete. This article is eligible for speedy G4 as essentially a recreation of that article under a different name. Lilimar has been creation protected because of multiple G4 speed deletions - I tried to add a redirect to here from there and couldn't. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – as per previous AfD (and this doesn't seem to be enough of an improvement over the previous deleted version...), per the article citing only one reliable source, and per the subject's failing WP:NACTOR for having only one "significant" role. This definitely seems like a WP:TOOSOON case, and this article can be draftified/userfied to incubate in the meantime. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:22, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 16:24, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment may pass criteria 2 of WP:NACTOR of having significant fanbase, as appeared in all 40 episodes of Bella and the Bulldogs children's tv series shown worldwide. More important is RS for WP:GNG one in article, more.neededAtlantic306 (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Found a Spanish-language source with more info: http://la.eonline.com/venezuela/2015/conoce-a-lilimar-hernandez-la-actriz-venezolana-que-esta-causando-sensacion-en-la-tv-estadounidense-fotos/ – nyuszika7h (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as coverage in Miami Herald, the Spanish article above, also won award [1] and this [2] , I think she just passes WP:BASIC Atlantic306 (talk) 00:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I am persuaded by the improvements in the article since I nominated it for deletion that it passes the threshold of notability in WP:GNG. As this article was deleted per a previous AfD and has been salted under its original name, I think it important for this AfD to proceed to its normal conclusion and be formally closed to either support or override the original AfD. Because of that I consider it best to not withdraw my nomination. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:27, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.