User talk:Bhunacat10

Archives

no archives yet (create)

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 15 sections are present.

Hi Bhunacat10, my name is Ayush Paul Tirkey. On 2017 I created user page with my old account, and now I forgot my old Wikipedia username and the problem arrived when I deleted my gmail account. So I am unable to access my account. Can you please remove the content of user page. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ayush_Paul_Tirkey Mynameisayush (talk) 19:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mynameisayush. It should normally be enough to just "blank" the user page – remove all the content by normal editing. If you want you could replace the content with {{Retired}}: Bhunacat10 (talk), 22:41, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So, can you please "blank" the user page. That was my old account and currently I created new account so I am unable to blank that page. Thank you for your support. Mynameisayush (talk) 07:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: Bhunacat10 (talk), 09:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much :) Mynameisayush (talk) 14:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who has the regulatory compliance expertise and experience to evaluate the correctness or whether or not content is an improvement for articles relating to regulatory compliance? You will find the Board of Directors of the Society of Quality Assurance (SQA) is aligned with my explanation of GxP. I am a past president and current board member. We find that many Wikipedia articles relating to regulatory compliance are grossly incorrect. As these regulations relate to worldwide public health and safety, Wikipedia is not helping the challenge of improving quality and compliance. There is no regulation such as GxP and the definition of GxP should make this clear. Wikipedia should not advance incorrect regulatory information such that it looks as if it is coming from a qualified source.

Gregfurrow (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Gregfurrow[reply]

Sorry, I didn't mean to remove the balanced and correctly cited information you re-included on Rishad Bathiudeen. Thanks for replacing it. ubiquity (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK Ubiquity! There's a lot going on at the moment on that article. I've asked for a further period of semi-protection: Bhunacat10 (talk), 16:19, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited London Bullion Market Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ETF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i might need help, because everytime i put a filmography or the like, room just runs out

Reply on User talk:1.43.110.199: Bhunacat10 (talk), 08:01, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please note {{vexill}} is a template. It don't do much but that don't matter: this report includes the several pages which use it. So it don't qualify for deletion. Next time use special:WhatLinksHere before applying a speedy tag. And , yes, if I were an hyper-diligent admin I would have used special:WhatLinksHere before I did the deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:06, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, got it. Mea maxima culpa: Bhunacat10 (talk), 20:49, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help Bhunacat10! LizzieMack (talk)

I find your comment "there are not many who are still genuinely here to "build an encyclopedia" extremely odd. You may also wish to check before you discuss my participation at EAR. I have made over 1,000 contributions to that forum. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:25, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Kudpung. What gives me this jaundiced attitude is largely patrolling the "reflist removal" filter, which picks up a few of the least skilled among the COI editors who overwrite an existing article with some screed of their own. As we have let in all these millions of barely-watched articles about not-very-notable living people and companies, it is inevitable that the subjects of these articles, their friends and relatives, employees and paid editors, will sooner or later find their way to all these articles and adapt them to their own purposes. New page patrol does not of course detect new articles under existing titles. Meanwhile, most WikiProjects and collaborations are dead. Articles are not being updated or improved by disinterested editors. Portals are being killed off as we speak because so many have gone untouched for a decade. I estimate that 95% of present-day "editors" are here for some self-interested purpose and the other 5% are ineffectually trying to stop them (that may be a slight exaggeration). Anyhow I'll stay away from EAR – don't know why it isn't just redirected to Help desk: Bhunacat10 (talk), 10:42, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Who has the regulatory compliance expertise and experience to evaluate the correctness or whether or not content is an improvement for articles relating to regulatory compliance? You will find the Board of Directors of the Society of Quality Assurance (SQA) is aligned with my explanation of GxP. I am a past president and current board member. We find that many Wikipedia articles relating to regulatory compliance are grossly incorrect. As these regulations relate to worldwide public health and safety, Wikipedia is not helping the challenge of improving quality and compliance. There is no regulation such as GxP and the definition of GxP should make this clear. Wikipedia should not advance incorrect regulatory information such that it looks as if it is coming from a qualified source.

Gregfurrow (talk) 16:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)Gregfurrow

Gregfurrow For the accuracy of articles we do not rely on the expertise of any Wikipedia editors, but on the expertise embodied in credible published sources referenced by means of citations in the article. The article on GxP as it stands would benefit from more citations, and you are welcome to add relevant citations to the article. If you see unreferenced content there with which you disagree, you are entitled to remove it, giving a brief explanation in the edit summary. To propose major changes and expansions to the article, its talk page is available, and I would suggest that you continue the discussion there: Bhunacat10 (talk), 08:27, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may have misunderstood. GxP is not a regulation. There are no GxP regulations or guidance. References to GxP, like the existing Wikipedia article are misleading the uninformed and misleading people new to FDA regulatory compliance. FDA doesn't create clarifying guidance because GxP doesn't exist. The references I linked in my revision were for promulgated regulations and compliance program guidance manuals. My hope was to redirect people from the idea of GxP compliance to compliance with actual regulations. What isn't apparent in the Wikipedia article is there are people who believe they can be GxP compliant. That's the public health and safety problem.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregfurrow (talk • contribs) 24 May 2019 (UTC)

I don't think I can usefully add to my previous comment. Please sign your posts to talk pages: Bhunacat10 (talk), 14:55, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine, i wiped out references and categorie section, as i trust you to be friend to fix it, regards— Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.43.110.199 (talk • contribs) 24 May 2019 (UTC)

No, it is not fine to remove important elements from articles. You have been told about this several times before. Please take steps to avoid this happening again. Please sign your posts to talk pages: Bhunacat10 (talk), 14:55, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

this is the reason why i asked you kindly to help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.42.2.16 (talk) 13:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're expecting other editors to clean up after you? I'm not always here, and none of us can even monitor your edits, as your IP address keeps changing and you have chosen not to open an account. You are making other types of edits without any difficulties, so why whenever you add a filmography table must you remove all the following wikitext? Next time you add a table, would you please go very slowly and carefully, use the preview button at each stage, and surely you will then identify just what is causing the unwanted removals. I don't want to deter your useful editing, just wish you could pin down this one problem. Please sign your posts to talk pages: Bhunacat10 (talk), 15:09, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Professional certification into List of professional designations in the United States. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:ABU Song Contest 2019 Map.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CptViraj (📧) 13:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bhunacat10,

I would like to know if there are any articles that I can contribute to via research or any articles that I can try and edit for grammar? I want to help; however, I cannot find a place for it.

Kind Regards, Shreyas — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shreyasfc (talk • contribs) 15:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bhunacat10! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:05, 30 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]