User talk:Windermere06

Welcome!

See my archives for discussions that happened in 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.

I noticed you added a charter section for CYQB. While i agree with airlines like Hydro and Nolinor, that qualify as being charter airlines (i.e you cant book a flight on those aircraft without a private arrangement made with the airline beforehand), I'm wondering if Transat and Sunwing are truly operating charter flights to the Caribbean or the States, since most of those flights can be booked by yourself or I through the internet, therefore are scheduled in advance, and therefore are no different than an Air Canada or WestJet flight down south. Just because these airlines are known as "charter airlines", in my opinion, doesn't make (all) the flights they operate charter flights.

Thenoflyzone (talk) 05:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I just separated the charter airlines from the scheduled ones as I was just trying to put it in line with other airport articles I've seen. I'm not sure which flights operate as "scheduled" and which as "charter". Feel free to correct my changes. Thankyoubaby (talk) 02:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Thankyoubaby! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Paul Boyd (director) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:03, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know the protocol is not to list direct services if it involves a stop at a hub. I agree 100%. Therefore, I have no problem removing YYC as a Westjet destination from the YQB page, but for the sake of consistency, that means i have to remove Brussels and Geneva from AC's destination list on the YYZ airport page as well, since both those cities are served with same plane one stop service via YUL (which is an AC hub). What do you think?

Thenoflyzone (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheWomanInMeVideo.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:39, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thankyoubaby seeing that you are a part of the Janet Jackson WikiProject, I just wanted your input on this discussion, Thanks! Ga Be 19 04:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• “Nasty” and “Rhythm Nation” were given the full treatment, but the rest of her hits were performed as medleys. Omaha World-Herald
• Her show on Wednesday was a strange mix of hit-packed medleys and awkward, drawn-out photo/video montages. [...] The concert started strong — though 55 minutes after its advertised start time of 8 p.m. — with a “The Pleasure Principle”-”Control”-”What Have You Done For Me Lately”-”Feedback” medley. [...] Her second medley started out in a lull with “You Want This,” but quickly got the blood moving with “Alright,” “Miss You Much” and “Nasty.” [...] Another medley followed — this time the ballads, a “Nothing”-”Come Back to Me”-”Let’s Wait Awhile”-”Again” whopper. Reverb
• She finished off the first medley set with “What Have You Done For Me Lately?” and Discipline’s “Feedback, [...] And the choreography couldn’t be more electrifying than during the show’s next to last medley which included “Black Cat,” “If,” “Scream,” with MJ tribute, and “Rhythm Nation.” The Roundtable

It is unanimous in all reviews for the tour, the show is a series of medleys albeit "Pleasure Principle", "That's The Way Love Goes", "I Get Lonely" and "Black Cat". This means that "All Nite" is a part of a medley. All of the sources are listed within the article itself. Your edits have been reverted for this reason. Itsbydesign (talk) 11:48, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enjoy (Janet Jackson song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enjoy (Janet Jackson song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fixer23 (talk) 22:55, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do NOT continue reverting if you cannot provide reliable source. Its perfectly sourced in both articles that Fame Ball was a hardly a concert tour most of the times and Monster Ball was debut "headlining" tour. There have already been discussions in the talk page regarding this so don't change unless you want to be reported for WP:3RR. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 03:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thankyoubaby. I've noticed that you have taken a step in the Dispute Resolution Process by making a request at WP:WQA Please note that it is recommended that you advise the other party of your request so that they are aware of it, and so that they have a chance to participate.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Gerardw (talk) 10:20, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your user name, I've presumed you created this map. It is a better looking map than the previous map. However, and I'm unsure you've noticed, it has resulted in the correct geographic coordinate points to appear in the incorrect locations within the various articles that link to this file. Do you know how to resolve? Hwy43 (talk) 04:41, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did create that map, I tried correcting the coordinates at Template:Location map Canada Edmonton, but they still seem askew, and I'm not sure why. I'm fairly certain my coordinates are correct. Thankyoubaby (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your coordinates match mine to two seconds of lat/long or less. Any ideas who to consult with to resolve? Hwy43 (talk) 05:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We could ask User:117Avenue, if not, we may have to revert to that awful outdated map. Thankyoubaby (talk) 06:11, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and User:Qyd would be ideal, but I think he's gone from semi-retired to permanent. Hwy43 (talk) 13:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have resolved the problem. I had to change the coordinates on the template and the doc page. I checked a couple pages, the coordinates seem correct now. Thankyoubaby (talk) 19:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into this. I haven't checked more than a couple pages myself. I'll advise should I notice anything in the future. Hwy43 (talk) 04:50, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not random; 147 is exactly how many there are. There's no value in applying an arbitrary cutoff like "top 125" which would exclude the other 22 just for happening to fall below that arbitrary rank; as an encyclopedia we need to list however many there are to list, whether that's a "random" number or not. Bearcat (talk) 05:28, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are two airports in Montreal that handle scheduled passenger traffic, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports#Listing Montreal as a destination. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 10:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Moran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Moran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The Banner _talk 18:00, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ETS Capital Line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 117Avenue (talk) 01:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Miflaw2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:27, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your comment in an edit summary at Stadium LRT Station, I checked out a few London Tube station articles. Many that I saw were of the station's front door, not of the used part of that station. Is that how you feel? I think that a train station platform is what makes it a train station. So when I went to take pictures that were needed around Edmonton, I took pictures of the platforms. I know that I am not a great photographer, none of my files have been featured, and some amazing images have been uploaded, cough, cough. I'm not trying to push my own images, I want an image that best represents each station at the top of each article. I hope you feel that same. 117Avenue (talk) 02:31, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question at Edmonton LRT, reference 9. By the way could you update File:Future Edmonton LRT.png with the name of the city centre station, Blatchford? Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 06:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Griesbach too. Thankyoubaby (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From Gingeroscar

Could you put it back up? Aren't there more LRT routes around the world in the planning phase, and they have pages? I worked hard on the Valley Line. I am very disappointed the page cannot be found anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingeroscar (talk • contribs) 05:22, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From Gingeroscar Thanks for improving the metro line article. Could you add a system map, plus the 8 other stations that go to campbell road and replace northwest LRT future with St Albert LRT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingeroscar (talk • contribs) 23:44, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Soexcitedcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:35, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit. [1]. Yes, it is different. Just read the source below, which was added by me to Qantas today.

• Schofield, Adrian (12 September 2014). "Qantas expands Canadian access with WestJet deal". Air Transport World. Archived 12 September 2014 at the Wayback Machine

--Jetstreamer ^Talk 00:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I fully realize WestJet does not place its code on Qantas flights, and as I indicated, it does not place its code on the other carriers listed such as BA or CX, however WestJet still considers them code share partners.[2] Alaska Airlines is the same way. Thankyoubaby (talk) 07:04, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that an airline should be included as a codeshare partner only if the primary carrier places its code on services flown by the secondary one, according to WP:AIRLINE-CODESHARE. That's why QF shouldn't be listed as a codeshare partner for WS, even when the latter considers it is. Cheers.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 15:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIRLINE-CODESHARE says nothing of the sort. Thankyoubaby (talk) 16:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're right; I mistook it for WP:AIRLINE-DEST-LIST suggesting not to list codeshared destinations for the secondary carrier. In this case I don't see why QF cannot be listed as a codeshare partner at the WS article.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 17:00, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Be Stupid (You Know I Love You) (Shania Twain single - European cover art).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if you look at the history you will see all of the vandalism. That's why the page has been protected.  — Calvin999 08:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the mix-up with Fox Two, I was thinking about Ultima. However, I must disagree with you about listing every concert and event at a concert venue. If that was done for Rexall Place, it would be a long trivial list. Only notable events should be mentioned. 117Avenue (talk) 02:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care if you find an article calling it Enbridge Centre, Kelly Ramsey Tower, Kelly Ramsey building, or Kelly Ramsey Building. I saw the hole, Kelly Ramsey Building was demolished. Why do you want to link Enbridge Centre to an article about a demolished building? 117Avenue (talk) 19:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What "you saw" is irrelevant, that's not how Wikipedia works. Provide a source that says they are two different buildings. The CBC source I quoted clearly states "The Enbridge Centre, formerly the Kelly Ramsey building, officially opened Thursday." Thankyoubaby (talk) 00:21, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It also says the "tower incorporates the brickwork from the facades of the original Kelly and James Ramsey buildings". The Edmonton Journal says "the 28-storey tower was built on the site of the historic Kelly Ramsey Building", and that "the family name still inscribed on the new building." Global News says that "the old Kelly Ramsey Building was taken down, brick by brick," and that they "would later make up the new tower". CBC News says that "the building was demolished to make room for a planned 25-storey office tower." The Edmonton Sun says that "wrecking balls descended on the Kelly Ramsey block, making way for the city's second new office tower in 23 years." Enbridge Centre calls it "Edmonton’s first new Financial District Tower in 25 years." Skyscraper.com says construction started in 2013, Emporis says in 2014. It is clear that the old building was torn down, and that a new tower replaced it. If you think Enbridge Centre is notable enough for an article, make one, I've already created the Wikidata item. 117Avenue (talk) 02:53, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The old building was rebuilt with a tower on top. I still don't see why you think the new building shouldn't link to the old one, they're related closely enough. But this is so trivial I'm not going to pursue it anymore. Thankyoubaby (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, a 28-storey tower could not have been built on top of a hundred year old brick building. If you would read my quotes again, the old brick facade was placed on the front of a new building. A new building of steel structure, with 5 stories underground, and a completely different floor plan on the main floor. You're not linking the new building to the old one, your're hiding a link to the old one, as a link to a 363 foot building completed in 2016. I don't think they are closely related, as a brick facade is not part of a building's structure, at all. 117Avenue (talk) 19:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

After taking another look at List of tallest buildings in Edmonton, I see there are other buildings linked to articles that aren't about the building. 117Avenue (talk) 02:32, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Janet call on me cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Thankyoubaby, thanks for creating Avonmore station!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs more refs.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Thankyoubaby, thanks for creating Holyrood station!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs more than 1 source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Thankyoubaby, thanks for creating Grey Nuns station!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This needs more than 1 reference.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The AfD made it clear WP:NTOUR was not met. That was "Concert tours are probably notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Such coverage might show notability in terms of artistic approach, financial success, relationship to audience, or other such terms. Sources that merely establish that a tour happened are not sufficient to demonstrate notability. Tours that cannot be sufficiently referenced in secondary sources should be covered in a section on the artist's page rather than creating a dedicated article. A tour that meets notability standards does not make all tours associated with that artist notable. Michael Jackson's 1988 Bad is an example of a notable concert tour." So until that makes it into the article, leave the tag. It's not worth going through an AfD so soon after it was closed as no consensus. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:43, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing on that article that needs additional references. In fact your behaviour is text book disruptive, please familiarize yourself with point 3 on WP:DISRUPTSIGNS. Thankyoubaby (talk) 04:48, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please decide where you want to discuss this. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:02, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now that the ANI entry has been closed, please allow me to formally apologize for my rude behaviour in this matter. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:53, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shania Twain Now Tour Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:15, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyoubaby you have to be honest to the Wikipedia readers there is the link for 2017 data, this is the link,^[1]2017 Actual Compared to 2016 Actual ,you dont just come and delete everything you want

@68.151.34.31: Yes, and you'll notice, they haven't posted the December data. Thankyoubaby (talk) 00:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Shania Twain - Honey, I'm Home.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:21, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of events held at Rogers Place is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of events held at Rogers Place until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:15, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Edmonton International Airport, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you.

Andrewgprout (talk) 08:22, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You asked if WestJet's website includes the start date, and it does. Thankyoubaby (talk) 17:34, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada is approaching its third-anniversary. Please consider submitting any Canada-related articles you have created or improved since November 2016. Please try to ensure that all entries are sourced with formatted citations and have no unsourced claims.

You may use the above button to submit entries, or bookmark this link for convenience. For more information, please see WP:CAN10K. Thank-you, and please spread the word to those you know who might be interested in joining this effort to improve the quality of Canada-related articles. – Reidgreg (talk) 21:06, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Just replying to your revert of my edit] on Edmonton International Airport. I couldn't find a guideline on how to do destination lists, but the Edmonton-Yellowknife-Norman Wells-Inuvik and Edmonton-Yellowknife-Rankin Inlet-Iqaluit flights have keep the same flight numbers past Yellowknife and do not involve changes in aircraft (northbound passengers do not even have to get off the plane). These flights are generally listed as having all of their destinations (see YEG's departure list. Does the fact that it passes through a hub change this? Samuell ^{Lift me up} or _{put me down} 03:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Samuell:,

Per point 7 on WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT, "avoid listing direct flights that contain a stop at a domestic hub". As Yellowknife is the hub for Canadian North, everything else shouldn't be included. Thankyoubaby (talk) 04:18, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian Prairies census metropolitan areas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 02:53, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]