Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Gribble
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of characters in King of the Hill. The article has been redirected; knowledgeable editors are encouraged to merge relevant, verified information. seresin ( ¡? ) 20:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Joseph Gribble (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This character does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 01:24, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to List of characters in King of the Hill. Not notable enough for his own article, but still notable enough to be mentioned. DARTH PANDAtalk 05:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect as per Darth Panda. References can be found for who voiced the character and merging would allow for removal of extrenuous info. - Mgm|(talk) 10:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per everyone. JuJube (talk) 20:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as this article establishes independent notability. With coverage in reliable third party sources, it is made up of necessary plot summary and unoriginal research. There is no reason presented as to how this article can never be improved. Plus boilerplate nominations feel rather bot-like and indiscriminate. --63.3.1.2 (talk) 16:18, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. How exactly is this independent from the article and where are the third party sources you mentioned? DARTH PANDAduel 18:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.