Graeme Newell's Reviews > The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity

The Dawn of Everything by David Graeber
Rate this book
Clear rating

by
12162514
's review

liked it
bookshelves: audible

Five stars for information…two stars for readability.

This book lays out some fascinating new findings on the origins of humanity and civilization. I was taught in school that hunter-gatherers led short brutal lives; then, humanity’s ascent to agriculture, cities, and governments was a deliverance from darkness and ignorance. Well, this book pretty much turns this whole model on its head.

Because Europeans wrote down their history in books and ancient civilizations didn’t, the 18th & 19th century scholars conveniently conjectured a self-aggrandizing story of our ancestors. The “noble savage” myth was born - grunting cave people more akin to apes than men.

Turns out that most of this trope got started back in the heyday of colonialism when Europeans needed moral justification for the genocide they were perpetrating across the globe. Gaeber & Wengrow present a trove of convincing evidence that the pinnacle of civilization was actually achieved in ancient times.

New archeological evidence shows that life in ancient times was pretty darn nice: large cities, sustainable land management, effective community policing, and a good life. The authors lay out a solid case that some of humanities greatest suffering has just come about recently with the advent of large centralized governments.

For most of human history we haven’t had priests, bureaucracies, and kings. Instead, we’ve had local municipalities, much like old-style New England town meetings. These governing councils did a bang-up job of building a good quality of life for most everyone. And many of these cities were BIG…many with thousands and thousands of people. They got big municipal projects accomplished, prevented abuses of power, and assured that no one person subjugated the populace.

It’s only been in modern times that this has fallen apart. Today, the top 1% have 43% of the resources. New archeological evidence shows this rarely happened in ancient times. The authors make the case that today we’re living at the nadir of civilization.

The evidence presented in this book is quite convincing and quite exhaustive, and I mean that literally. This is an exhausting book - 700 pages of minutia. I get the feeling the authors were primarily interested in building a solid case for their premise. Unfortunately, they neglected basic storytelling. I continually found myself nodding off in the middle of a paragraph on some esoteric piece of evidence. There are so many examples and so many civilizations profiled that it’s just darn hard to follow.

This could have been an outstanding book…if only it had been graced with a capable editor.

The information is groundbreaking, but it’s a long slog.
57 likes · flag

Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read The Dawn of Everything.
Sign In »

Reading Progress

November 4, 2021 – Shelved
November 4, 2021 – Shelved as: to-read
December 14, 2021 – Started Reading
December 14, 2021 – Shelved as: audible
December 14, 2021 –
9.0%
December 15, 2021 –
15.0%
December 15, 2021 –
20.0%
December 16, 2021 –
26.0%
December 17, 2021 –
34.0%
December 19, 2021 –
49.0%
December 21, 2021 –
71.0%
December 23, 2021 –
90.0%
December 24, 2021 – Finished Reading

Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)

dateDown arrow    newest »

message 1: by Caroline (last edited Dec 24, 2021 08:37PM) (new)

Caroline 700 pages of minutia and it was hard to follow! Bravo to you for getting to the end. Interesting that it was nevertheless a NYT bestseller - perhaps though not a best read or frequently finished.....

The nadir of civilization sounds about right though... :O(


Graeme Newell Definitely some amazing information in there and I’m glad I read it, but goodness it was a hard read. :-)


Glenn “Five stars for content, two stars for readability” explains exactly how I felt. Good to know I wasn’t alone!


Graeme Newell It was some damn impressive thinking, but there’s just far too many scientists who are big brains and not big writers.


back to top