Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightholder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh 00:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:N, sources are questionable. Surname articles are supposed to be used for disambiguation; but in this case, Wikipedia doesn't have an entry for a person of this name. The article rather contains extensive details about the history of the name. The only traceable source is a privately published book, which probably goes under WP:SPS. I can't help the impression that somebody is publishing her original research here. -- Sent here as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 15:18, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete unless sources are found to back this up Corpx 04:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, Wikipedia is not a geneaology resource. There is no claim to notability and there are no independent, reliable sources. Nuttah68 10:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and Corpx. --Aarktica 23:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.