Our Inner Ape: A Leading Primatologist Explains Why We Are Who We Are
by Frans de Waal
On This Page
Description
We have long attributed man's violent, aggressive, competitive nature to his animal ancestry. But what if we are just as given to cooperation, empathy, and morality by virtue of our genes? What if our behavior actually makes us apes? What kind of apes are we? From a scientist and writer E. O. Wilson has called "the world authority on primate social behavior" comes a fascinating look at the most provocative aspects of human nature-power, sex, violence, kindness, and morality-through our two show more closest cousins in the ape family. For nearly twenty years, Frans de Waal has worked with both the famously aggressive chimpanzee and the lesser-known egalitarian, erotic, matriarchal bonobo, two species whose DNA is nearly identical to that of humans. De Waal shows the range of human behavior through his study of chimpanzees and bonobos, drawing from their personalities, relationships, power struggles, and high jinks important insights about our human behavior. The result is an engrossing and surprising narrative that reveals what their behavior can teach us about our own nature. "An informative and engaging work." --Library Journal "De Waal offers vivid, often delightful stories of politics, sex, violence and kindness in the ape communities he has studied to illustrate such questions as why we are irreverent toward the powerful and whether men or women are better at conflict resolution."--Publishers Weekly "Never has he [de Waal] written better on his great theme than in this absorbing overview of power, sex, violence, and kindness among apes--and humans."--Booklist "Sklar adds just a touch of a smile to his sonorous voice, conveying friendliness, warmth, and humor."--AudioFile Magazine show lessTags
Recommendations
Member Reviews
الغنى بالمعلومات والبعد الفلسفي للنقاش العلمي تجعله أحد الكتب التي تدخلك في حالة من الصفن والتفكر بعد الانتهاء منها.
يتناول بشكل رئيسي القواسم المشتركة بين القردة العليا ومن ضمنها الأخلاق التي تبين أنها ليست حكراً على البشر، بل راسخة بعمق في تراثنا الحيواني مثل العدوانية والسلوك التنافسي.
نحن البشر نعتقد بسذاجة أننا نتخذ القرارات الأخلاقية اعتماداً على المنطق العقلاني والإرادة الحرة. إذا كان الأمر كذلك، show more فسيلزم تفعيل القشرة الدماغية. ولكن عند فحص دماغ الإنسان في مواجهة معضلة أخلاقية، لوحظ نشاط مناطق أعمق في الدماغ - تلك التي نشترك فيها مع الرئيسات الأخرى. يناقش أيضاً كيف أن كراهية الأجانب جزء من تركيبنا التطوري، ما يجعل الحجج المنطقية غير نافعة في مواجهة هذا الفكر. show less
يتناول بشكل رئيسي القواسم المشتركة بين القردة العليا ومن ضمنها الأخلاق التي تبين أنها ليست حكراً على البشر، بل راسخة بعمق في تراثنا الحيواني مثل العدوانية والسلوك التنافسي.
نحن البشر نعتقد بسذاجة أننا نتخذ القرارات الأخلاقية اعتماداً على المنطق العقلاني والإرادة الحرة. إذا كان الأمر كذلك، show more فسيلزم تفعيل القشرة الدماغية. ولكن عند فحص دماغ الإنسان في مواجهة معضلة أخلاقية، لوحظ نشاط مناطق أعمق في الدماغ - تلك التي نشترك فيها مع الرئيسات الأخرى. يناقش أيضاً كيف أن كراهية الأجانب جزء من تركيبنا التطوري، ما يجعل الحجج المنطقية غير نافعة في مواجهة هذا الفكر. show less
A conversational book about looking towards the apes - particularly bonobos and chimps- to find the origins of our own behaviors.
de Waal relates stories and research from the world of primatology (his own work and others) and hypothesizes on how they relate to the world of anthropology.
Some of the most interesting parts were seeing American science and culture through de Waal’s European immigrant eyes. His reflections on how violence saturates American cinema wasn’t eye-opening for me but it made my own desensitized nature on the subject more clear.
This book is not a textbook. Don’t go looking for lots of facts and figures on primate studies here. It is a meditation on what it means to be a human among all the other primates on show more this planet from an expert in the field. show less
de Waal relates stories and research from the world of primatology (his own work and others) and hypothesizes on how they relate to the world of anthropology.
Some of the most interesting parts were seeing American science and culture through de Waal’s European immigrant eyes. His reflections on how violence saturates American cinema wasn’t eye-opening for me but it made my own desensitized nature on the subject more clear.
This book is not a textbook. Don’t go looking for lots of facts and figures on primate studies here. It is a meditation on what it means to be a human among all the other primates on show more this planet from an expert in the field. show less
As a leading primatologist, Mr. Waal has studied chimps and apes for years. He shares his findings on primate behaviour with the reader and draws astounding parallels to human behaviour. He shares personal experiences with the reader as well as some groundbreaking studies done in the field.
Although the book deals with science, psychology and behaviour it is insightful and not at all what I would consider a “dry read”. It really does not matter if your beliefs lean towards creationism or evolution, this book is informative and enjoyable.
Although the book deals with science, psychology and behaviour it is insightful and not at all what I would consider a “dry read”. It really does not matter if your beliefs lean towards creationism or evolution, this book is informative and enjoyable.
De Waal takes the reader on a tour of the remarkable differences between chimpanzees and bonobo's, our two closest relatives, relating their traits back to human behaviour and predispositions. As a premier expert in primatology, De Waal knows his subject a noone else.
What I don't understand is why the author repeatedly takes a stand against the (popular) evolutionary literature of the last 30 years (characterizing it as focusing only on the brutish, selfish aspects of natural selection and keeping a blind eye to the fact that altruism, reciprocity and love exist). I personally really like books like The Selfish Gene and Darwin's Dangerous Idea and I found the ideas presented by De Waal to be in no way in conflict with the ideas from show more these books. In The Selfish Gene, Dawkins too stresses that the harsh, emotionless character of the selection process does not necessarily produce behaviour that is brutish ans selfish towards other beings. In the race for reproduction, morality, care for others and altruism can be viable strategies. Axelrod's The Evolution Of Cooperation (1984) is about exactly this comforting observation: moral and caring behaviour is in no way evolutionary naive.
Back to De Waal's book: apart from the slight irritation over the strawman argument against Dawkins c.s., I truly enjoyed this book. I have gained many new insights in the reasons behind certain behaviours in both humans and animals. I hope to be able to see chimpanzees or bonobo's in the wild some day and I will definitely reread this book then. Until then, the apes will claim (even) more time of the zoo visits I like to make. The chapter on chimpanzee power politics is a masterpiece. The author has an admirable ability to mix scientific observations and very personal, emotionally touching stories into a convincing presentation of a theory. He always makes sure that anecdotal evidence is marked as such and used as an illustration only. But what nice illustions they make!
All in all, I loved this book.
EDIT: I've just returned from a visit to Mahale Mountains NP, where I had the privilige of seeing chimps in the wild while re-reading this book. The book totally stands up to a second reading. Loved it again. Read this book. show less
What I don't understand is why the author repeatedly takes a stand against the (popular) evolutionary literature of the last 30 years (characterizing it as focusing only on the brutish, selfish aspects of natural selection and keeping a blind eye to the fact that altruism, reciprocity and love exist). I personally really like books like The Selfish Gene and Darwin's Dangerous Idea and I found the ideas presented by De Waal to be in no way in conflict with the ideas from show more these books. In The Selfish Gene, Dawkins too stresses that the harsh, emotionless character of the selection process does not necessarily produce behaviour that is brutish ans selfish towards other beings. In the race for reproduction, morality, care for others and altruism can be viable strategies. Axelrod's The Evolution Of Cooperation (1984) is about exactly this comforting observation: moral and caring behaviour is in no way evolutionary naive.
Back to De Waal's book: apart from the slight irritation over the strawman argument against Dawkins c.s., I truly enjoyed this book. I have gained many new insights in the reasons behind certain behaviours in both humans and animals. I hope to be able to see chimpanzees or bonobo's in the wild some day and I will definitely reread this book then. Until then, the apes will claim (even) more time of the zoo visits I like to make. The chapter on chimpanzee power politics is a masterpiece. The author has an admirable ability to mix scientific observations and very personal, emotionally touching stories into a convincing presentation of a theory. He always makes sure that anecdotal evidence is marked as such and used as an illustration only. But what nice illustions they make!
All in all, I loved this book.
EDIT: I've just returned from a visit to Mahale Mountains NP, where I had the privilige of seeing chimps in the wild while re-reading this book. The book totally stands up to a second reading. Loved it again. Read this book. show less
Може би добра като за начало на пътешествието описващо еволюционните корени на човека и неговата психология, но с доста бих казал детинско разбиране както за еволюционната, така и на психологическата страна на нещата.
Това детинско, повърхностно разбиране, което пространно и многократно показва ДеВаал в настоящата книга, се простира както върху интерпретацията му на известни книги и идеи в сферата, така show more и върху собствените му разсъждения.
Не, Франс, "себичен ген" не означава, че гените правят хората себични - означава, че себичните гени на рибката, за която разказваш по-нататък, са предпочели да я убият, за да запазят няколкото копия на себе си, населяващи нейните деца. И това е са��о една от идеите, които той тълкува погрешно и от това страдат собствените му изводи.
Нещата стават още по-зле, когато се опитва да навлиза в обществената и политическа страна на нещата, давайки съвети относно това как трябва да уредим обществото и държавата, базирани на неговата интерпретация на психологията на шимпанзетата.
Иначе книгата е приятна и лесна за четене, анекдотите за наблюдаваните от автора шимпанзета са забавни и поучителни - но се налага да си вадим сами изводите от тях, а не да разчитаме на автора. show less
Това детинско, повърхностно разбиране, което пространно и многократно показва ДеВаал в настоящата книга, се простира както върху интерпретацията му на известни книги и идеи в сферата, така show more и върху собствените му разсъждения.
Не, Франс, "себичен ген" не означава, че гените правят хората себични - означава, че себичните гени на рибката, за която разказваш по-нататък, са предпочели да я убият, за да запазят няколкото копия на себе си, населяващи нейните деца. И това е са��о една от идеите, които той тълкува погрешно и от това страдат собствените му изводи.
Нещата стават още по-зле, когато се опитва да навлиза в обществената и политическа страна на нещата, давайки съвети относно това как трябва да уредим обществото и държавата, базирани на неговата интерпретация на психологията на шимпанзетата.
Иначе книгата е приятна и лесна за четене, анекдотите за наблюдаваните от автора шимпанзета са забавни и поучителни - но се налага да си вадим сами изводите от тях, а не да разчитаме на автора. show less
Read. This was a very interesting book. Talked alot about the historical development of Chimpanzees, bonobos, gorilla (some), and humans.
I have learned a little bit about other primates but nothing about humans so I feel cheated by the title. I suspect the title was designed to do that.
Members
- Recently Added By
Lists
Books Read in 2017
4,236 works; 128 members
Author Information
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6884/c6884ead06442e09d5b8ece4be175f2521d41b63" alt="Picture of author."
33+ Works 5,564 Members
Frans De Waal has been named one of Time magazine's 100 Most Influential People. The author of The Bonobo and the Atheist, among many other works, he is the C. H. Candler Professor in Emory University's Psychology Department and director of the Living Links Center at the Yerkes National Primate Research Center. He lives in Atlanta, Georgia.
Awards and Honors
Distinctions
Notable Lists
Common Knowledge
- Original title
- Our inner ape : a leading primatologist explains why we are who we are
- Original publication date
- 2005
- Dedication
- For Cattie, my love
- First words
- One can take the ape out of the jungle, but not the jungle out of the ape.
- Quotations
- It is often thought that survival of the fittest means wiping out the unfit. But one can also win the evolutionary race by having a superior immune system or by being better at finding food. (Chap. 1 “Apes in the Family�... (show all)��)
In a Moscow laboratory I once saw a remarkable reconstruction of a Neanderthal face based on a skull. The scientists confided that they had never dared publicize the bust due to its uncanny resemblance to one of their countr... (show all)y's leading politicians, who might not have appreciated the comparison. (Chap. 1 “Apes in the Family”)
If conflict is like bad weather, women try to stay out of it whereas men buy an umbrella. Women are peacekeepers, men peacemakers. Women's friendships are often see as more profound and intimate than men's […] Like Ma... (show all)ma and Kuif in the Arnhem [chimpanzee] colony, they avoid confrontation at all cost. Women are extremely good at this as evident from the lasting bonds they enjoy. But the depth of the relationships also means that if a fight does erupt, they're unable to say “nothing personal.” Everything is intensely personal. This makes stepping back from discord, once it has burst through the surface, harder than for men. (Chap. 4, “Violence”)
Humanity's special place in the cosmos is one of abandoned claims and moving goal posts. (Chap. 5, “Kindness”)
In 1879, American economist Francis Walker tried to explain why members of his profession were in such “bad odor amongst real people.” He blamed it on their inability to understand why human behavior fails to comply w... (show all)ith economic theory. We do not always act the way economists think we should, mainly because we're both less selfish and less rational than economists think we are. Economists are being indoctrinated into a cardboard version of human nature, which they hold true to such a degree that their own behavior has begun to resemble it. Psychological tests have shown that economics majors are more egoistic than the average college student. (Chap. 6, “The Bipolar Ape”) - Last words
- (Click to show. Warning: May contain spoilers.)Since this animal has gained dominance over all others, it's all the more important that it takes an honest look in the mirror, so that it knows both the archenemy it faces and the ally that stands ready to help it build a better world.
- Original language*
- Engels
*Some information comes from Common Knowledge in other languages. Click "Edit" for more information.
Classifications
Statistics
- Members
- 778
- Popularity
- 31,201
- Reviews
- 14
- Rating
- (4.12)
- Languages
- 12 — Dutch, English, French, German, Greek, Italian, Latin, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, Swedish, Turkish
- Media
- Paper, Audiobook, Ebook
- ISBNs
- 31
- ASINs
- 6