User talk:Ecpiandy/2012/February

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ecpiandy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Disney Channel (Kazakhstan) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Channel (Kazakhstan) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 01:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

I redirected The Speckerman Recurrence because, once the unsourced, original research and non-notable trivia is removed, the article becomes essentially a plot-only description, which fails WP:PLOT. The references in the article do not establish notability and the only ratings figure is already in the season article, so it just reproduces information that is already available in another, pre-existing article. Without significant additional information that establishes notability the article should not exist. --AussieLegend (talk) 12:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Flat 2, 12 Arbour Road, London, England, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Yasht101 (talk) 05:31, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flat 2, 12 Arbour Road, London, England. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fictional addresses do not get articles. Creating unworthy articles like this is a waste of other editors' time. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:16, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Fox VOD requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gene Belcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Belcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bear Paws (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Crackers and Cracker

Fox's Animation Domination (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rival and Kevin Reilly

The Cay (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Theodore Taylor and Douglas Stewart

Fox (India) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to DTH

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Animation Domination, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:11, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TBrandley for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:15, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Loser List: Revenge of the Loser. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The Loser List (series). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Loser List (series) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DGG ( talk ) 04:34, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

the above is the formal notice, generated by the program. But speaking more personally, as I would prefer: The book may possibly become a best seller, but until it does, I think it would be covered well enough in the main article. I don't even think there should be a cross-referencem until it gets published; then one would be appropriate. For the first book in the series, I merged the plot contents into the main article and changed it to a redirect. The principle I go by is that it is better to have one strong article than 3 very weak ones. If you know of any reviews for them published in references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases, then add links to them--that's what's needed in an article on a book; that's what's of use to the reader. I hope you agree. DGG ( talk ) 04:43, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Video games based on Fox network shows, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 15:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Springfield Road, Kelowna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Springfield Road, Kelowna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts in creating the new What Were They Thinking? article; it is appreciated. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:13, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fox Movies (Portugal) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Horror and Action

Key & Peele (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ian Roberts

List of television programming blocks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Super Sunday

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Call 2 Win is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call 2 Win until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Logical Cowboy (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Please see WP:NFCC#9. Unfortunately, non-free files are not allowed in the userspace, so the image of Peter Griffin should be removed. Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 22:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Logopedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 00:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi TBrandley, you recently removed a deletion tag from Logopedia. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your vote at The Big Bang Theory requested move. When determining the outcome of such discussions we rely on the rationale behind a vote, and not just the vote itself, to determine consensus. Votes with no rationale can be discarded. To avoid this happening to your vote, please visit Talk:The Big Bang Theory#Requested move and expand upon your vote with a rationale. This will ensure that your vote is not wasted. --AussieLegend (talk) 02:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content as you did at Fox Television Studios. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Logical Cowboy (talk) 02:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on District Policing Partnerships requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 05:22, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Articles waiting for more information to be released from February 2012, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 23:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Disney Channel (Kazakhstan), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:48, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, TBrandley. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:50, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Disney Channel (Kazakhstan), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Disney Channel (Kazakhstan). If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. JayJay^{Talk to me} 23:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Disney Channel (Kazakhstan). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on 4Rivers Smokehouse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 00:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Just to be clear, there is no award for most articles created then instantly deleted. Creating trivial articles that violate WP:CSD, WP:GNG, and WP:RS makes a lot of extra work for other editors. Please read these guidelines carefully and keep in mind the time of other editors if you create future articles. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 01:14, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Upcoming television series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Belcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Belcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article What Were They Thinking? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Were They Thinking? until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JayJay^{Talk to me} 03:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Allen Gregory has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Other websites has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Infobox snack has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Fuzz (talk) 21:19, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Archway (cookie company). Since you had some involvement with the Archway (cookie company) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). JayJay^{Talk to me} 21:45, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on FOX (Tateland), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 06:01, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Hey Tate. Back in November, you got a PROD notification ("Proposed deletion of List of programs broadcast by TB Network" above), and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swallingwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk 19:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Please discuss your proposed change to the primary topic of Big Bang Theory at Talk:Big Bang Theory. Repeatedly changing contrary to the last consensus is disruptive. -- JHunterJ (talk) 22:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Do not restore unsourced material to articles, as you did here. Also, do not revert other editors changes without providing an edit summary.—Kww(talk) 17:53, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Fox's Animation Domination shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Logical Fuzz (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

The article List of television series notable for positive reception has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability. Random collection of TV series.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of television series notable for positive reception is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of television series notable for positive reception until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. noq (talk) 20:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of a day for edit warring, as you did at Fox's Animation Domination. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 21:04, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Optik TV channels (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mandarin, A&E, RDI, ONE (TV channel), The Score, Punjabi, On demand and TSN

Bob Belcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Crawl Space, Dial 'M' for Monkey and Sacred Cow

List of programs broadcast by BiteTV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Arrested Development and Papillon

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello TBrandley. Please note that you cannot just randomly tag articles with the {{good article}} template, as you did here to The Office (UK TV series) and here to Fox's Animation Domination. This template is only for articles which have gone through a nomination process and meet specific article criteria. Of course, you are welcome to clean up the article to meets the standards, and then nominate it. I'd suggest you take a look at some television articles in the Good Articles/Arts category to see what a Good Article should look like. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Napoleon Dynamite, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:07, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not perform cut and paste moves, as you have with Template:Infobox programming block, it splits the page history, which is highly undesirable. If a redirect is preventing an uncontroversial move, you can tag it for speedy deletion with the {{db-move}} template. I have listed the page at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen, which will call an administrator to fix the issue, if there are other cut and paste moves you have preformed, please list them there as well. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 04:57, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

I have been bold and changed your new page Help:WikiProject into a redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide. That's the main page for the WikiProject help resources. What do you think? -- John of Reading (talk) 07:19, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TBrandley for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. JayJay^{Talk to me} 21:25, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Also you may want to use one of these for User:Tate.B.Stockwell if not your account may be blocked JayJay^{Talk to me} 22:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Fox's Animation Domination. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Don't source to promotional Facebook pages, and especially not Wikipedia articles. And don't synthesize theories about programming directions, especially in regards to the Saturday block. thank you. Nate • (chatter) 03:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 08:56, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I strongly urge you to learn our article guidelines; we are not the place to put every bit of possible minutia about a television series. Nate • (chatter) 09:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Key & Peele characters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dish, Hell's Kitchen and Bitch

List of Canadian animated television series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Teletoon

List of Canadian network television schedules (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Schedule

List of TV-14 episodes of The Simpsons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Sexual

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:The Programming Block Barnstar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:24, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello, you are welcome to contribute to the following page.

WP:Requests for comment/TBrandley

Thanks.

Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)