User talk:Elephantranges

Ghosts of the Forest (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the article! :) Ovinus (talk) 02:21, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

of course! Mind if I ask a question?

How exactly am I supposed to go about adding album covers to infoboxes again? I know to upload the file to wikimedia commons, and how non-free covers can still be used when there’s no substitute and a valid reason for having them, but when I try to upload a file into an infobox, it asks me to check off a box saying I have the rights to the picture, which obviously in these cases I don’t. However, there’s obviously gotta be a legitimate way to upload album covers into articles since the vast majority of album articles do have them. Am I missing something? Thanks! Elephantranges (talk) 02:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Don't upload non-free images to Wikimedia Commons, as they aren't allowed there; instead, upload them here, on Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard and click the white "Upload a non-free file" button, and follow the steps there. Unlike Commons, Wikipedia accepts limited use of non-free files. If you're curious about the nitty gritty, WP:NFCC lists the rules, but an album cover is usually okay. Hope that helps! Ovinus (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ovinus: I might have meant Wikipedia, not Wikipedia Commons. Not sure, but I’ll use those links. Thanks! Elephantranges (talk) 03:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ovinus: Hey, sorry, one more question.

So I uploaded images for the covers of Ghosts of the Forest, Lonely Trip, and Mercy, everything went well except when I added them to the infobox, they're a bit too big and I'm not exactly sure how to make them appear smaller in their respective articles. Checked the source for other articles to see what they did differently but found nothing. Any help would be appreciated, thanks! Elephantranges (talk) 04:10, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, realized I just have to remove the [[ ]] surrounding the file name. Elephantranges (talk) 04:18, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Yes, the template does some internal processing that means the brackets aren't necessary. And no need to apologize for asking questions! Ovinus (talk) 04:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help! Elephantranges (talk) 04:22, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have another question about album art images.

So I went through a couple of articles recently and replaced their (very low quality) album art images with some higher resolution ones, using the wizard and doing everything the right way (as far as I can tell).

The new images are showing in the infoboxes, but why is it that when I click on them to zoom in, it then shows the older, lower-quality versions of the images? And is there anything I can do to fix this? Thanks Elephantranges (talk) 23:29, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Walking in the Park with Eloise, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Venus and Mars and Bobby Thompson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm torn on the track listing at Tales from Topographic Oceans. I actually just noticed you made the same edit I tried to make back in November, only to have it reverted. I can see the argument that it falls under MOS:STYLEVAR, but for a long time the page had the track listing as a simple list. At some point in time, some editors started changing a lot of the recommended simple bullet style listings over to the template listings, even if the track listing didn't necessitate that. Then when folks like you and I try to change it back, we get reverted. So frustrating. Anyway, I think you were in the right when you changed it back in November. Cheers.—The Keymaster (talk) 10:30, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Born for this Moment Gold.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elephantranges. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Return of the Dream Canteen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:38, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Days of Open Hand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairlight.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elephantranges. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Soul Cages (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oblivy. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, With_Friends_from_the_Orchestra, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The blog post contained original research; if it is supported by a WP:RS consider adding that source instead. Oblivy (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicago III, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Beekeeper you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 11:02, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elephantranges. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Soul Cages".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:08, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Versatile Heart, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steven Bernstein and Flook.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to When We Dance, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Do not source anything in AllMusic's genre sidebar, as it is user-generated. Also, adult contemporary is not a genre; it is a radio format. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 13:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know. Thanks Elephantranges (talk) 13:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Beekeeper you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Beekeeper for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 00:01, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Love Has No Pride

added a link pointing to John Boylan

Won't Be Long Now

added a link pointing to Linda Thompson

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elephantranges. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "McCartney I II III".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Complete On the Corner Sessions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Fun.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dirty Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:58, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everyday (Dave Matthews Band album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page I Did It.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Reconstruction of the Fables.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:03, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Elephantranges.

We seem to have a difference of opinion on the how to present the recording information on a couple of Neil Young album pages. Several of his albums, particularly in the 70s, were recorded across different years and studios and feature different musicians on each track. I find it helpful to list this information for each song independently. I've adopted a format other users have employed, for example on Neil Young Archives Volume II: 1972–1976. I find this format is clean and easy to read. I would like to find a format that we can both support so that we don't find ourselves overwriting each other's work. What are your thoughts?

Alcuin Alcuin (talk) 22:50, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’m all for listing the recording dates and locations of each track. (Especially considering Stars n Bars does the exact same thing on its own lp label!)

I just think that listing the personnel for each song might cause the tracklists to become a bit cluttered, especially considering there’s Personnel sections for that exact purpose.

Elephantranges (talk) 23:13, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alcuin (talk · contribs) thoughts? Elephantranges (talk) 14:54, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I dunno. I really haven't found a format that I'm happy with, other than what I had been doing. Personnel sections seem to be a good fit when the personnel is consistent for the whole album. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#Alternative_track_listings track listings seems to give an example similar to what I've been doing. Concert for George is another example of a page that takes a similar approach. I'd be open to putting the personnel with date and place of recording in the personnel section, but it doesn't necessarily seem like it's made for that information. Also, I can't seem to find a format I like. I wish that bulleted lists left less space between the header and the first bullet. I guess what I'm saying is that I still like the idea of providing the recording information in the tracklist section when there is information available that is specific to each track. I'm still open to any other ideas or examples that address the concerns I share in this post. Alcuin (talk) 22:46, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I totally get what you mean. I think it's important to note that with the example linked above (Before These Crowded Streets), each song usually has no more than, like, two musicians listed underneath the song titles. The main issue I have is really just that with the entire personnel for each song being listed it kinda screws up the formatting when looking at the mobile site, if you know what I mean.

Personally I think that maybe this might be a good way to format tracklists and lineups, using, say, On the Beach as an example:

{{Track listing

| headline = Side one

| extra_column = Producer(s)

| title1 = Walk On

| extra1 =

• Neil Young
• David Briggs

| length1 = 2:40

| note1 = recorded at Broken Arrow Ranch, November 30, 1973

| title2 = See the Sky About to Rain

| length2 = 5:03

| note2 = recorded at Sunset Sound, March 29, 1974

| extra2 =

• Young
• Mark Harman

| title3 = Revolution Blues

| note3 = recorded at Sunset Sound, April 6, 1974

| extra3 =

• Young
• Harman

| length3 = 4:02

| title4 = For the Turnstiles

| note4 = recorded at Broken Arrow Ranch, December 14, 1973

| extra4 = Young

| length4 = 3:13

| title5 = Vampire Blues

| note5 = recorded at Sunset Sound, April 7, 1974

| length5 = 4:11

| extra5 =

• Young
• Harman

| total_length = 19:09

}}

{{Track listing

| headline = Side two

| extra_column = Producer(s)

| title1 = On the Beach

| note1 = recorded at Sunset Sound, March 28, 1974

| extra1 =

• Young
• Al Schmitt

| length1 = 7:04

| title2 = Motion Pictures (For Carrie)

| note2 = recorded at Sunset Sound, March 26, 1974

| extra2 =

• Young
• Schmitt

| length2 = 4:20

| title3 = Ambulance Blues

| note3 = recorded at Sunset Sound, March 25, 1974

| extra3 =

• Young
• Schmitt

| length3 = 8:57

| total_length = 20:21

}}

==Personnel==

"Walk On"

• Neil Young – guitar, vocals
• Ben Keith – slide guitar, vocals
• Billy Talbot – bass
• Ralph Molina – drums

(and so on and so forth for the rest of the songs...)

Maybe this formatting would be more concise? Idk Elephantranges (talk) 23:09, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

that did NOT come out the way I wanted. weird Elephantranges (talk) 23:10, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Elephant, thanks for your work on the NY articles. I don't want to get off on the wrong foot, so thought I'd post here. I think the Hawks & Doves article still requires more sources, especially as it's still rather short, and stuff isn't subsequently cited in the subsections. If I can find anything for you, please let me know. Have a good holiday. Caro7200 (talk) 21:19, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that that suggestion template was referring only to the lead – completely my bad! Sorry about that Elephantranges (talk) 21:29, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Love Has Many Faces (box set). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 00:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Elephantranges,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:08, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Kakashi (album), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Up (R.E.M. album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fall on Me.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reveal (R.E.M. album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imitation of Life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to The Spectrum '97. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Elephantranges! On the subject of more sources to establish notability, Here's a review of the album. And additional references and be found here, here, and here. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 20:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you have an article listed at WP:GAN. I recently started a project, Good Article Review Circles, and thought you might be interested. This initiative helps articles get reviewed more quickly through collaborative efforts. By joining, you'll review others' articles and get your own reviewed in return. Check out the page for more details! — GMH Melbourne (talk) 08:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya there, I took a cursory glance at your GA nominated Fables of the Reconstruction article. I think that y've done a pretty good job, the prose, and the music and reception sections are solid as far as I am concerned, though I wanted to draw yr attention to a few things:

1. uDiscoverMusic may be considered unreliable per this 2020 discussion Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_62#Unreliable_Source it mentions other sources yet provides no link to them (for example: the Melody Maker article referenced can be found here (p. 70)) fundamentally it isn't bad though.

2. not a lot of stuff/sources on recording, promotion and release history. If you want to, you can look at some sources ive listed a few sources from the internet archive on its talk page that may provide additional specifics/content; it's wholly up to you (i don't plan on editing this page any time soon)

3. Also, I suggest that you should use Wikipedia:Peer review on an article before nominating it to GA

Hope this helps. Otherwise, keep up the good work!! // Chchcheckit (talk) 16:18, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks! As for uDiscover Music, I was under the impression that it is a valid source for info on the recording/production on an album, but not so much on the reception of an album or its cultural impact (due to an obvious conflict of interest there). That being said, I wrote all this before I found access to a number of R.E.M. biographies that I imagine have all that same info and more (which I utilized on the article for Reveal (R.E.M. album), which definitely turned out more detailed than this one) so I’ll probably go back to this one at some point and re-do those sections anyways.

Thanks for taking a look at it and giving feedback! Elephantranges (talk) 17:58, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Reveal (R.E.M. album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 21:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Reveal (R.E.M. album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Reveal (R.E.M. album) for comments about the article, and Talk:Reveal (R.E.M. album)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited If the River Can Bend, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Big Picture and Written in the Stars.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article White Christmas (1991 Bing Crosby album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 21 at 33 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 11:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 21 at 33 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:21 at 33 for comments about the article, and Talk:21 at 33/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit -- Chchcheckit (talk) 22:25, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect or redirects you have created has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 29 § Kid named Finger until a consensus is reached. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:54, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]