Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amara Konate (Guinean footballer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 23:46, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Amara Konate (Guinean footballer)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Footballer lacking in sufficient secondary source coverage for notability. There is an article on a local sports blog and routine game coverage from a website dedicated to covering local sports teams (like [1]). agtx 19:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. agtx 19:36, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Africa. Shellwood (talk) 20:01, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 18:49, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - plenty of coverage out there from a very quick Google search, the following all from 'Amara Konate Perugia' on news - 1, 2, 3. Giant Snowman 18:52, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as mentioned above, there is plenty of non-trivial coverage on the subject. [2] [3] [4] [5] if you want something more than just a transfer announcement and with a little more context about the subject's personal life as well, and I literally found these in less than a minute... --Angelo (talk) 23:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clearly passes GNG.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:30, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:GNG with sources found, which makes me question whether a WP:BEFORE was done or if people are just trying to use AFD as a cleanup process again. Joseph2302 (talk) 23:02, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.