Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Brief Inquiry into Online Relationships
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to The 1975. Withdrawn by nominator. A request to have the page "locked" can be made at WP:RFPP. (non-admin closure) The editor whose username is Z0 16:51, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- A Brief Inquiry into Online Relationships (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. We do not need an article for an album where very little is known about it save the name and a few possible tracks. A case of WP:TOOSOON. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 05:21, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 05:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Keep. Good grief, just let the article snowball, or redirect to the artist's article if needed. There's no point in deleting the page altogether when the redirect serves a purpose. ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:11, 13 July 2018 (UTC)- We do not create articles for subjects that may one day be notable. Good grief indeed. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- I understand your position. I also think redirecting is better than wasting editors' time discussing deletion of articles that are just going to be recreated in a few weeks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:46, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm fine with a locked redirect. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: Ok, then consider withdrawing this nomination? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- As soon as it's a locked redirect. Right now, it fails any notability criteria. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- The page cannot be redirected while an AfD is in progress. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:00, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- So change your !vote to redirect and I'll withdraw on that condition. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- Redirect because the page serves a purpose. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- So change your !vote to redirect and I'll withdraw on that condition. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- The page cannot be redirected while an AfD is in progress. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:00, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- As soon as it's a locked redirect. Right now, it fails any notability criteria. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Walter Görlitz: Ok, then consider withdrawing this nomination? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:55, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- I'm fine with a locked redirect. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:50, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- I understand your position. I also think redirecting is better than wasting editors' time discussing deletion of articles that are just going to be recreated in a few weeks. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:46, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- We do not create articles for subjects that may one day be notable. Good grief indeed. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:14, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Nomination withdrawn assuming it will be redirected and locked. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:16, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.