Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Country Gold Weekend
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Country Gold Weekend (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No reliable sources given or found to establish notability according to WP:N or WP:GNG. The only reference given appears to be a press release, and the only futonable source found was another press release. It's fairly likely this article was created by Mr. Keller himself; even with WP:AGF it's not possible for this article to become encyclopedic. tedder (talk) 19:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree -- Matthew Glennon (T/C\D) 19:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Very weak keep The aforementioned press release did start from a legit news story. One article in a local paper is a bit thin, but maybe there is more? --Esprqii (talk) 19:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as article is now referenced by multiple citations to reliable third-party sources, subject is a nationally syndicated radio show (not merely a local program), and a motivated editor should be able to dig several more reliable sources out of the 32,100 Google hits for 'Keller "Back Porch Show"' (this program's previous name). - Dravecky (talk) 10:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Week Keep Only marginally notable. SYSS Mouse (talk) 23:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.