User talk:217.155.59.206

Hello, I'm Anupmehra. An edit that you recently made to Ian Paisley seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See, Wikipedia reliable source examples Anupmehra -Let's talk! 16:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Thank you, 217.155.59.206 for adding House of Lords Reform Act 2014 to Category:Stubs. However, there are a couple things that you should note:

1. You should try to find the most appropriate stub category to place stub articles in.
2. You must always place {{Stub}} at the far bottom of the article bellow any navigational templates and all the categories.

Thanks!

Clone200 (talk) 20:10, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Runchorelal baronets may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *Sir (Prashant0 Chinubhai Madhowlal Ranchhodlal, 4th Baronet (born 1955).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:41, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Europe of Nations and Freedom. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:16, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hi. You recently edited Ronald Gordon claiming his death last Saturday. Do you have a reliable source to support that claim? Otherwise we might need to retract the claim until the death can be confirmed. Best, Pichpich (talk) 19:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 217.155.59.206. Since you've edited one or more of List of current members of the British Privy Council, British Government frontbench and Official Opposition frontbench in the last six months, I'd like to invite you to a discussion about the use of honorifics in those lists. The discussion is happening here, and I look forward to a helpful and robust discussion. DBD 20:53, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to District of Columbia's at-large congressional district may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{Election box begin|title=D.C. At Large Congressional District Election (1873)<ref>{{cite news |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:35, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jammu and Kashmir Rifles, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. I noticed that you had added two new life peerages to a list in the article List of life peerages (2010–present). Do you have a source for those peerage titles? --Editor FIN (talk) 11:24, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The information came from the 'Court and Social' page of the Daily Telegraph, which prints notices of new peerages in a very formal way, including the title, territorial designation (if any) and full names of the grantee. Oddly, these notices never include the date of creation, which is why I always put 'TBA' in the date column. The other issue is that these notices do not seem to appear anywhere on the paper's website, so an actual citation is difficult. I have not known them to be incorrect in any of the details though. I suppose a citable version might be available from the London Gazette, but I have never found their website easy to use. I have not yet seen notices in the Telegraph relating to Brownlow, Davies or Hallett, recently added to the list by another user.217.155.59.206 (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from Duke of Hamilton without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing to the article Military Provost Guard Service. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My edit consisted of moving existing text around within the article with the aim of improving the structure. You appear not to have noticed that the sentence you removed was not added by me, merely moved (I am very particular about not removing material where I'm less than fully familiar with the subject matter). I do not object to it's removal as unsourced. However, I feel the tone of your comment above and your edit summary are patronising and uncalled for.217.155.59.206 (talk) 22:04, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You did a great work in the table in 'Departments of the Napoleonic Empire in Europe' section of the article. Looks much better now. Happy editing! Excellenc1 (talk) 16:18, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ternera. I noticed that in this edit to Mountmellick (parish), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ternera (talk) 21:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Africa Evangelical Presbyterian Church, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. JeffUK 21:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Amalgamated Society of Vehicle Builders, Carpenters and Mechanics, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bigcheese26 (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit I made was merely to move the page from Category:Christian denominations to Category:Former Christian denominations which is a subcategory of the same. This seemed an appropriate move to make, as the main category has very few pages at the top level and the subject of the page appeared to be a historical rather than current denomination (or group of denominations). Whether this was right or not, objectively it's hardly unconstructive‎, and to describe it as vandalism is plainly inaccurate, disproportionate and actually quite rude. 217.155.59.206 (talk) 12:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Stewie&Cartman 02:03, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Church in Wales. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 16:45, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Wiiformii. An edit that you recently made to St. Patrokli, Soest seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Wiiformii (talk) 21:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cmrc23. I noticed that you recently removed content from Social Democratic Party of Hungarian Gypsies without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 18:54, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]