User talk:Niteshift36

Apologies I'm not tech-savvy. And probably acted out of emotion

Thank you for your edit, but it appears to be a huge “political” story that trended on every media outlet on the planet because the politician and his ex were divorced over politics. It is the issue the subject is most known for. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monologuebaby (talk • contribs) 03:21, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• "Every media outlet on the planet"? Seriously? You honestly expect anyone to take that claim seriously? Niteshift36 (talk) 16:25, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Wikiwings
		For extraordinary contributions to Aircraft in fiction, thus improving hundreds of aircraft type articles along the way! - Ahunt (talk) 15:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar may be awarded to those that show a pattern of going the extra mile to be nice, without being asked. This barnstar is awarded to User:Niteshift36, for his dedication to compromise and his ability to work with other editors to come up with amicable solutions which satisfy everyone. Thank you for your valiant efforts to the project. Ikip (talk) 02:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, Niteshift--I was happy to back you up there (that was easy anyway, since you were right). Man, some people need to get out more, so they don't have so many words left when they get here. Cheers! Drmies (talk) 22:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, fine by me. Let's move on. ~ Kimelea (talk) 21:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just from another editor who works on Florida articles. ...William 00:01, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	You are courageous. MONGO 03:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More beer! Drmies (talk) 05:18, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Who doesn't love free beer. :) Niteshift36 (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Tell you what, I had the opposite happen tonight. Old neighbor comes by, there's a bottle of champagne, she and Mrs. Drmies claim to be tired etc; by the time they're gone and I'm thinking about finishing that bottle, it's empty after all. Plus they were disrespecting the Clint Eastwood movie I was watching, tsk tsk. Also, I made a promise: to not respond at ANI. Hey, we're all buddy-buddy now, with all this stuff going on, but weren't we in a fight a couple of months ago? Where you were wrong, of course. Later! Drmies (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	For working with me on Dave Aronberg article. You've supported him, I was dead set against his most recent bid for office, but we worked together to make the article encyclopedic rather than looking like a press release. ...William 17:45, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:15, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

Hi, Niteshift - i have a problem and could use your help. My husband is Kermit Alexander and we have been trying to update his page to be more relevant and approachable. All the edits I have been making seem to become undone. Pictures from our personal files seem to be deleted. I am so technically challenged so I become frustrated after reading hours and hours of how-tos just to be dismissed. So how can you and I become friends that you will contribute to Kermit Alexander's? He worked really hard to become an author and now I'm stumpted on how to tell the world about his efforts. Hanna33 (talk) 23:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this is a heads-up: CrazyAces was blocked for six months on his original account and an IP account (see User talk:173.52.99.208) for one month. If you find another account which resembles him, he is evading a block and should be taken to ANI. Sorry to bother you with this, but you know his habits as much as I do.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:14, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• I caught up on that when I saw the block on his talk page (I have it watch listed). Always something with him. Niteshift36 (talk) 01:37, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay good. He mentioned another account used since February 2016. It must still exist somewhere but I haven't found any user which resembles his "style". I'm not going to get too search too deep because he always seems to make a scene at some point or another.

Update: The account was/is User:BlackAmerican, at least I safely can say so by comparing editing styles. I contacted Bishonen about it and am waiting for a response. Another big.clean-up will be underway because I have seen handfuls of bare links and unnotable subjects.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Be advised, it seems you have been mentioned in an off-wiki article [1].--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, someone is pretty literal. You have to love a troll that doesn't allow anyone to comment or correct his errors. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After reading that article, I'll bet the author's mommy still cuts his meat for him.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Lol. Quite possibly. He actually thinks I claim to be an actual Jedi. Niteshift36 (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Niteshift36. I've seen you editing recently and you seem knowledgeable about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 17:45, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello it's been awhile since I've been on here. Although, we've come into contact through Wikipedia gang related articles. While we have had disputes over handling of race issues which I am very socially liberal about, I apologize for coming at you hostile. We need to be allies in order to make things work. There are bigger political issues on Wikipedia and I think you know what I'm talking about. There are Wikipedians who don't value freedom of speech or freedom of information, and I honestly wouldn't doubt that they are being payed off this very moment. While we disagree on some points, we both have something in common: a love for the Constitution, accuracy, and presentation of facts. There is few of us here on Wikipedia and we are outnumbered. Neutral point of view, lack of COI, and accuracy of information needs to be kept alive here. [qub/x q;o++a] ++ 03:36, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you're famous, just thought you should know. Cheers. - ^theWOLFchild 20:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Yeah, she loves me. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd completely forgotten about this. It's all good. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:26, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I figured haha but still didn't feel right to now edit articles about the things I used to complain about. Cheers! ♫ TheGridExe (talk) 12:53, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new featured and A-class content Book review: Hawkeye7 looks at battles of Operation Veritable in 1945

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]