John Carey (1) (1934–)

It seems an odd idea to get an English professor to edit an anthology of science writing, but it actually works rather well. Carey obviously has an eye for pieces that are sufficiently self-explanatory to be accessible to non-professional readers, but he also succeeds rather well at finding texts that show us scientists actually doing science, reasoning from observations and testing hypotheses experimentally.

Of course we get all the “big moments” — Galileo, Newton, Mendeleev, Darwin, Mme Curie, Einstein and so on — and we get pieces by most of the well-known “popularisers” (Gould, Dawkins, Feynman, etc.) but he also picks out some less obvious moments of discovery, and salts the mixture of science writing by scientists with a few teasing bits of science from poets and novelists. We probably know about Steinbeck’s marine biology and Nabokov’s butterflies, but what about George Orwell on toads, or Ted Hughes on cosmology?

Fittingly, the book finishes with Asimov’s chilling piece about the limits of world population, written half a century ago and truer (and scarier) than ever.

It’s a great book for anyone to dip into and will probably send you off down a few rabbit holes that are new to you, whatever your background, but I should think it would also be a very good choice if you need something to give to a non-scientific friend to help them understand what science is really about (besides wearing white coats and destroying the world, of course…).… (more)

Mixed feelings, in a positive vein. Carey takes us through a series of brief chapters, starting with the antique poets such as Homer and the Beowulf poet and then gearing up through the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries especially.

First of all, I think Carey makes it clear quite early on that this is a personal history, and a focus on a particular throughline of poetry, namely the Anglo-American sphere as inspired by the older Europeans. This is quite clear and indeed obvious; if you're going to broaden out to world poetry, you're going to have a very different book that becomes partly ethnographic since it can't possibly chart the growth of every movement. I say this because quite a few reviews here seem to be complaining about that fact and, frankly, I think they're being performative. As an Australian, I could equally bemoan that our rich poetic history isn't given its due here, but that's not the point of the book, and there are plenty of others on this subject. So perhaps a bit less with the deliberate complaining in lieu of actual commentary.

The core challenge with a book like this, though, is that it's inevitably a taste-tester. These chapters are so very brief that they cannot do justice to any of the poets contained herein. For the earlier chapters and those focusing on longer works, Carey gives us very little (even sometimes nothing) in the way of excerpts, meaning we're just being given his brief overview and an exhortation to read the works. Which is clearly his aim, so it's not a failure, but I think the volume would have benefited from attaching a single full poem to as many of the chapters as possible. The brevity of the chapters means that it isn't for complete novices to the written arts, but equally there's not much in the way of revelatory commentary for those of us who enjoy many of these works. And perhaps that's fine. Perhaps this book will reach its core audience - those who have dabbled in, or are genuinely open to, the reading of poetry - and provide them with dozens of points on which they can jump and begin new journeys. (The later chapters I found most pleasing, as the splintering of the poetic voice in the years around WWII makes for more challenging reading that rewards us hearing as many viewpoints on them as possible.)

A lovely volume in its way, but not one of the better broader overviews of poetry out there.… (more)