User talk:Cardabela48

Hello Cardabela,
welcome to Wikidata and thank you for your nice work related to the categories. Don't forget to report the empty items on WD:RFD (and the reason why), so that they would get deleted. You could post there all at once. If you have any question, just ask.
Best regards, --#Reaper (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autopatroller/text/en Snow Blizzard 17:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WD:Requests for deletions#Q9225236 and WD:Requests for deletions#Q8056892. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 17:25, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification on my talk page. The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 04:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cardabela48! I noticed that you made some changes in good faith to Category:People from Kazan (Q6041180) by moving the interwiki links from Category:Births in Kazan (Q13365088). However, there are some fine differences across the plateau of different language Wikipedias. En.wiki doesn't categorise people by where they were born, but many other Wikipedias do, such as fr.wiki. In some cases, like the Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedias, they have both categories. Just because category trees are similar, they shouldn't always be merged. The interwikis have to match up 100%. So please, to avoid interwiki conflicts, be careful in the future. All the best! Jared Preston (talk) 15:53, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Cardabela48,

For merging items, you may want to use the merge.js gadget from help page about merging. It has an option "Request deletion for extra items on RfD" to automatically place a request to delete the emptied page. This way of nominating makes it a lot easier for the admins to process the requests.

I see you do the merges manually now, that's all right, but you may find using the gadget saves you time and effort. If not, no problem, the work you do is appreciated regardlessly.

With regards, - - (Cycn/talk) 09:50, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cardabela48, I see that you are doing lots of work for merging categories manually and requesting deletion for leftover items. I believe it would be preferable to replace these leftover pages with redirections (see Help:Redirects). It would no longer require Administrators to manually perform the deletion of the leftover item, and make Wikidata much more stable in case the old items were already being used in other items or by external clients.

As other contributors indicated on this talk page, I recommend that you use the merge gadget for best addressing such cases. See Help:Merge if you don't know how to activate or use that tool, there is a section for MediaWiki:Gadget-Merge.js in every language. It is very easy to enable it (from your preferences), much faster than manual merges like you are currently doing, and leaves a cleaner WD.

Let me know if something is not clear or if you have questions. Regards - LaddΩ chat ;) 16:36, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't mix up different concepts please, like a Wikimedia list and a position. I've cleaned up the mess you've created. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 08:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je vois que tu travailles beaucoup sur les ambassadeurs. Si possible tu pourrais ajouter les qualificatifs follows (P155) et followed by (P156), ça permet de naviguer facilement dans le temps, et de vérifier que les listes sont complètes. Ca permet aussi de remarquer les erreurs. Par exemple Joseph Jules de Cadoine de Gabriac (Q7124040) n'était apparemment pas ambassadeur en Russie, et donc on ne peut pas lui mettre de "précédé par" ou de "suivi par". --Zolo (talk) 09:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cardabela48, please don't add GND identifiers when they only refer to names, not to individual persons, such as [1]. You can tell the difference by looking at the identifier in the German National Library (if it says "Name" instead of "Person", don't use it) or at VIAF (if it says "undifferentiated", don't use it). Thanks! Jonathan Groß (talk) 15:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour J'ai supprimé votre affirmation erronée (voir en pdd). Cdt --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:49, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't add P794 (P794) to items or statements; it is being deprecated. Thanks. Swpb (talk) 16:27, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

Depuis 4 mois, je prends tous les décrets Legifrance, et je rentre les nominations et promotions dans les ordre de Arts et Lettre, de l'ordre national du mérite, et de la Légion d'honneur. Je précise bien que l'orsque qu'il y a promotion, la personne a été chevalier d'un temps, jusqu'à sa promotion en officier.

Pour chacune de ces informations, je rentre leurs grades, et la mention deprecated est importante lors d'une promotion. Pour l'exemple Zahia Ziouani , je viens de voir que vous venez de retirer "Knight of the National Order of Merit" en mentionnant que l'information était deprecated, mais c'était fait exprès. C'est une informations de savoir qu'elle a été chevalier de l'ordre pendant X années, et qu'elle n'a pas été promu directement au grade d'officier. La mention deprecated permet de ne pas afficher l'information dans les écrans Wikipedias.

Je souhaite remettre l'information que vous avez retiré, est-ce que cela vous dérange ? Est-ce que c'est une best-practice de Wikidata que de retirer toutes les informations déprecated du site ?  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Roniee (talk • contribs) at 10:32, 11 April 2019‎ (UTC).[reply]

Cardabela48 et @Roniee: Moi, je me demande la même chose, cet fois à Kaija Saariaho (Q241432). Y a-t-il une décision communautaire? Finnusertop (talk) 11:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Cardabela,

êtes-vous sûre que date de publication convient pour les dates de soutenances des mémoires ou thèses ?

Cordialement, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Bonjour,

merci de ne pas déclarer les agrégations comme des diplômes ; ce n'en sont pas.

Cordialement, Nomen ad hoc (talk) 07:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Bonjour Cardabela48, en 2016 vous avez créé l'élément « ambassador of Armenia to Japan » et vous l'avez raccordé à l'élément Diana Abgar en tant que « fonction » remplie par elle. À vrai dire pourtant, contrairement à ce que l’on a si souvent affirmé, elle n’a jamais été ambassadrice, mais n’a été nommée que « consul honoraire » très peu de temps en 1920, ainsi qu'on peut lire ici. Comme je ne saurais pas comment régler le problème moi-même (je ne suis pas un expert de Wikidata), je me demandais si vous pouviez y jeter un coup d'œil.--Jeanambr (talk) 17:58, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain this. The point was, that she NEVER made her PhD! Or please give a proof of the contrary! -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,

merci de ne pas supprimer des alias utiles et correspondant à un usage établi. Merci de votre compréhension.

Nomen ad hoc (talk) 17:21, 21 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, why you are doing this? I think, it is the best way, how to distinguish people. Skim (talk) 16:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Me too, why (in Pierre Gacon (Q112961073) ) --Gnrc (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I think we should use two distinctive properties - "topic's main category" (P910), which is a broad category of everything related to "doctor honoris causa" title from a particular institution, and more narrow one, "category for recipients of this award" (P2517), which has to be a category for people, received this award. Most of the time these two have the same value. In some rare cases they are different.

I see you removed P2517 in the past while I did the same with P910. Right now I don't think we should remove the 1st or the 2nd - they supposed to be different. What's your opinion? PeterLemenkov (talk) 07:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You readded coordinates to Q1370342. I don't think this is good practise as organizations generally aren't fixated to particular location, as mentioned earlier in edit summary (Special:Diff/1791903609), and so simple coordinates statement is ambigous and imprecise. Organizations can operate in multiple locations or in different locations at different times. This particular organizations also operates in multiple locations. In this item headquarters coordinates are already provided more accurately as a qualifer to headquarters location (P159). See also recommendations in Wikidata:WikiProject Companies/Properties. 2001:7D0:81FD:BC80:ADCC:412:9E5B:39F0 08:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose your concern is the infobox in fr:Académie estonienne de musique et de théâtre? Coordinates can be entered there if this template (yet) can't extract coordinates from headquarters location (P159). I added the coordinates in this article (fr:Special:Diff/200131158) so now it shouln't be necessary to readd the coordinate location (P625) statement for this reason. 2001:7D0:81FD:BC80:4CA7:259C:E026:69A2 09:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Cardabela48!

Please do not put names in preferred rank if that is part of the full birth name. Other projects need the information, e.g. Wikimedia Commons to specify the name categories. Otherwise, the other first names and surnames are automatically hidden when one of the names is ranked preferred, which may result in empty categories. Best regards --HarryNº2 (talk) 17:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir! Concernant [2], je me suis permis de remettre la seconde date, puisqu'elle est toujours présente sur le site de la BNF. Elle est bien marquée comme rang dépréciée. Bonne soirée, -Framawiki (please notify !) (talk) 19:43, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]