Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Sharp (ice hockey)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:02, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Sharp (ice hockey)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 13:12, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks the coverage needed for WP:GNG. He played for an Elite Ice Hockey League team. That alone doesn't satisfy WP:NHOCKEY criteria #4. Gab4gab (talk) 19:03, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 08:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:23, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Lacks any indepth coverage: only a few mentions in articles. As such, fails WP:GNG; also fails more specific articles --Hazarasp (talk) 11:59, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Found very little actual coverage on Andrew Sharp the hockey player, but there is apparently a hockey writer for Sports Illustrated by the same name. Either way, very little coverage any case and drastically fails NHOCKEY. Yosemiter (talk) 20:52, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.