Talk:Laotong

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New article on Laotong and Laotang tradition in Hunan, China. OttawaAC (talk) 23:57, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um, I do not quite understand, but what does the category "lesbian fiction" do here? I read article and articles on the works dedicated to this tradition several times, but I saw nothing about sexuality or romance. If in the case of Class S (genre) it is understandable because of the lesbian and homoerotic roots of the genre, then in this case I do not see any reasons for to add this category. Solaire the knight (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with the prior editor, this is not in the slightest LGBT. A formal contract of sisterhood between two women with no sexual interest or connotations, or even the implication of personal friendship, is unrelated to any such category. 86.7.223.84 (talk) 00:32, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Following on from this, I have edited out the irrelevant category as well as the feminism sidebar. Reasons given in the edit summary. 86.7.223.84 (talk) 13:02, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]