Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daryl Robson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daryl Robson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets neither GNG or NFOOTY having never played in a fully professional league. I can't find any significant coverage. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 22:30, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:57, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:56, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:00, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – as per nom, clearly fails GNG and NFOOTY. I did manage to find the details of his one goal for Indiana Invaders though, incredibly enough considering the otherwise lack of coverage for his career. Keskkonnakaitse (talk) 02:35, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY Juggyevil (talk) 07:38, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I think there was some debate when the article was created whether the US Premier Development League was fully professional but it doesn't appear to have ever been. --Jimbo^[online] 15:33, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Couldn't find any WP:SIGCOV that would indicate the subject warrants a standalone article. GauchoDude (talk) 13:45, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.