Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Hill (footballer, born 2003)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Hill (footballer, born 2003)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a soccer player who plays for a team in the sixth tier of England's soccer league structure. He fails WP:NSPORT and I am unable to find coverage that suggests he would pass WP:NBASIC despite a thorough online search. As such, I believe him to be non-notable and I propose that this article be deleted. — Mhawk10 (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable player. Playing in a FA Trophy match doesn't automatically make players notable, they still need the game to be played between two fully professional teams. No sources that can be added to meet WP:GNG.— NZFC^(talk)^(cont) 21:57, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 05:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom. Govvy (talk) 09:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, lack significant coverage and only played in the lower rungs of non-professional football.--Mvqr (talk) 12:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clear cut failure of GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 20:38, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NFOOTBALL has been discarded this week, leaving us with other choices like WP:NSPORT. I don't see this article passing NSPORT, and probably would not have passed NFOOTBALL if it was still around, so Delete. Jacona (talk) 10:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - 5 games at non-league level in England is not going to give someone the kind of notability that would be required for them to have an article. Dunarc (talk) 19:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.