Hannah Greendale (Hello, Bookworm)'s Reviews > The Overstory
The Overstory
by
by
Hannah Greendale (Hello, Bookworm)'s review
bookshelves: historical-fiction, booker-prize-nominee, adult, contemporary, fiction, pulitzer-winner
Jul 28, 2018
bookshelves: historical-fiction, booker-prize-nominee, adult, contemporary, fiction, pulitzer-winner
I'm on BookTube again! Come find me at Hello, Bookworm📚🐛
Richard Powers’ structural approach to The Overstory breaks with traditional plotting. The result is two books in one, each designed to appeal to a different type of reader. The flaw in this approach is that the book either reads like a literary triumph that starts slow then builds to something satiating, or it reads like a bait-and-switch with a breathtaking start followed by a wearisome and long-winded trek to the conclusion.
Part 1 (called “Roots”) reads like a magnificent short story collection. The backstory and exposition that would normally be woven throughout a book is delivered in several rousing anecdotes. Nine protagonists are introduced, their stories ranging from sweeping multi-generational sagas to brief glimpses into their private lives. These characters remain separate in “Roots,” yet their stories are united by meaningful interaction with trees. Each of their stories arrives at an arresting climax before Powers hits the pause button.
“Roots” will likely appeal to fans of 4 3 2 1 by Paul Auster or The Sport of Kings by C. E. Morgan. The remaining three-fourths of the book, however, are something else entirely.
Parts 2 through 4 (called “Trunk,” “Crown,” and “Seed,” respectively) sees these nine characters being inextricably drawn together. Their lives entangle, their shared interests and unique experiences with trees drive their actions. This portion of the book is arguably slower, with fewer revelations about the characters and more attention dedicated to exploring themes. Powers pulls back the curtain to introduce trees as a tenth character and forces us to examine our role in, and relationship to, nature.
All ten characters share similar beliefs, fight for the same causes, face the same external conflict (while wrestling with minimal or no internal conflict), and everyone gets along. It’s a startling contrast to the first part of the book; a harrowing and captivating intro that promises heartbreak and drama, followed by a stagnant alternative book in which the captivating backstories have very little bearing on the overall narrative.
At times, Powers’ writing is as beautiful and wondrous as nature, and his messages about activism and resistance are poignant but, ultimately, his execution is uneven and the final product is a book bloated with redundant characters.
Richard Powers’ structural approach to The Overstory breaks with traditional plotting. The result is two books in one, each designed to appeal to a different type of reader. The flaw in this approach is that the book either reads like a literary triumph that starts slow then builds to something satiating, or it reads like a bait-and-switch with a breathtaking start followed by a wearisome and long-winded trek to the conclusion.
Part 1 (called “Roots”) reads like a magnificent short story collection. The backstory and exposition that would normally be woven throughout a book is delivered in several rousing anecdotes. Nine protagonists are introduced, their stories ranging from sweeping multi-generational sagas to brief glimpses into their private lives. These characters remain separate in “Roots,” yet their stories are united by meaningful interaction with trees. Each of their stories arrives at an arresting climax before Powers hits the pause button.
“Roots” will likely appeal to fans of 4 3 2 1 by Paul Auster or The Sport of Kings by C. E. Morgan. The remaining three-fourths of the book, however, are something else entirely.
Parts 2 through 4 (called “Trunk,” “Crown,” and “Seed,” respectively) sees these nine characters being inextricably drawn together. Their lives entangle, their shared interests and unique experiences with trees drive their actions. This portion of the book is arguably slower, with fewer revelations about the characters and more attention dedicated to exploring themes. Powers pulls back the curtain to introduce trees as a tenth character and forces us to examine our role in, and relationship to, nature.
All ten characters share similar beliefs, fight for the same causes, face the same external conflict (while wrestling with minimal or no internal conflict), and everyone gets along. It’s a startling contrast to the first part of the book; a harrowing and captivating intro that promises heartbreak and drama, followed by a stagnant alternative book in which the captivating backstories have very little bearing on the overall narrative.
At times, Powers’ writing is as beautiful and wondrous as nature, and his messages about activism and resistance are poignant but, ultimately, his execution is uneven and the final product is a book bloated with redundant characters.
The bends in the alders speak of long-ago disasters. Spikes of pale chinquapin flowers shake down their pollen; soon they will turn into spiny fruits. Poplars repeat the wind's gossip. Persimmons and walnuts set out their bribes and rowans their blood-red clusters. Ancient oaks wave prophecies of future weather. The several hundred kinds of hawthorn laugh at the single name their forced to share.
1496 likes · Like
∙
flag
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
The Overstory.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
July 23, 2018
–
Started Reading
July 23, 2018
– Shelved
July 23, 2018
– Shelved as:
historical-fiction
July 23, 2018
– Shelved as:
booker-prize-nominee
July 23, 2018
–
1.2%
"Then comes the prairie winter. The cold tests their will to live. Nights in the gap-riddled cabin zero their blood. They must crack the ice in the water basin every morning just to splash their faces. But they are young, free, and driven - the sole backers of their own existence. Winter doesn't kill them. Not yet. The blackest despair at the heart of them gets pressed to diamond."
page
6
July 25, 2018
–
56.57%
"If you want to maximize net present value of a forest for its current owners and deliver the most wood in the shortest time, then yes: cut the old growth [...]. But if you want next century's soil, if you want pure water, if you want variety and health, if you want stabilizers and services we can't even measure, then be patient and let the forest give slowly.""
page
284
July 27, 2018
–
Finished Reading
December 31, 2020
– Shelved as:
adult
December 31, 2020
– Shelved as:
contemporary
December 31, 2020
– Shelved as:
fiction
February 26, 2024
– Shelved as:
pulitzer-winner
Comments Showing 1-50 of 155 (155 new)
message 1:
by
Natasha
(new)
Jul 28, 2018 09:11PM
Mmm, I’m going to wait for your review before buying this one now. 3 stars may mean library for me.
reply
|
flag
@Mindy: Thanks! I'm off to a rocky start with my selections, but I'm still looking forward to exploring the other titles I've cherry picked from the longlist.
@David: It's time! The biggie was the only one already in my possession when the longlist was announced; hence, I dove right in. :)
@Natasha: I definitely suggest checking out from the library. If, upon completion, you love it (as many others have), then you can support the author by purchasing a copy. If you find the book uneven and somewhat disappointing (as I did), then you won't have wasted any money.
It’s also the first of the longlist for me, but Im LOOOVING it. It was hard for me to get through the first 150 pages but now I’m so in the story. I don’t want it to end!
@Goska A: I've been noticing this among readers responding to this book. People either love the first part and lose interest in the second part, or vice versa. I'm among those who absolutely loved the first part (Roots) but completely lost interest in the rest of the book. I'm really glad you're enjoying it.
Ahh, poo. I was REALLY looking forward to this one. But, maybe I should just read the first part, since you compared it to Sport of Kings...Or, maybe, because I love trees, I'll like the whole thing despite its redundancy in characters and its odd structure. Fabulous review, Hannah.
Great review. Richard Powers is one of my favorite authors, so my expectations were high going into this one (Orfeo, for example, was quite the tour de force). Your review really captures how I felt reading this (unfortunately).
@Melissa: I was giddy with excitement when I started reading this book. I almost wrote to you to tell you to start reading it ASAP, but I’m glad I held off. I’d have done you a grave disservice.
Hannah wrote: "@Melissa: I was giddy with excitement when I started reading this book. I almost wrote to you to tell you to start reading it ASAP, but I’m glad I held off. I’d have done you a grave disservice." Well, I'm even MORE curious now, and might have to give it a whirl anyway. "Giddy with excitement" -- oh how I need that in a read RIGHT NOW.
Fantastic review Hannah, I am reading this next month (September) I think this is the longest one from the longlist. For August I read three already, From a Low and Quiet Sea, The Mars Room and Snap. I have two more to read in August which are Milkman and Warlight. So far all that I read from the longlist are underwhelming which really makes me question their selections. I just don't know what to say!
My book club is discussing this Tuesday. I am stopped at 50% and just don’t think I’m going to get through it. I’ll be interested in hearing the discussion.
@Constantine: I'm so sorry to hear your foray into this year's longlist has proved underwhelming. At this point, given my experience with the first two books and the feedback I've been getting from other readers/reviewers, I'm worried my enjoyment of the longlist will continue to wane. Seems like (at least) one of the judges has a thing for books where nothing much happens.
@Judi Ross: I commend you for DNFing. In my opinion, you've already read the best part of the book. No sense in wasting your time with the second half.
Hannah wrote: "@Melissa: Sounds like it's time for you to read West by Carys Davies."Ahh. I SO want to read that one!!! Thanks for the rec. Might need to get it sooner than later, then.
Hannah wrote: "@Constantine: I'm so sorry to hear your foray into this year's longlist has proved underwhelming. At this point, given my experience with the first two books and the feedback I've been getting from..."
I feel the same Hannah as you do. My excitement has definitly waned compared to when I started. I have the urge to dump the books from my September list. I will still read Milkman and Warlight to see how I feel after reading 5 books.
I feel the same Hannah as you do. My excitement has definitly waned compared to when I started. I have the urge to dump the books from my September list. I will still read Milkman and Warlight to see how I feel after reading 5 books.
I have been very interested in reading this book. Your review shows this book to be a very unique one. May wait on this one until October when I have more time. Thanks for this great review!
Ha ha! I’m another one who agrees three stars means the library! I’m tending to think I don’t get on with these disjointed-type books, I dislike having to reinvest the energy to get back inside the book.
Nice review! I haven't finished the book yet (I'm a little past halfway through, right after Patricia's storyline), but I'm getting the sense that the metaphorical structure of the book is actually meant to unfold like rings in a tree, with outer layers of stories surrounding a dense inner layer (Patricia's story). I'll probably write up my own review once I've finished the book, but I enjoyed reading your take on the narrative structure
@Philip Cherny: Powers is definitely going for that tree-ringed structure. He says as much in the narrative.
I SO agree with you on this one Hannah. I thought the first part was gripping, but the rest of the novel failed to thrill me. Though I do admire it on many levels.
Your review "hits the nail on the head" perfectly, Hannah. I'm glad I borrowed the book from the library instead of buying it.
Totally agree with this review. I still haven't quite finished this book. 100 pages left, but I found the first part of this 'Roots' very beautiful, completely absorbing, couldn't put it down. The rest of it has been a bit if a slog. I am so close to the end now but I am struggling to care about how it ends.
All the safe, comfortable nit-wits who praise or otherwise ‘agree’ with your lazy review are all as much “part of the problem” described IN the novel as you are.
Sean, it’s possible that your inability to contribute to a conversation without immediately resorting to abuse and personal insults is also ‘part of the problem’. That too is described IN the novel.
I agree with you review but for one thing - I think I am the other type of reader because for me Roots was a nice diversion but not gripping. I get the book really came into its own from Trunk onwards and by Canopy was a real page turner. You have explained the book beautifully though , better than I could have done.
I feel so validated. I've been wanting to give up for the last 100 pages but I feel so loyal after that fantastic Part 1. Great review. Thank you.
I thoroughly and respectfully disagree with your review here. It seems like you may have been expecting something in particular while reading this novel—even if you were unaware of it—instead of dropping your expectations and allowing yourself to listen to the trees rustle in the wind.
The last 100 pages are brilliant if you do not have a preconceived notion on what you think this book is really about. Brilliant. Best book I’ve read in a long time. Pulitzer readers got it.
I agree with your review. On page 325 and I want it to be over. I have to return it to the library in two days.
Hannah - I finally read this and had a much different experience than you. I loved every word, the message, the characters, the cause.
Good review. I haven’t read the book but now I have a good idea of what I’d be jumping into if I pick it up. Worth it for the first half? Not worth due to the second half? 🤷🏼♀️